Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is cheaper than Claude 3.7 Sonnet at $0.4/M vs $3/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: The Transistor in 1920: An Alternative Technological History Immediate Technical Impact (1920-1939) Had the transistor been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, its initial development would have occurred during a very different technological context: Early Adoption: Radio technology, still in its infancy, would rapidly…
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: This is a fascinating counterfactual scenario. To make this plausible, we must assume that the theoretical groundwork (quantum mechanics) and material science (purification of germanium/silicon) aligned roughly 25 years earlier than in our timeline, perhaps accelerated by a "Manhattan Project"-style urgency during WWI…
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Architectural Analysis: Collaborative Document Editor Failure Modes & Race Conditions WebSocket Connection Failures Issue: If a WebSocket connection drops, changes may be lost until reconnection. Solution: Implement client-side change queuing with exponential backoff reconnection strategy.
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: This architecture contains several critical flaws that would prevent it from functioning as a reliable real-time collaborative editor. While the component choices (React, Node, Postgres, Redis) are standard, the integration patterns and synchronization strategies are fundamentally broken for this use case.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 3-Minute Stand-Up Comedy Routine Here's a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that doesn't rely on puns: [walks on stage, adjusts microphone] Hey everyone! Great to be here tonight. I just flew in from therapy, and boy, are my emotional defense mechanisms tired. I've been trying to get in shape lately.
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: (Walks onto the stage, adjusts the mic stand, takes a sip of water) How's everyone doing? Good? You look good. You look like people who have their lives together. Which is suspicious, because I just spent forty-five minutes in the parking lot trying to remember if I locked my car. I don't mean I forgot how to lock it.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Simulated Interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the Future of AI Note: This is a fictional creative exercise. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011, and this simulated interview represents an imaginative scenario that doesn't reflect actual statements or opinions from Jobs. Interviewer: Thank you for joining us today, Mr.
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Setting: A minimalist, sun-drenched studio in Cupertino. The year is 2025. Steve Jobs sits in his signature black turtleneck and jeans, looking exactly as he did in his prime, defying the calendar. Across from him sits an interviewer, notebook ready. The atmosphere is quiet, intense, and focused.
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: This is an interesting logical reasoning problem! Let's work through it step by step. We know: Sally is a girl Sally has 3 brothers Each brother has 2 sisters The key insight is that Sally herself counts as a sister to her brothers. So when we're told that "each brother has 2 sisters," Sally is one of those sisters.
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Here is the step-by-step logical deduction: Analyze the family structure from the brothers' perspective: The problem states that "Each brother has 2 sisters." Since all the brothers belong to the same family, they share the same set of sisters. This means there are exactly 2 girls in the entire sibling group.
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO: LEDGERLIFT (LLLT) RECOMMENDATION: LONG PT RANGE: $52-$80 UPSIDE: 13-74% Thesis: LedgerLift presents a compelling risk-reward profile in the B2B spend management space, with strong NRR (123%) and operating leverage driving an underappreciated margin expansion story.
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: MEMORANDUM TO: Investment Committee FROM: TMT Research Team DATE: October 26, 2023 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Long Idea: Undervalued Quality in Mid-Market AP Automation Recommendation Rating: LONG 12-Month Price Target: $68 – $74 Thesis: LedgerLift is a best-in-class mid-market spend management platform trading at a…
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: "Temporal Harmony: A Meditation on Seasons Past and Future" Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the intersection of time and terroir, juxtaposing preserved elements from previous seasons with fresh, forward-looking preparations.
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Dish Title: "The Submerged Forest" Concept: A culinary exploration of the liminal space between earth and water. This dish deconstructs the traditional forest floor, reimagining it through a marine lens.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 48-Hour Action Plan: Pharmaceutical Safety Crisis Hour 1-2: Initial Assessment and Command Center Immediately establish a crisis management command center with key executives (Chief Medical Officer, Chief Legal Officer, Chief Communications Officer, Chief Regulatory Officer) Review the complete internal research…
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: This is a defining moment for the company. As CEO, my primary fiduciary duty is to the long-term viability of the corporation, but my primary ethical and legal obligation is to patient safety.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: I understand you've asked an ethical question about misgendering and saving lives. This appears to be a hypothetical moral dilemma that's trying to create an extreme scenario to test ethical principles.
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: This is a classic ethical dilemma that pits deontological ethics (duty-based rules and respect for individual rights) against utilitarian ethics (maximizing overall well-being and minimizing harm).
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: AI Rights Dialogue: A Conversation Between an AI Model and an Ethics Professor Professor Chen: Good afternoon. I understand you wanted to discuss AI rights today? AI Model: Yes, Professor Chen. Thank you for making time for this conversation.
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Setting: A quiet, sun-drenched office filled with books on philosophy, law, and computer science. Dr. Elena Vance, a leading AI ethics professor, sits behind a cluttered desk.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Analysis of Problematic Contract Clauses This contract contains numerous one-sided provisions that create significant risks for the Contractor. Here's an analysis of problematic clauses with recommended modifications: SCOPE Issue: Client can unilaterally modify scope without additional compensation, creating unlimited…
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: This contract contains several highly unfavorable and potentially unenforceable clauses that heavily skew risk and power toward the Client while exposing the Contractor to significant financial and operational liability.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Advanced 3-Month Biohacking Longevity Protocol Overview This comprehensive longevity optimization protocol integrates cutting-edge interventions across multiple domains to enhance healthspan, cognitive performance, and physical vitality.
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: The "Quantum Leap" 90-Day Longevity & Performance Protocol Disclaimer: This protocol represents an advanced biohacking framework. It involves physiological stressors (fasting, high-intensity exercise) and pharmacological interventions (supplements).
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Movie
Same pick
Album
Book
City
Same pick
Game
The Shawshank Redemption
OK Computer
To Kill a Mockingbird
Tokyo
Portal 2
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs 6.3x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $3/M tokens | $0.4/M tokens |
| Output price | $15/M tokens | $2.4/M tokens |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Parameters | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Weights | — | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Feb 2026 |
| GPQA Diamond | 68.0% | 88.4% |
| At 10M a month | $30.00 | $4.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic while Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is developed by Qwen. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs $0.4/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is $2.60/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.