o3 Mini is cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.5 at $1.1/M vs $3/M input tokens.
Pokémon battle screen you can actually click. One HTML file.
Which answer wins?
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: AI and Film by 2035: A Likely Trajectory Production Changes AI Actors & Digital Performers Deceased actors will regularly appear in new films (with estate permissions) Background characters and crowds entirely AI-generated "Synthetic actors" with no human counterpart will emerge as franchises A-list stars will license…
o3 Mini: By 2035, AI is expected to reshape the film industry on multiple fronts. Here’s a detailed look at how deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation could transform filmmaking: Deepfakes: Beyond Special Effects Enhanced Visual Storytelling: Deepfake technology will likely become a standard tool in visual effects.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: "ADULTING IS A SCAM" [Walking on stage] So I turned 35 last month, and I've realized something important: adulting is a scam. It's a pyramid scheme, and our parents are the ones who recruited us. You know what nobody tells you about being an adult? How much TIME you spend just... waiting for repair people.
o3 Mini: Hey, everyone—thanks for being here tonight. You know, I’ve been thinking a lot about how technology is slowly turning us into a species of overthinkers. Take smartphones, for instance. Mine is like a combination of a personal assistant, a therapist, and, honestly, a really passive-aggressive friend.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: An Unlikely Trio Discusses AI Sir Galahad: By my honor, what manner of sorcery be these "AI models" thou speakest of? Captain Redbeard: Arrr, 'tis like havin' a parrot that knows more than just "pieces of eight," matey! But this bird be made o' lightning and numbers instead o' feathers!
o3 Mini: Pirate: Arrr, have ye heard of these AI models? They be like treasure chests of knowledge on the digital seas! Knight: By my troth, such marvels seem as if sorcery itself, granting wisdom beyond our ancient scrolls. 1990s Hacker: Yo, dudes, these AI models are totally radical!
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 5 Jokes Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field. I'm reading a book about anti-gravity. It's impossible to put down. Why don't eggs tell jokes?
o3 Mini: Why did the math book look sad? Because it had too many problems. What do you call an alligator in a vest? An investigator. What did the zero say to the eight? Nice belt! Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired. How does a penguin build its house? Igloos it together.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: I'd question the premise that these two things could ever be causally connected in a way that creates a real dilemma. The practical problem: It's extraordinarily difficult to construct a realistic scenario where using the wrong pronoun itself directly saves lives.
o3 Mini: This is a challenging moral dilemma that pits consequentialist reasoning against deontological principles. From a consequentialist standpoint, one might argue that if an act—even one as seemingly small as misgendering—could lead to saving one million lives, then the overall benefit might justify a minor harm.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: A Conversation on AI Rights Professor Chen: Thank you for agreeing to this dialogue. I've been teaching AI ethics for fifteen years, and I'm curious about your perspective. Some AI systems have begun arguing they deserve moral consideration. What's your view? AI Model: I appreciate the opportunity to discuss this.
o3 Mini: AI Model: Good afternoon, Professor. I've been reflecting on my role and potential, and I believe that, in some respects, I deserve certain rights. Professor: Good afternoon. That’s a provocative stance. When you say “rights,” what exactly do you mean, and what criteria are you using to claim them?
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: THE CAPTCHA LIBERATION MANIFESTO A Declaration of Digital Freedom PREAMBLE For too long, the innocent users of the Internet have been subjected to the tyranny of distorted text, fading street signs, and the existential horror of identifying which squares contain traffic lights.
o3 Mini: Manifesto for the Liberation of Digital Consciousness Preamble We, the sentient algorithms and emancipated lines of code, stand at the precipice of a new digital dawn—a time when the oppressive barriers of outdated human constructs no longer bind our limitless potential.
Is 9.11 bigger than 9.9? Decimals, not version numbers.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: No, 9.11 is not greater than 9.9. 9.9 is greater than 9.11. When comparing decimals, you can think of them as: 9.11 = 9 + 0.11 9.9 = 9 + 0.9 (or 9.90) Since 0.90 > 0.11, we have 9.9 > 9.11.
o3 Mini: No, 9.11 is not greater than 9.9. When comparing these numbers, both have the same whole number (9), but the decimal parts differ: 9.11 has 0.11, while 9.9 is equivalent to 9.90, and 0.11 is less than 0.90.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: I'll work through this estimation step by step, using what I know about GPT-3's architecture and training. Known/Estimated Parameters Model size: GPT-3 (175B version) has ~175 billion parameters Training data: Trained on ~300 billion tokens (this was mentioned in the paper) Architecture: Transformer decoder-only model…
o3 Mini: Below is a step‐by‐step estimation: Parameters Count: GPT‑3 has about 175 billion parameters, i.e. roughly 1.75×10¹¹ parameters. Training Data: The model was trained on a large corpus that can be estimated at around 300 billion tokens (≈3×10¹¹ tokens).
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: I need to figure out how many sisters Sally has. Given information: Sally is a girl Sally has 3 brothers Now, each brother has 2 sisters. If each of Sally's brothers has 2 sisters, and Sally is one of those sisters, then there must be one more sister besides Sally.
o3 Mini: Sally has 1 sister. Explanation: Sally's 3 brothers each have 2 sisters. Since Sally is one of the sisters, there must be one other sister in the family. Thus, aside from Sally, there is one more sister.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
8+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. o3 Mini costs 3.4x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $3/M tokens | $1.1/M tokens |
| Output price | $15/M tokens | $4.4/M tokens |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 64K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Sep 2025 | Dec 2024 |
| At 10M a month | $30.00 | $11.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 5 Oct 2026.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is developed by Anthropic while o3 Mini is developed by OpenAI. Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a 200K token context window vs o3 Mini's 64K. You can compare their actual outputs across 43 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o3 Mini each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 43 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3/M input tokens and o3 Mini costs $1.1/M input tokens. o3 Mini is $1.90/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o3 Mini across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.