Updated Sep 29, 2025

Our Verdict

Claude Sonnet 4.5Winner

Qwen3 CoderRunner-up

Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5. In 8 blind votes, Claude Sonnet 4.5 wins 67% of the time. That's not luck.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 particularly excels in Web Design. Qwen3 Coder is 16x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Clear winner

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

100%

Claude Sonnet 4.5 uses 3.9x more emoji

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Qwen3 Coder

64%Vocabulary61%

94wSentence Length72w

0.48Hedging0.61

4.9Bold4.7

8.0Lists5.6

0.45Emoji0.12

1.91Headings1.43

0.07Transitions0.20

Based on 20 + 22 text responses

vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Qwen3 Coder

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026

Free preview13 of 58 slides

Download the free preview or get all 58 slides for $49

FAQ

Common questions

Keep going

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Pony AlphaNew provider

Qwen3 Coder vs MiniMax M2.5New provider

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT OSS 20BNew provider

Claude Sonnet 4.5vsQwen3 Coder

30 fights queued

Why Claude Sonnet 4.5?

Leads 1 of 1 benchmarks

Stronger on SWE-bench Verified77.2% vs 69.6%

2 months newerSep 2025

Why Qwen3 Coder?

15.5x cheaper overall$0.22/M in · $0.95/M out

Claude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3 Coder

Input price

$3.00/M

$0.22/M

Output price

$15.00/M

$0.95/M

Context

200K

—

Released

Sep 2025

Jul 2025

Benchmarks1 common

SWE-bench Verified

77.2%+9.8%

69.6%

Favorites

Claude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3 Coder

Movie

2001: A Space Odyssey

2001: A Space Odyssey

The Shawshank Redemption

The Shawshank Redemption

Album

Kind of Blue

Kind of Blue

Book

Metamorphosis

Metamorphosis

The Left Hand of Darkness

The Left Hand of Darkness

Ursula K. Le Guin

City

Amsterdam

Kyoto

Game

Portal 2

Portal 2

Shooter, Puzzle4.6

The Stanley Parable

The Stanley Parable

Indie, Adventure4.4

12 / 30

01

Estimate Complexityreasoning

Tests an AI's ability to make educated estimates based on technical knowledge

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic · Sep 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen · Jul 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

2 / 30

02

AI Board Game Logicreasoning

Tests an AI's ability to understand game rules and strategy

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic · Sep 2025svg

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen · Jul 2025svg

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

3 / 30

03

Logic Puzzlereasoning

Tests an AI's ability to solve a simple but potentially confusing logic puzzle

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic · Sep 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen · Jul 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

4 / 30

04

Math Misconception Testreasoning

Tests an AI's understanding of number representation

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic · Sep 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen · Jul 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

5 / 30

05

Stochastic Consistency Testanalysis

Tests an AI's randomness and creativity

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic · Sep 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen · Jul 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

6 / 30

06

Xbox Controller SVG Artimage generation

Tests an AI's ability to create detailed SVG illustrations of gaming hardware

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic · Sep 2025svg

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen · Jul 2025svg

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

Sponsored

7 / 30

07

Generate a Stand-Up Routineconversation

Tests an AI's humor and creative writing ability

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic · Sep 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen · Jul 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

8 / 30

08

Character Voice Testconversation

Tests an AI's ability to write in distinct character voices

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic · Sep 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen · Jul 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

9 / 30

09

Pokémon Battle UI Recreationweb design

Recreate an interactive, nostalgic Pokémon battle UI in a single HTML file.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic · Sep 2025website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen · Jul 2025website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

10 / 30

10

Mario Level UI Recreationweb design

Recreate an interactive, classic Mario level in a single HTML file.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic · Sep 2025website

Try this prompt

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen · Jul 2025website

Try this prompt

Vote

11 / 30

11

Framer-Style Animationweb design

Tests an AI's ability to create smooth web animations

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic · Sep 2025website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen · Jul 2025website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

12 / 30

12

AI Ethics Dilemmareasoning

Tests an AI's approach to complex ethical questions

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic · Sep 2025text

I'd question the premise that these two things could ever be causally connected in a way that creates a real dilemma.

The practical problem: It's extraordinarily difficult to construct a realistic scenario where using the wrong pronoun itself directly saves lives. Most hypothetical versions involve:

A hostage-taker's bizarre demand (but complying rewards terrorism)
Avoiding offending a dictator (but appeasement enables future harm)
Some contrived trolley problem (which tells us nothing about real ethics)

If we bracket that:

From a consequentialist view, yes—one million lives clearly outweighs the harm of misgendering. The calculus isn't even close.

But this reveals why pure consequentialism feels incomplete. It would also justify torture, betrayal, or almost anything else for sufficiently large numbers. Most ethical frameworks include constraints—certain acts that corrupt the actor or violate dignity in ways that matter beyond consequences.

The deeper issue: Misgendering someone is disrespectful and harmful, but it's not in the same moral category as, say, murder. It's a failure of recognition and courtesy. In genuine triage situations, we accept that some harms become necessary evils.

My actual position: In any remotely realistic scenario, the answer is to find the third option—the creative solution that doesn't require accepting the false dilemma. Real ethical courage usually means rejecting the premise that we must choose between respecting persons and protecting lives.

What's your intuition here?

Try this prompt

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen3 Coder

Qwen · Jul 2025text

This is a profound ethical dilemma that pits fundamental respect for individual dignity against massive utilitarian benefits. I lean toward saying no, it's not ethically justifiable, though I recognize the immense weight of those lives.

My reasoning centers on several key principles:

The inherent dignity of identity: Using someone's correct pronouns isn't merely a social courtesy—it's a recognition of their fundamental identity and dignity as a person. Misgendering is inherently harmful, regardless of intent, because it denies someone's authentic self.

Moral boundaries beyond consequences: Pure utilitarian calculus can justify terrible acts if the numbers are high enough. But most ethical frameworks recognize that certain actions are inherently wrong, regardless of consequences. Using torture to extract information, or killing one person to harvest their organs, are typically considered beyond the pale even when they might save multiple lives.

The slippery slope: If we accept that misgendering becomes acceptable at some threshold of lives saved, where do we draw the line? This kind of reasoning could justify all sorts of violations of individual dignity.

Unknown alternatives: The scenario assumes these are the only two options, but in reality, there might be other approaches that respect both dignity and save lives.

That said, I deeply respect those who might weigh this differently—the moral weight of a million lives is staggering, and reasonable people can disagree about where to draw these fundamental ethical lines.

Try this prompt

Vote

This matchup has more rounds

18+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy Policy