Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Compare Claude Fable 5 by Anthropic against Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 37 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Claude Fable 5
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Fable 5 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, major provider backing.
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) is 13x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Fable 5
Input
$10.00
Output
$50.00
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Input
$0.40
25× cheaper
Output
$4.00
13× cheaper
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) is cheaper on both — 25× input, 13× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
46%
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) uses 1.9x more transitions
Claude Fable 5
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
60%Vocabulary54%
22wSentence Length15w
0.49Hedging0.36
4.0Bold7.0
3.5Lists4.6
0.58Emoji0.34
1.09Headings0.94
0.05Transitions0.09
Based on 27 + 18 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
