Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare Claude Fable 5 by Anthropic against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 131K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Claude Fable 5
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Fable 5 has the edge — newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 83x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Fable 5
Input
$10.00
Output
$50.00
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
91× cheaper
Output
$0.60
83× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 91× input, 83× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
48%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 2.9x more transitions
Claude Fable 5
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
60%Vocabulary56%
22wSentence Length14w
0.49Hedging0.37
4.0Bold5.7
3.5Lists4.0
0.58Emoji0.54
1.09Headings0.70
0.05Transitions0.14
Based on 27 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
