Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 by Anthropic against Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B by Google AI, context windows of 200K vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B?

Claude Haiku 4.5 and Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B are both competitive models. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $0.13/M for Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B. Context windows: 200K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Claude Haiku 4.5 is made by anthropic while Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is from google. Claude Haiku 4.5 has a 200K token context window compared to Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B's 262K. On pricing, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $0.13/M for Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B.

Our Verdict
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 13x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

Claude Haiku 4.5 uses 20.4x more emoji

Claude Haiku 4.5
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
61%Vocabulary58%
47wSentence Length18w
0.64Hedging0.31
5.1Bold6.8
6.3Lists3.3
0.20Emoji0.00
2.46Headings0.74
0.17Transitions0.15
Based on 24 + 27 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Haiku 4.5Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
FAQ