Claude Haiku 4.5
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B
Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 by Anthropic against Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI, context windows of 200K vs 262K, tested across 44 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Google: Gemma 4 31B?
Claude Haiku 4.5 and Google: Gemma 4 31B are both competitive models. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. Context windows: 200K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Google: Gemma 4 31B
Claude Haiku 4.5 is made by anthropic while Google: Gemma 4 31B is from google. Claude Haiku 4.5 has a 200K token context window compared to Google: Gemma 4 31B's 262K. On pricing, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B.
Our Verdict
Google: Gemma 4 31B
Claude Haiku 4.5Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Google: Gemma 4 31B has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.
Google: Gemma 4 31B is 13x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
100%
Claude Haiku 4.5 uses 2.6x more headings
Claude Haiku 4.5
Google: Gemma 4 31B
61%Vocabulary57%
47wSentence Length18w
0.64Hedging0.37
5.1Bold7.1
6.3Lists4.0
0.20Emoji0.24
2.46Headings0.94
0.17Transitions0.16
Based on 24 + 23 text responses
vs
Ask them anything yourself
FAQ