Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 by Anthropic against MiniMax M3 by MiniMax, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 52 shared challenges. Updated June 2026.
Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiniMax M3 are both competitive models. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M3. Context windows: 200K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude Haiku 4.5 is made by anthropic while MiniMax M3 is from minimax. Claude Haiku 4.5 has a 200K token context window compared to MiniMax M3's 1049K. On pricing, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M3.
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
MiniMax M3 is 4.2x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
MiniMax M3 is cheaper on both — 3.3× input, 4.2× output
Claude Haiku 4.5 uses 7.0x more transitions
Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 by Anthropic against MiniMax M3 by MiniMax, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 52 shared challenges. Updated June 2026.
Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiniMax M3 are both competitive models. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M3. Context windows: 200K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude Haiku 4.5 is made by anthropic while MiniMax M3 is from minimax. Claude Haiku 4.5 has a 200K token context window compared to MiniMax M3's 1049K. On pricing, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M3.
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
MiniMax M3 is 4.2x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
MiniMax M3 is cheaper on both — 3.3× input, 4.2× output
Claude Haiku 4.5 uses 7.0x more transitions