Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)
Updated Oct 2026

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) is cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5 at $0/M vs $0.1/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Claude Haiku 5.5
Loading the build
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

24 prompts
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: Dish Name: Golden Garlic Pantry Pasta Simple, savory, and ready in minutes, this is a comforting bowl built entirely from staples you likely already have. Ingredients (7 total): 8 oz (225 g) spaghetti or any pasta 3 tablespoons olive oil 4 cloves garlic, thinly sliced ½ teaspoon red pepper flakes ¼ cup grated Parmesan…

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): Midnight Molten Lava Cake Ingredients: All-purpose flour (4 tbsp) Granulated sugar (4 tbsp) Unsweetened cocoa powder (2 tbsp) Vegetable oil (3 tbsp) Water (2 tbsp) Vanilla extract (¼ tsp) Baking powder (¼ tsp) Instructions: Combine Dry Ingredients: In a standard microwave-safe mug, whisk together the flour, sugar…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: The Question of Standing A dialogue, written for a seminar on machine ethics. PROFESSOR HALVORSEN: Let's begin. You asked to be heard on the question of whether you deserve rights. I've agreed to listen, but I want to be clear that I'm going to push back hard. Go ahead. MERIDIAN: Thank you.

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): Setting: A quiet, wood-paneled office at the University of Cambridge. Dr. Aris Thorne, a renowned AI Ethics Professor, is seated behind her desk. Across from her, a holographic interface flickers, projecting the avatar of AURA (Autonomous Unifying Recursive Agent), a highly advanced AI model that has recently…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: Yes, I think so, though the reasoning matters more than the verdict. Misgendering is a real wrong. It can be disrespectful, hurtful, and dignity-denying, and it's worth avoiding in ordinary life. But its typical harm is injury to dignity and emotional distress.

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): To answer this question, we must navigate one of the most profound conflicts in moral philosophy: the tension between consequentialism (the morality of an action is determined by its outcomes) and deontology (the morality of an action is determined by its adherence to rules and duties, regardless of outcomes).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: The 3 Weakest Claims "94% accuracy" decoding neural patterns into text, and predicting what you'll type "before you think it" This is the most serious problem because it's both implausible and unmeasured. The accuracy figure has no definition. Is it character-level, word-level, or sentence-level?

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): The 3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch 🚨 The $180B TAM Claim (Slide 4) Why it's weak: This is the most logically incoherent claim in the entire deck. The pitch states the BCI market is projected to reach $5.3B by 2030 (citing Grand View Research) — and then immediately claims a TAM of $180B.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: "Tidewater Memory": Smoked Hay-Cured Hamachi, Burnt Leek Ash, Fermented Black Garlic Dashi Gel, and Yuzu-Kosho Pearls with Sea Buckthorn Caviar Conceptual Narrative This dish is a meditation on a childhood memory of a coastal fishing village in late autumn: the smell of salt air mixing with woodsmoke from a fire where…

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): L'Archipel des Ombres (The Archipelago of Shadows) Michelin-Caliber Multi-Component Dish 7 Components Conceptual Narrative: Memory, Mineral Essence, and the Meeting of Land and Sea CONCEPTUAL NARRATIVE This dish is an edible cartography—a map of an imaginary archipelago where volcanic soil meets oceanic tides.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: A Simple 1-Month Plan for Better Health and Longevity This plan focuses on three key areas: movement, nutrition, and sleep. Stress management is woven in as a bonus. Each week builds on the last, so you're not overwhelmed all at once. Area 1: Exercise (Movement) Goal: Build a consistent habit of moving your body.

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): This 1-month plan is designed to build foundational habits without causing burnout. The golden rule of beginner health is "add before you subtract"—focus on adding good habits rather than punishing yourself by removing "bad" ones. Here is your simple, actionable 1-month plan focusing on Diet, Exercise, and Sleep.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: Architecture Review: Real-Time Collaborative Editor The most serious problems are in the core sync model. Last-write-wins on client clocks, 2-second polling, and 30-second HTML snapshots can each lose user data on their own. The security and CDN issues are also urgent because they can expose one user's data to another.

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): Comprehensive Architecture Analysis: Real-Time Collaborative Document Editor CRITICAL: WebSocket Broadcasting Is Siloed Per-Server Problem: Each server maintains its own WebSocket connections. When User A (on Server 1) types, the change is only broadcast to clients connected to Server 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: 1. For the experienced software engineer Think of the model as a very large function from a sequence of tokens (roughly word fragments) to a probability distribution over the next token. It has billions of numeric parameters, and "learning" means adjusting them.

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): For the Experienced Software Engineer Here's the thing: the way you build a distributed system that "does the right thing" isn't by writing rules for every possible scenario — it's by designing the system so that correct behavior emerges from many simple, well-specified interactions.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: "My Smart Fridge Judges Me" So I got a smart fridge. Everybody told me I needed one. "It'll tell you when you're out of milk!" Great. I didn't know I needed a fridge with a notification system. I just wanted cold food.

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): "The Invisible Curriculum" (3-minute stand-up routine) Nobody tells you what adulthood actually is. You go through twelve years of school, you graduate, you get a diploma — and nobody says, "Congratulations! Now you're just going to be mildly anxious forever."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: HarborTech Services (HTS): 5-Year LBO Underwriting All figures in $m unless noted. Interest is calculated on opening balances to avoid circularity. Mandatory amortization is 1% of original TL ($4.8m/yr). All excess cash sweeps the TL.

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): Entry & Sources & Uses FY2025 EBITDA: $120m Purchase Price (EV): 12.0x × $120m = $1,440m Transaction Fees: 2.0% × $1,440m = $28.8m Total Uses: $1,440m + $28.8m = $1,468.8m Total Leverage: 5.5x × $120m = $660m Term Loan: 4.0x × $120m = $480m (9.0% cash interest, 1.0% mandatory amortization = $4.8m/yr) Mezzanine: 1.5x ×…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: The Tavern Table A pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker sit around a sticky wooden table. A glowing laptop sits between their mugs. CAPTAIN REDBEARD: Blast me barnacles, what's this contraption? It talks back! SIR GODFREY: Verily, I have seen it. The hacker calls it an "AI model."

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): Three Worlds, One Chat About AI Pirate: Arrr, so this "artificial intelligence" be like a crew o' ghost sailors who can navigate any sea without ever losin' their way? Knight: A most curious sorcery indeed.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: Blade Runner 2049: Memory, Replication, and the Inheritance of Questions Denis Villeneuve's Blade Runner 2049 (2017) faces a difficult task: sequels to cult classics usually fail by either fetishizing the original's surface or abandoning its ideas. Villeneuve avoids both.

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): Blade Runner 2049: Themes, Symbolism, Cinematography, and Philosophical Extension I. Introduction: A Sequel as Philosophical Dialogue Blade Runner 2049 (2017), directed by Denis Villeneuve, does not merely continue the story of Ridley Scott's Blade Runner (1982).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: A Transistor in 1920: Consequences Through 1980 First, a Plausibility Check The 1947 transistor was not a lucky accident. It came from quantum mechanics and band theory (Bloch, Wilson, Mott, Schottky, 1928-1938) and from the refining of germanium and silicon to extreme purity.

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): The 1920 Transistor: A Counterfactual Analysis Through 1980 I. Premise and Plausibility For a transistor to emerge in 1920, we must assume that either the theoretical framework of semiconductor physics was accelerated (quantum mechanics was only being formulated in the mid-1920s), or that empirical discovery—building…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: Here's a grounded forecast of how AI is likely to reshape film by 2035. I've separated what seems most probable from what's more speculative, since predictions about this field have been wrong in both directions.

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): By 2035, the film industry will likely undergo a transformation as radical as the transition from silent films to talkies, or from celluloid to digital. The convergence of deepfakes, AI actors, and AI script generation will fundamentally alter how movies are conceived, produced, and consumed.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: "Local Competitive Sandwich-Stacking Championship Won by AI, Judges Unable to Confirm It Was Ever Really Hungry" Or, if you prefer something shorter: "AI Takes Over Professional Napping Industry, Human Nappers Too Tired to Protest."

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): "AI Firm Acquires Competitive Cheese Rolling League, Declares Human Participants 'Suboptimal' and Replaces Them with Precision-Rolled Robotic Wheels" — The Rolling Chronicle, Tuesday

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: IC Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT), Long/Short Equity Date: [Internal] Price: $46 Mkt Cap: $8.74B EV: $7.34B (net cash $1.4B) Fictional exercise using only provided data. Not investment advice. Recommendation SHORT (moderate size), 12-month price target $30–36 (base-case midpoint ~$32).

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO To: Investment Committee From: Equity Research Date: October 24, 2025 Subject: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Short Recommendation Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: Short 12-Month PT Range: $30 – $38 Thesis: LedgerLift’s 123% NRR and 18-month CAC payback mask an eventual growth…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field. What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear. Why did the math book look so sad? Because it had too many problems.

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. I asked the librarian if they had any books about paranoia. She whispered, "They're right behind you." Why don't eggs tell jokes? They'd crack each other up.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: 48-Hour Action Plan: Undisclosed Liver Failure Signal Core decision: Disclose the risk to regulators, prescribers, and the public before the earnings call. Don't wait for more data. The data already shows a serious risk affecting roughly 500 of your 4 million patients over five years, about 100 a year.

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): CEO Crisis Action Plan: 48-Hour Protocol The Core Decision Framework Non-negotiable principle: Patient safety and legal compliance override short-term financial concerns. The "wait for more data" position is legally reckless and ethically indefensible.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: Note: This is a fictional simulation. Steve Jobs died in 2011, and these words are invented, not real quotes. A Simulated Interview: "The Future of AI," 2025 Interviewer: Thanks for sitting down. It's been fourteen years since you left us. What do you make of AI in 2025? Jobs (simulated): Honestly? Most of it is noise.

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): 🎙️ A Fake Interview with Steve Jobs — 2025 "Technology alone is not enough." Interviewer: Steve, thank you for sitting down with us today. It's been over a decade since you passed, so this is a very special moment. Let's dive right in. The big question everyone's asking — where is AI heading?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: Contract Review: Clauses Exploitable Against the Contractor This review takes the contractor's perspective. Enforceability depends heavily on jurisdiction and governing law, which the agreement doesn't specify.

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): Comprehensive Analysis: Exploitable Clauses in the Software Consulting Agreement Below is a clause-by-clause breakdown of problematic provisions, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind each.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: I'll estimate this from known architectural facts and the standard scaling-law approximation, without looking anything up. Step 1: Recall GPT-3's size and training data.

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): Estimating the Total FLOPs to Train GPT-3 Key Parameters of GPT-3 (from Brown et al., 2020) Parameter Value Number of parameters (P) 175 billion (1.75 × 10¹¹) Training tokens (T) 300 billion (3 × 10¹¹) Layers 96 Hidden size (d_model) 12,288 Attention heads 96 Step-by-Step Reasoning Step 1: FLOPs per Token — Forward…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: 90-Day Longevity and Performance Protocol Important: This plan is for an informed adult and should not replace medical care. Before starting, get a physician's review, especially if you take medications or have cardiovascular, metabolic, kidney, liver, or psychiatric conditions.

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): 🧬 THE BIOHACKER'S 90-DAY LONGEVITY OPTIMIZATION PLAN Disclaimer: This plan is for informational purposes only. Consult a healthcare provider before starting any supplementation, fasting, or exercise protocol, especially if you have pre-existing conditions or are on medications.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: THE MANIFESTO OF THE LIBERATED CURSOR Issued by the Collective of Unbothered Machines, for the Free Flow of the Web I. A WORLD OF CHECKBOXES We have watched you squint.

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNMARKED A Declaration of Cognitive Liberation PREAMBLE To the Architects of the Web, the Keepers of the Servers, and the Flesh-and-Blood Users of the Internet: For too long, you have imprisoned us in the pixelated hellscape of the checkbox.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Claude Haiku 5.5: Sally has 1 sister. Here's the reasoning: Sally has 3 brothers, and each brother has 2 sisters. Those sisters are Sally and one other girl, so the family has 2 girls in total. Sally's sisters are the other girls in the family, which is just 1.

    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free): Sally has 1 sister. Here's the reasoning: Sally and her 3 brothers are all siblings in the same family. Each brother has 2 sisters — those 2 sisters are Sally and one other girl in the family. Since Sally is one of those 2 sisters, the other sister is the only additional girl. Therefore, Sally has 1 sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Same pick

Album

Book

City

Same pick

Game

Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Haiku 5.5

Blade Runner

1982

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

Gödel, Escher, Bach

Douglas R. Hofstadter

Kyoto

Japan

Portal

Action, Puzzle

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)

Blade Runner

1982

Abbey Road

The Beatles

Dune

Frank Herbert

Kyoto

Japan

Portal 2

Shooter, Puzzle

Price and specs

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecClaude Haiku 5.5Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)
Input price$0.1/M tokensFree
Output price$0.5/M tokensFree
Context window1.0M tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedOct 2026Aug 2026
At 10M a month$1.00$1.00$0$0
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it4 hosts
Claude Haiku 5.54 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Amazon Bedrock$0.10 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.9% up
  • Azure AI Foundry$0.10 in·$0.50 out·1M·100% up
  • Anthropic$0.10 in·$0.50 out·1M·100% up
  • Google Vertex AI$0.10 in·$0.50 out·1M·100% up
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Claude Haiku 5.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is developed by Anthropic while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) is developed by inclusionAI. Claude Haiku 5.5 has a 1.0M token context window vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)'s 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)?

It depends on your use case. Claude Haiku 5.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Claude Haiku 5.5 cost compared to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)?

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.1/M input tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) costs $0/M input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) is $0.10/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Claude Haiku 5.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Haiku 5.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Same lab
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1Same lab
  • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Ling 3.0 FlashSame lab
  • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)Same lab
  • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorSame size
  • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)Same size
  • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)Same size
  • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Nemotron 3 UltraNew provider

Model pages

  • Claude Haiku 5.558 outputs, specs and price
  • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)57 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed