Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Claude Opus 4.6vsDeepSeek R1 0528
Updated Feb 2026

Claude Opus 4.6vsDeepSeek R1 0528

DeepSeek R1 0528 is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6 at $0/M vs $5/M input tokens.

Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek R1 0528 compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecClaude Opus 4.6DeepSeek R1 0528
Input price$5/M tokensFree
Output price$25/M tokensFree
Context window1.0M tokens164K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedFeb 2026May 2025
SWE-bench Verified80.8%57.6%
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6
DeepSeek R1 0528
DeepSeek R1 0528Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge: newer, bigger context window.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.6
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
DeepSeek R1 0528
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it

8 hosts, cheapest first

Claude Opus 4.64 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Amazon Bedrock$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·99.9% upAzure AI Foundry$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·97.2% upAnthropic$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·99.9% upGoogle Vertex AI$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·100% up
DeepSeek R1 05284 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.50 in·$2.15 out·164k·100% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.50 in·$2.18 out·164k·99.3% upSStreamLake$0.57 in·$2.29 out·128k·99.3% upNNovitafp8$0.70 in·$2.50 out·164k·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
48%

DeepSeek R1 0528 uses 10.0x more transitions

Claude Opus 4.6
DeepSeek R1 0528
56%Vocabulary59%
33wSentence Length14w
0.73Hedging0.47
5.3Bold5.1
2.7Lists3.6
1.16Emoji0.82
1.23Headings0.25
0.02Transitions0.24
Based on 26 + 20 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

DeepSeek R1 0528 logoOx Alpha logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
DeepSeek R1 0528 logoMiniMax M3 logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs MiniMax M3New provider
DeepSeek R1 0528 logoGemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)New provider
DeepSeek R1 0528 logoGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05New provider
DeepSeek R1 0528 logoGrok 4.20 Beta logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Grok 4.20 BetaNew provider
DeepSeek R1 0528 logoGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent BetaNew provider
DeepSeek R1 0528 logoGrok 4.3 logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Grok 4.3New provider
DeepSeek R1 0528 logoGrok 4.5 logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Grok 4.5New provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed