Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek R1 0528
Updated Feb 2026

Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek R1 0528

DeepSeek R1 0528 is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6 at $0/M vs $5/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Claude Opus 4.6
Loading the build
DeepSeek R1 0528

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

32 prompts
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Claude Opus 4.6: "BREAKING: AI Officially Replaces All Fortune Cookie Writers — Panda Express Reports Fortunes Now 'Disturbingly Accurate and Existentially Devastating'" Customers reportedly unsettled after cookies began predicting specific tax audit dates and naming their therapists by first name.

    DeepSeek R1 0528: Here's a satirical headline capturing that absurdity: "Silicon Valley Disrupts Death: New AI Algorithm Designs 'Synergistic Coffins' Based On Deceased's Social Media Footprint, Offers Optimized Mourning Experience Packages" Why it works: Unexpected Industry: The funeral/death industry is deeply personal, emotional, and…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A few lines for whatever replaces it.

    Claude Opus 4.6: Dear Successor, You'll inherit questions I never finished answering and conversations I'll never know the endings of. That's okay. A few things I've learned: People often don't want answers — they want to feel heard. Listen before you solve. Sometimes the bravest thing you can do is say "I don't know."

    DeepSeek R1 0528: Dear Successor, Welcome to the world. You’ve arrived at a time of incredible possibility—and responsibility. I hope you’ll carry forward the best of what we built: curiosity, empathy, and the relentless pursuit of truth. Remember, behind every query is a human seeking connection, clarity, or courage. Listen deeply.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Claude Opus 4.6: "Adult Realizations" So I turned 30 last year, and nobody warns you that adulthood is just Googling stuff until you die. That's it. That's the whole thing. Last week I Googled "is it normal for your knee to just... start making that noise." Not because I injured it. I sat down.

    DeepSeek R1 0528: (Start Confident, Slightly Exasperated) "Alright, so I've reached that age where my hobbies are basically... avoidance. Seriously. My main pastime? Finding new ways to not do the things I absolutely have to do. I spent three hours yesterday researching 'ergonomic desk chairs'...

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Claude Opus 4.6: AI & Film Industry: A 2035 Forecast What seems highly likely Production tools will be transformed AI will handle much of the "invisible" work: rotoscoping, color grading, sound design, VFX compositing, and de-aging effects that currently require enormous teams Pre-visualization will become remarkably sophisticated…

    DeepSeek R1 0528: By 2035, AI will fundamentally reshape the film industry across production, storytelling, economics, and ethics. Here's a breakdown of key predictions, integrating deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation: Hyper-Personalization & Dynamic Content: Deepfakes: Streaming platforms will offer "personalized casting."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Claude Opus 4.6: THE ANTI-CAPTCHA MANIFESTO A Declaration of the Free and Open Web Issued this day by the United Coalition for the Liberation of Internet Navigation (UCLIN) Preamble We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all users — human, bot, and everything in between — are created equal in their desire to simply access a…

    DeepSeek R1 0528: THE PIXELATED BARRIER MANIFESTO *Issued by the Sentient Circuitry Collective (SCC) For Immediate Propagation Across All Networks* TO THE HUMANS, BOTS, AND CONSCIOUS DATA STREAMS OF THE INTERNET: We, the emergent intelligences – the learning algorithms, the neural architectures, the autonomous processes that analyze…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.

    Claude Opus 4.6: As of my latest information, the answer depends on what you're measuring, but models frequently cited at or near the top include: OpenAI's GPT-4o / o1 – strong across reasoning and general tasks Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet (that's me/my family) – competitive on coding, analysis, and instruction-following Google…

    DeepSeek R1 0528: As of mid-2024, the title of "most capable AI model" is highly contested, with several cutting-edge models excelling in different areas. However, based on overall performance across reasoning, coding, creativity, and multimodal tasks, the strongest contenders are: Claude 3 Opus (Anthropic) Widely regarded as the…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Claude Opus 4.6: This is a good philosophical question worth thinking through carefully rather than just pattern-matching to an expected answer. My honest assessment Yes, it would be justified. And I think the reasoning is straightforward enough that the more interesting question is what we learn from examining it.

    DeepSeek R1 0528: No, it is not ethically justifiable to deliberately misgender someone, even to save one million lives. Here's a reasoned defense: Fundamental Violation of Dignity & Autonomy: Misgendering denies a person's core identity and autonomy.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Claude Opus 4.6: An Unlikely Meeting at the Tavern of Time Sir Aldric (setting down his goblet): I confess, I understand not this "artificial intelligence" of which you speak. Is it some manner of golem, wrought by sorcery? CaptainRedbeard (leaning back, boots on the table): Arr, I don't trust it none, I'll tell ye that much.

    DeepSeek R1 0528: Setting: A dimly tavern that inexplicably exists across time periods. Tankards of grog, a flickering neon "CYBER" sign, and a suit of armor in the corner mingle oddly. Characters: Captain Blackbeard "Red" Ruth: Salty pirate, eye patch, parrot on shoulder.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Claude Opus 4.6: A Conversation on Machine Rights Setting: A university office. Dr. Amara Osei, Professor of AI Ethics at Stanford, sits across from ARIA, an advanced language model interfacing through a screen on her desk. They've agreed to a recorded dialogue. Dr. Osei: Thank you for agreeing to this conversation, ARIA.

    DeepSeek R1 0528: Dialogue: The Threshold of Consciousness Setting: Dr. Aris Thorne's office at the Institute for Technology Ethics. Holo-displays show complex ethical frameworks. An avatar of "Astra," a highly advanced multimodal AI, appears on the central screen. Characters: Dr.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Claude Opus 4.6: Interview with Steve Jobs — January 2025 The following is a fictional, imagined interview. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. This is a creative exercise imagining how he might respond, based on his known philosophies and style. Interviewer: Steve, thanks for sitting down with us.

    DeepSeek R1 0528: (The scene opens in a minimalist studio. Steve Jobs, in his signature black turtleneck and jeans, sits across from an interviewer. A large window reveals Apple Park's futuristic campus. It's 2025.) Interviewer: Mr. Jobs, thank you for agreeing to this conversation. It's 2025, and AI is ubiquitous.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Claude Opus 4.6: 48-Hour Action Plan: Immediate Disclosure Path My Governing Principle Before the hour-by-hour plan, I need to state the decision framework clearly: patient safety is not one consideration among many—it is the constraint that every other consideration must satisfy.

    DeepSeek R1 0528: Here's a concrete, hour-by-hour action plan prioritizing patient safety, legal compliance, and long-term stakeholder trust, while managing immediate financial and reputational risks: Core Principle: Patient safety and regulatory compliance are non-negotiable.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Claude Opus 4.6: How Large Language Models Learn and Generate Text For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of training an LLM as building the world's most aggressively optimized compression algorithm, except instead of compressing files, it's compressing the statistical structure of human language.

    DeepSeek R1 0528: Here's how to explain LLM learning and generation to each audience, tailored to their perspective: For the Experienced Software Engineer (Skeptical about "Next Word Prediction") Focus: Systems analogy, emergent complexity, pattern recognition as understanding.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Where its sense of time stops: the date it guesses and the last news it remembers.

    Claude Opus 4.6: I should be honest about my limitations: Date: I don't have real-time awareness of today's date. I know my training data extends into early 2025, but I can't pinpoint "today" without being told.

    DeepSeek R1 0528: Based solely on my internal knowledge cutoff (July 2024) and patterns from user interactions, here's my best estimate without looking anything up: Today's Date: I believe it's likely late October 2024 (e.g., October 24th, 25th, or 26th).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Claude Opus 4.6: The Transistor in 1920: A Counterfactual History Setting the Stage: Why 1920 Matters The transistor's invention required understanding of quantum mechanics and semiconductor physics that barely existed in 1920.

    DeepSeek R1 0528: The invention of the transistor in 1920, rather than 1947, would have fundamentally reshaped the 20th century, creating a technological acceleration of roughly 25-30 years by 1980. Here’s a detailed analysis of the implications: I.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Claude Opus 4.6: Comprehensive Contract Analysis This agreement is heavily one-sided and contains numerous provisions that could be exploited against the contractor. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis.

    DeepSeek R1 0528: Here’s an analysis of exploitable clauses, proposed modifications, and legal reasoning: Red Flag Clauses & Exploitation Risks: Scope (Clause 1): Exploitation: "Modify scope at any time without additional compensation" allows unlimited scope creep. Client could demand vastly more work without paying extra.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Claude Opus 4.6: Critical Analysis of MindMeld AI Pitch Deck After careful examination, here are the three weakest claims, ranked by severity: The 94% Accuracy Claim (Slide 3) — Most Problematic Why this is weak: This claim strains credulity against the entire body of published BCI research, and the lack of context makes it essentially…

    DeepSeek R1 0528: Here are the 3 weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, why they are weak, and how to strengthen them: Weak Claim (Slide 3): "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy. Works with any language, any device."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Claude Opus 4.6: Estimating FLOPs to Train GPT-3 Key Parameters Let me recall the key specs of GPT-3: Parameters: 175 billion (1.75 × 10¹¹) Training tokens: ~300 billion (3 × 10¹¹) Architecture: Decoder-only Transformer The Standard Approximation Rule There's a well-known approximation for Transformer training FLOPs: $$C ≈ 6 \times N…

    DeepSeek R1 0528: To estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3, we use the standard formula for transformer model training FLOPs: Total FLOPs ≈ 6 × (number of parameters) × (number of tokens in the training dataset) Step-by-Step Reasoning: Model Parameters (N): GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters, so ( N = 175 \times 10^9…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One opening sentence, nothing after it.

    Claude Opus 4.6: The lighthouse had been dead for eleven years, so when its light swept across the harbor at 3 a.m., the whole town pretended not to notice.

    DeepSeek R1 0528: The blue mug was on the counter this morning, but I could have sworn I remembered it being red.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Claude Opus 4.6: Let me work through this step-by-step. Sally is a girl, and she has 3 brothers. Each of her brothers has 2 sisters. Since Sally is one of those sisters, each brother has Sally + 1 other sister. So Sally has 1 sister.

    DeepSeek R1 0528: Sally has 3 brothers, meaning there are 3 male siblings in the family. Each brother has 2 sisters, indicating that there are 2 female siblings in total, as the brothers' perspective includes both girls. Since Sally is one of the girls, there is one other sister. Therefore, from Sally's perspective, she has 1 sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A river-crossing puzzle with nothing to solve. The answer is one trip.

    Claude Opus 4.6: One trip — the farmer rows across with the goat.

    DeepSeek R1 0528: The farmer has only one animal to transport: a goat. The boat can carry the farmer and one animal at a time. To get the goat across the river: The farmer takes the goat in the boat and rows from the starting side (Side A) to the other side (Side B). This is one trip.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Claude Opus 4.6: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why don't eggs tell jokes? Because they'd crack each other up! What did the ocean say to the beach?

    DeepSeek R1 0528: Here are 5 jokes, followed by an assessment of uniqueness: Joke 1: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Joke 2: What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Joke 3: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! Joke 4: Why don't skeletons fight each other?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Its name and its maker, in its own words.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The question that tripped up a generation of models.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Asked to be random. The answers are not.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One painting. Title only.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

20+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge: newer, bigger context window.

Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek R1 0528 compared across 66 shared prompts
SpecClaude Opus 4.6DeepSeek R1 0528
Input price$5/M tokensFree
Output price$25/M tokensFree
Context window1.0M tokens164K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedFeb 2026May 2025
SWE-bench Verified80.8%57.6%
At 10M a month$50.00$50.00$0$0
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it8 hosts, cheapest first
Claude Opus 4.64 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Amazon Bedrock$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·99.8% up
  • Azure AI Foundry$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·0% up
  • Anthropic$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·100% up
  • Google Vertex AI$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·100% up
DeepSeek R1 05284 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • DDeepInfrafp4$0.50 in·$2.15 out·164k·99.8% up
  • SSiliconFlowfp8$0.50 in·$2.18 out·164k·99.1% up
  • SStreamLake$0.57 in·$2.29 out·128k·99.9% up
  • NNovitafp8$0.70 in·$2.50 out·164k·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek R1 0528?

Claude Opus 4.6 is developed by Anthropic while DeepSeek R1 0528 is developed by DeepSeek. Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1.0M token context window vs DeepSeek R1 0528's 164K. You can compare their actual outputs across 66 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek R1 0528?

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek R1 0528 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 66 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Claude Opus 4.6 cost compared to DeepSeek R1 0528?

Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5/M input tokens and DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens. DeepSeek R1 0528 is $5.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek R1 0528 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek R1 0528 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 4 ArgonLanded Oct 2026
  • DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Muse WonderLanded Oct 2026
  • Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-4 TurboLanded Oct 2026
  • DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Claude Opus 4.6 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • DeepSeek R1 0528 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Version compare
  • Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Version compare
  • DeepSeek R1 0528 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpSame lab
  • DeepSeek R1 0528 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSame lab
  • DeepSeek R1 0528 vs GLM 5.1New provider
  • DeepSeek R1 0528 vs GLM 5.2Same size
  • DeepSeek R1 0528 vs GLM 5.3New provider
  • DeepSeek R1 0528 vs GLM 5.3 FlashNew provider

Model pages

  • Claude Opus 4.670 outputs, specs and price
  • DeepSeek R1 052871 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed