Claude Opus 4.6 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

Compare Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic against Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI, context windows of 1.0M vs 262K, tested across 44 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Claude Opus 4.6 and Google: Gemma 4 31B are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. Context windows: 1000K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4.6 and Google: Gemma 4 31B

Claude Opus 4.6 is made by anthropic while Google: Gemma 4 31B is from google. Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1000K token context window compared to Google: Gemma 4 31B's 262K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B.

Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6
Google: Gemma 4 31B
Google: Gemma 4 31B

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Google: Gemma 4 31B is 63x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

Google: Gemma 4 31B uses 5.8x more transitions

Claude Opus 4.6
Google: Gemma 4 31B
53%Vocabulary57%
35wSentence Length18w
0.68Hedging0.37
5.2Bold7.1
2.9Lists4.0
0.21Emoji0.24
1.34Headings0.94
0.03Transitions0.16
Based on 23 + 23 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Opus 4.6Google: Gemma 4 31B
FAQ