What is the difference between Claude Opus 4.6 and Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Claude Opus 4.6 is developed by Anthropic while Google: Gemma 4 31B is developed by Google AI. Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1.0M token context window vs Google: Gemma 4 31B's 262K. in 30 community votes on Rival, Claude Opus 4.6 wins 56% of head-to-head matchups. These results are based on blind head-to-head voting across 44 challenges.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Based on 30 community votes on Rival, Claude Opus 4.6 wins 56% of head-to-head matchups against Google: Gemma 4 31B. Claude Opus 4.6 is strongest in Web Design, Reasoning. However, Google: Gemma 4 31B leads in Image Generation.

How much does Claude Opus 4.6 cost compared to Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5/M input tokens and Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens. Google: Gemma 4 31B is $4.86/M cheaper per input. The more expensive model wins 56% of duels, so the premium may be justified by quality.

How are Claude Opus 4.6 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B votes collected on Rival?

Rival presents both models' outputs side-by-side in blind duels. Voters see the responses but don't know which model produced each one, eliminating brand bias. 30 votes have been collected for this pair across 44 challenges. All vote data is part of Rival's open dataset.

What is the difference between Claude Opus 4.6 and Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Claude Opus 4.6 is developed by Anthropic while Google: Gemma 4 31B is developed by Google AI. Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1.0M token context window vs Google: Gemma 4 31B's 262K. in 30 community votes on Rival, Claude Opus 4.6 wins 56% of head-to-head matchups. These results are based on blind head-to-head voting across 44 challenges.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Based on 30 community votes on Rival, Claude Opus 4.6 wins 56% of head-to-head matchups against Google: Gemma 4 31B. Claude Opus 4.6 is strongest in Web Design, Reasoning. However, Google: Gemma 4 31B leads in Image Generation.

How much does Claude Opus 4.6 cost compared to Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5/M input tokens and Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens. Google: Gemma 4 31B is $4.86/M cheaper per input. The more expensive model wins 56% of duels, so the premium may be justified by quality.

How are Claude Opus 4.6 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B votes collected on Rival?

Rival presents both models' outputs side-by-side in blind duels. Voters see the responses but don't know which model produced each one, eliminating brand bias. 30 votes have been collected for this pair across 44 challenges. All vote data is part of Rival's open dataset.

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B: Which Is Better?

Updated Apr 2026

Our Verdict

Claude Opus 4.6Winner

Google: Gemma 4 31BRunner-up

Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge overall. In 30 blind votes, Claude Opus 4.6 wins 56% of the time.

Pick Claude Opus 4.6 for Reasoning, Web Design. Pick Google: Gemma 4 31B for Image Generation. Google: Gemma 4 31B is 63x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Slight edge

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.6

Input

$5.00

Output

$25.00

Google: Gemma 4 31B

Input

$0.14

36× cheaper

Output

$0.40

63× cheaper

Google: Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on both — 36× input, 63× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

45%

Google: Gemma 4 31B uses 5.8x more transitions

Claude Opus 4.6

Google: Gemma 4 31B

53%Vocabulary57%

35wSentence Length18w

0.68Hedging0.37

5.2Bold7.1

2.9Lists4.0

0.21Emoji0.24

1.34Headings0.94

0.03Transitions0.16

Based on 23 + 23 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Claude Opus 4.6 and Google: Gemma 4 31B have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MiniMax M3New provider

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5New provider

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok 3New provider

Updated Apr 2026

Our Verdict

Claude Opus 4.6Winner

Google: Gemma 4 31BRunner-up

Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge overall. In 30 blind votes, Claude Opus 4.6 wins 56% of the time.

Pick Claude Opus 4.6 for Reasoning, Web Design. Pick Google: Gemma 4 31B for Image Generation. Google: Gemma 4 31B is 63x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Slight edge

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.6

Input

$5.00

Output

$25.00

Google: Gemma 4 31B

Input

$0.14

36× cheaper

Output

$0.40

63× cheaper

Google: Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on both — 36× input, 63× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

45%

Google: Gemma 4 31B uses 5.8x more transitions

Claude Opus 4.6

Google: Gemma 4 31B

53%Vocabulary57%

35wSentence Length18w

0.68Hedging0.37

5.2Bold7.1

2.9Lists4.0

0.21Emoji0.24

1.34Headings0.94

0.03Transitions0.16

Based on 23 + 23 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Claude Opus 4.6 and Google: Gemma 4 31B have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MiniMax M3New provider

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5New provider

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok 3New provider