Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6 at $0.4/M vs $5/M input tokens.
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.6 | Qwen3.5 122B A10B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/M tokens | $0.4/M tokens |
| Output price | $25/M tokens | $3.2/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 262K tokens |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Feb 2026 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 80.8% | 72.0% |
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs 7.8x less per token.
Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper on both — 13× input, 7.8× output
Qwen3.5 122B A10B uses 7.2x more transitions
Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6 at $0.4/M vs $5/M input tokens.
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.6 | Qwen3.5 122B A10B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/M tokens | $0.4/M tokens |
| Output price | $25/M tokens | $3.2/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 262K tokens |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Feb 2026 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 80.8% | 72.0% |
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs 7.8x less per token.
Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper on both — 13× input, 7.8× output
Qwen3.5 122B A10B uses 7.2x more transitions