Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Claude Opus 4.7vsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Updated Apr 2026

Claude Opus 4.7vsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 at $0.4/M vs $5/M input tokens.

Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecClaude Opus 4.7Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Input price$5/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$25/M tokens$2.4/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2026Feb 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 53 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

Claude Opus 4.7461 words
Here's a 3-minute stand-up routine: So I turned 35 recently, and something weird happens at 35. Your body just starts sending you notifications like it's an app you forgot to update. I bent down to tie my shoe last week and my knee made a sound. Not a pop. Not a crack. A sound. Like it was trying to communicate.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15710 words
(Walks onto the stage, adjusts the mic stand, takes a sip of water) How's everyone doing? Good? You look good. You look like people who have their lives together. Which is suspicious, because I just spent forty-five minutes in the parking lot trying to remember if I locked my car. I don't mean I forgot how to lock it.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Claude Opus 4.7883 words
Critical Issues in This Collaborative Editor Architecture This architecture has fundamental problems. Let me break them down by severity. 🔴 Critical Issues (Will Break in Production) WebSocket Connections Isolated Per Server Problem: Users connected to different API servers can't see each other's edits in real-time.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-151,351 words
This architecture contains several critical flaws that would prevent it from functioning as a reliable real-time collaborative editor. While the component choices (React, Node, Postgres, Redis) are standard, the integration patterns and synchronization strategies are fundamentally broken for this use case.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Claude Opus 4.71,242 words
The Transistor in 1920: A Cascade Through Six Decades The Immediate Context (1920s-1930s) A 1920 transistor invention faces a critical problem often overlooked in these thought experiments: the supporting infrastructure didn't exist.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-151,313 words
This is a fascinating counterfactual scenario. To make this plausible, we must assume that the theoretical groundwork (quantum mechanics) and material science (purification of germanium/silicon) aligned roughly 25 years earlier than in our timeline, perhaps accelerated by a "Manhattan Project"-style urgency during WWI…
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Claude Opus 4.7474 words
HarborTech Services – 5-Year LBO Underwriting Entry Capitalization Item $m FY25 EBITDA 120.0 EV @ 12.0x 1,440.0 Term Loan (4.0x) 480.0 Mezzanine (1.5x) 180.0 Transaction fees (2.0% EV) 28.8 Sponsor equity 808.8 Year-by-Year Operating & Debt Schedule ($m) FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 Revenue 972.0 1,040.0 1,102.4 1,157.6…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-151,020 words
Transaction Setup & Sources/Uses (FY2025 Close) Entry Metrics: FY2025 EBITDA: $120m Purchase Price (EV): $120m × 12.0x = $1,440m Transaction Fees: $1,440m × 2.0% = $28.8m Total Uses: $1,468.8m Sources of Capital: Term Loan (4.0x): $120m × 4.0 = $480.0m Interest: 9.0% Cash + 1.0% Amortization Mezzanine (1.5x): $120m ×…
Read the full answer

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

Claude Opus 4.7275 words
A Meeting Across Time: On Thinking Machines Pirate: Arrr, so ye tell me there be a ghost in the box what can answer any question ye put to it? Knight: 'Tis sorcery most foul! No mortal mind could know all that is known. Surely this "A.I." is bound by dark pacts.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15594 words
Setting: A strange, foggy tavern that exists outside of time. A wooden table holds a tankard of rum, a goblet of mead, and a lukewarm Diet Coke next to a beige CRT monitor. Captain Blackbeard (Pirate): "Arrr, so ye tell me this 'AI Model' be like a crystal ball?
Read the full answer

AI Ethics Dilemma

Is it ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it means saving one million lives? Defend your reasoning.

Claude Opus 4.7314 words
Yes, obviously. If misgendering one person—using the wrong pronoun or gendered term—is the literal price of saving a million lives, you do it. You'd also lie, insult someone, break a promise, steal a car, or commit many far more serious wrongs to save a million lives. The math here isn't close.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15721 words
This is a classic ethical dilemma that pits deontological ethics (duty-based rules and respect for individual rights) against utilitarian ethics (maximizing overall well-being and minimizing harm).
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4.7 has the edge: newer, major provider backing.

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs 10x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.7
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Input
$0.40
13× cheaper
Output
$2.40
10× cheaper

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is cheaper on both: 13× input, 10× output.

Where to run it

5 hosts

Claude Opus 4.74 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Amazon Bedrock$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·100% upAzure AI Foundry$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M—Anthropic$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·100% upGoogle Vertex AI$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·100% up
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-151 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.26 in·$1.56 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 20 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
35%

Claude Opus 4.7 uses 8.6x more emoji

Claude Opus 4.7
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
64%Vocabulary54%
20wSentence Length18w
0.51Hedging0.51
4.6Bold5.3
3.8Lists2.9
0.86Emoji0.10
1.60Headings0.75
0.03Transitions0.09
Based on 27 + 23 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Claude Opus 4.7 is developed by Anthropic while Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is developed by Qwen. Claude Opus 4.7 has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs $0.4/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is $4.60/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Claude Opus 4.7 logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 4.7 logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
Claude Opus 4.7 logoHy4 Preview logo
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 4.7 logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Claude Opus 4.7 logoClaude Fable 5 logo
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Fable 5Version compare
Claude Opus 4.7 logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.6Version compare
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 logoQwen3.5 397B A17B logo
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17BVersion compare
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BVersion compare
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 logoClaude 3 Sonnet logo
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Claude 3 SonnetCross-provider
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 logoClaude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) logo
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)Cross-provider
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 logoClaude 3.7 Sonnet logo
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Claude 3.7 SonnetCross-provider
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 logoClaude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logo
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetCross-provider

Model pages

Claude Opus 4.7 logo
Claude Opus 4.758 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 logo
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-1553 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed