Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Compare Claude Opus 4.8 by Anthropic against Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 262K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.8
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Opus 4.8 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 88x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.8
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
70× cheaper
Output
$0.28
88× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 70× input, 88× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
63%
Claude Opus 4.8 uses 3.7x more hedging
Claude Opus 4.8
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
60%Vocabulary54%
19wSentence Length14w
0.46Hedging0.12
4.7Bold7.5
3.2Lists4.2
0.78Emoji0.68
1.15Headings0.93
0.04Transitions0.12
Based on 27 + 16 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
