Compare Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic against DeepSeek V4 Flash by DeepSeek, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Claude Opus 4 and DeepSeek V4 Flash are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for DeepSeek V4 Flash. Context windows: 200K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude Opus 4 is made by anthropic while DeepSeek V4 Flash is from deepseek. Claude Opus 4 has a 200K token context window compared to DeepSeek V4 Flash's 1049K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for DeepSeek V4 Flash.
DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on both — 107× input, 268× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
DeepSeek V4 Flash is 268x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Claude Opus 4 uses 11.2x more emoji
Compare Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic against DeepSeek V4 Flash by DeepSeek, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Claude Opus 4 and DeepSeek V4 Flash are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for DeepSeek V4 Flash. Context windows: 200K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude Opus 4 is made by anthropic while DeepSeek V4 Flash is from deepseek. Claude Opus 4 has a 200K token context window compared to DeepSeek V4 Flash's 1049K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for DeepSeek V4 Flash.
DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on both — 107× input, 268× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
DeepSeek V4 Flash is 268x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Claude Opus 4 uses 11.2x more emoji