Claude Opus 4
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Claude Opus 4 vs GLM 4.7 Flash
Compare Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic against GLM 4.7 Flash by Zhipu AI, context windows of 200K vs 200K, tested across 35 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or GLM 4.7 Flash?
Claude Opus 4 and GLM 4.7 Flash are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.07/M for GLM 4.7 Flash. Context windows: 200K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4 and GLM 4.7 Flash
Claude Opus 4 is made by anthropic while GLM 4.7 Flash is from zhipu. Claude Opus 4 has a 200K token context window compared to GLM 4.7 Flash's 200K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.07/M for GLM 4.7 Flash.
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4
GLM 4.7 Flash
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
GLM 4.7 Flash is 188x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
76%
Claude Opus 4 uses 11.2x more emoji
Claude Opus 4
GLM 4.7 Flash
64%Vocabulary52%
62wSentence Length15w
0.52Hedging0.33
4.4Bold5.8
9.1Lists4.7
0.11Emoji0.00
1.87Headings0.68
0.27Transitions0.13
Based on 16 + 19 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ