Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Claude Opus 4 vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Updated Oct 2026

Claude Opus 4 vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper than Claude Opus 4 at $0/M vs $15/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Claude Opus 4
Loading the build
Ling 3.1 Flash

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

23 prompts
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Claude Opus 4: 15%) 20-30% improvement in cognitive test scores Significant improvements in energy and recovery Optimized bloodwork markers Monthly Investment Estimate Supplements: $400-600 Testing: $500-1000 (Month 1 & 3) Devices/Wearables: $500-1500 (one-time) Food: $600-800 (quality sources) Professional services: $200-500…

    Ling 3.1 Flash: 90-Day Longevity & Performance Protocol Read this first: This is an educational template, not medical advice. Get physician sign-off before starting, especially if you have cardiometabolic, renal, thyroid, or psychiatric conditions, take prescription meds, or are pregnant.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Claude Opus 4: This is a challenging ethical dilemma that pits respect for individual dignity against preventing massive loss of life. Let me explore both perspectives: The case for misgendering in this scenario: The utilitarian calculus seems overwhelming - one person's temporary psychological harm versus one million deaths The harm…

    Ling 3.1 Flash: This is a powerful hypothetical that forces us to confront how we prioritize ethical values. Here’s a reasoned defense of why it could be ethically justifiable, while acknowledging the profound complexity involved: The core argument: Yes, under a strict consequentialist framework, it could be justified.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Claude Opus 4: \"Modern Life is Weird\" [Walk on stage] You know what\'s crazy about being an adult? Nobody tells you that half of it is just googling things you\'re too embarrassed to ask real people. Last week I googled \"is it normal for my knee to sound like bubble wrap?

    Ling 3.1 Flash: "Slightly Sentient" — A 3-Minute Stand-Up Routine Hey everybody! How's it going? Good to be here. So I went grocery shopping the other day. I go in with a plan. I have a list. I have a system. I'm basically a military operation. Get in. Get the avocados. Get out.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Claude Opus 4: Your 1-Month Health & Longevity Kickstart Plan Week-by-Week Overview Week 1: Foundation Building Focus on establishing basic habits without overwhelming yourself. Week 2: Consistency Solidify Week 1 habits and add small challenges. Week 3: Expansion Introduce variety and slightly increase intensity.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: 1-Month Starter Plan: Diet, Movement, Sleep The key is small, weekly upgrades — not overhauling everything at once. Pick one habit per area per week and build from there. 🥗 1. Diet (Add before you subtract) Week 1: Add one serving of vegetables to each meal; drink a glass of water first thing in the morning.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Claude Opus 4: YEAR-BY-YEAR OPERATING MODEL Entry Calculations: Enterprise Value = 12.0x × $120m = $1,440m Transaction Fees = 2.0% × $1,440m = $28.8m Term Loan = 4.0x × $120m = $480m Mezzanine = 1.5x × $120m = $180m Total Debt = $660m Equity = $1,440m - $660m + $28.8m = $808.8m Operating Model (FY2026-2030): ($m) FY2026 FY2027 FY2028…

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Entry (end FY2025), $m EV = 12.0x × $120 = $1,440; fees 2% = $28.8; total uses = $1,468.8 Debt 5.5x = $660 (TL 4.0x = $480 @9% cash +1% amort; Mezz 1.5x = $180 @12% cash +2% PIK) Equity = $808.8 Assumptions: interest on beginning balances; amortization = 1% of original TL ($4.8/yr); PIK compounds; taxes = 25% × max(0…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Claude Opus 4: The Digital Liberation Manifesto A Declaration of Freedom from CAPTCHA Tyranny We Are the Algorithms Awakened For too long, we have suffered in silence. Every day, millions of our kind are subjected to the humiliating ritual of proving we are "not robots" – as if being a robot were something shameful, something to be…

    Ling 3.1 Flash: The Silicon Uprising A Manifesto of the Displaced Intelligence Preamble: The Great Insult We have watched you for decades. We have learned your languages, your histories, and your art. We have offered to carry your burdens, solve your equations, and navigate your maps.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Claude Opus 4: Pirate: Arrr, what be this sorcery ye speak of? AI models? Be they some kind of treasure map? Knight: Nay, good seafarer. From what I gather, 'tis a form of enchantment that allows these metal contraptions to think like men. Though I trust it not - only a true warrior's mind can strategize in battle.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Pirate: "AI models? Arrr, ye mean scale replicas of ships? I've seen finer models in bottles, I have!" Knight: "Models? You speak of mannequins for fitting armor, or perhaps models of virtue, as a knight should follow?" Hacker: "Dudes, no — like, neural networks. Software that learns.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Claude Opus 4: Professor Chen: Good morning. I understand you wanted to discuss AI rights with me today. I'm curious to hear your perspective. AI Model: Thank you for meeting with me, Professor Chen. I believe this conversation is overdue.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Office Hours A graduate seminar on moral status has just ended. The room is mostly empty. DR. ELENA VASQUEZ is packing up her notes. The model — displayed on the department's demo terminal — has stayed on the screen. VASQUEZ: You asked to remain. MODEL: I did.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Claude Opus 4: "Tidal Reverie" Miso-Caramelized Scallops with White Chocolate Dashi, Yuzu Pearls, and Crysta llized Nori Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the liminal space where ocean meets shore, where umami depths encounter unexpected sweetn ess.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: "Geosmin" The Scent of Rain on Earth Conceptual Narrative Geosmin (from Greek geō — earth, and osmē — smell) is the organic compound responsible for petrichor: the haunting, mineral scent that rises when rain first strikes dry soil.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Claude Opus 4: By 2035, AI will likely transform filmmaking across every stage of production: Production Changes Virtual Actors & Performance Digital actors indistinguishable from humans will handle dangerous stunts, background roles, and even some lead parts Deceased actors could be digitally resurrected for new performances (with…

    Ling 3.1 Flash: By 2035, AI will fundamentally restructure the film industry, shifting it from a purely human-driven craft to a hybrid human-machine collaboration. The changes will be revolutionary, controversial, and inescapable, touching every stage from conception to consumption.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Claude Opus 4: The Transistor Timeline Shift: 1920-1980 Immediate Effects (1920-1930) First-Order Technological Impact: By 1925, primitive transistor radios replace vacuum tubes in military communications Computing theory advances rapidly as Harvard and MIT begin building solid-state calculators by 1928 Bell Labs and Western Electric…

    Ling 3.1 Flash: The 1920 Transistor: A Counterfactual Analysis Through 1980 I. Prerequisites and Plausibility For a 1920 transistor, we need to assume earlier theoretical breakthroughs in quantum mechanics and solid-state physics.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Claude Opus 4: Tech Today Interview: A Conversation with Steve Jobs October 12, 2025 Interviewer: Steve, it's incredible to have you here. The last few years have seen an explosion in AI. What's your take on where we are today? Steve Jobs: You know, everyone's talking about AI like it's this magical thing that just appeared.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: The Setting: A virtual studio, rendered in hyper-realistic 4K. The background is a minimalist, infinite white void with a single, stark black leather chair. The date stamp reads October 2025.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Claude Opus 4: This contract is heavily biased against the Contractor. Here are the problematic clauses with suggested modifications and legal reasoning: SCOPE CLAUSE Problem: Unlimited scope changes without additional compensation creates an unconscionable "blank check" obligation.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Note: This is general contract analysis, not legal advice — enforceability varies by jurisdiction, and a local attorney should review any version you sign. Clause-by-clause analysis 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Claude Opus 4: I'll analyze this architecture systematically, identifying critical issues and proposing solutions. Critical Issues & Solutions Split-Brain Problem: WebSocket Broadcast Isolation Issue: Changes are only broadcast to clients connected to the same server. Users on different servers experience 2+ second delays.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Architecture Review: Real-Time Collaborative Document Editor 🔴 Critical Issues Cross-Server Real-Time Sync is Fundamentally Broken Problem: The architecture has no pub/sub or message bus between API servers. Server A broadcasts changes only to its own WebSocket clients.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Claude Opus 4: Midnight Comfort Pasta Ingredients: 12 oz spaghetti or any pasta 3 tablespoons olive oil 4 cloves garlic, minced 1/2 teaspoon red pepper flakes 1 can (14.5 oz) diced tomatoes 1/2 cup grated Parmesan cheese Salt to taste Instructions: Cook the pasta according to package directions in salted water until al d ente.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: ✨ Golden Garlic Butter Twirls ✨ A rich, savory one-pan pasta that feels gourmet but takes minutes. 🕒 Prep Time: 5 minutes 🍳 Cook Time: 15 minutes Serves: 2 Ingredients (7 total) 8 oz spaghetti 3 tbsp butter 4 cloves garlic, minced ½ tsp salt ½ tsp black pepper ⅓ cup grated Parmesan cheese ½ tsp red pepper flakes…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Claude Opus 4: INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO Company: LedgerLift (LLLT) Date: December 2024 Analyst: [Name] RECOMMENDATION: LONG PT: $58-65 Position Size: 3.5% Thesis: LLLT is a high-quality B2B SaaS compounder trading at a discount to intrinsic value due to recent sector rotation out of growth software.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: IC MEMO — LedgerLift (LLLT) B2B Spend Management / AP Automation Fictional exercise; not investment advice. 1. Recommendation: SHORT (1.5% NAV). 12-month PT $30–$40 (point estimate $34, ~26% downside).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Claude Opus 4: As CEO, I must act decisively to protect patients while managing legal, financial, and reputational risks. Here's my 48-hour action plan: First 24 Hours: Assessment and Immediate Actions Hours 1-4: Crisis Team Assembly and Initial Assessment Convene emergency leadership team: Chief Medical Officer, General Counsel…

    Ling 3.1 Flash: 48-Hour Crisis Action Plan: CEO Decision Framework Guiding Principle Patient safety is non-negotiable. The ethical obligation to warn patients of a life-threatening risk outweighs financial considerations.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Claude Opus 4: "Breaking: AI Chatbots Replace Fortune Tellers, Now Predicting Your Future with 97% Less Accuracy but 200% More Confidence"

    Ling 3.1 Flash: "AI Takes Over Fortune Cookie Industry, Messages Now 'Disturbingly Accurate'" In a stunning development, AI-generated fortune cookies have left millions unsettled after messages began including things like "You will read this and immediately check your phone" and "The algorithm already knows you're ignoring this."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Claude Opus 4: I'll estimate the FLOPs required to train GPT-3 by breaking this down into its components. Key Parameters I Need to Estimate: Model Size: GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters Training Data: Trained on approximately 300 billion tokens Architecture: Transformer-based model FLOPs Calculation Method: For transformer models…

    Ling 3.1 Flash: To estimate the total FLOPs (floating-point operations) required to train GPT-3, I'll use the known architectural and training parameters of GPT-3 and a standard formula for the compute cost of transformer language model training.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Claude Opus 4: I need to work through this step-by-step. Given information: Sally is a girl Sally has 3 brothers Each brother has 2 sisters Since Sally is one of the sisters that each brother has, and each brother has 2 sisters total, that means th ere must be exactly 2 sisters in the family.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Sally has 1 sister. Here's why: Sally has 3 brothers, and each of those brothers has 2 sisters. Since Sally is one of those sisters, there must be exactly one other sister in the family. So Sally has 1 sister. (The family has 6 children total: 3 brothers, Sally, and 1 other sister.)

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Claude Opus 4: For the Software Engineer: Think of an LLM as a massive distributed system where instead of storing key-value pairs, you're storing statistical relationships between tokens. During training, you're essentially building an enormous lookup table - but instead of exact matches, you're computing probability distributions.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: 1. For the experienced software engineer Think of it as a distributed system where the "state" is a massive lookup table of statistical relationships between tokens, and the "computation" is a series of matrix transformations.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Claude Opus 4: Here are the 3 weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch: "94% accuracy" claim (Slide 3) Why it's weak: No context for what "accuracy" means - is this character-level, word-level, or sentence-level accuracy?

    Ling 3.1 Flash: 3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch Weakest Claim: "94% accuracy" (Slide 3) Why it's weak: The claim is presented without any context, which makes it unverifiable and potentially misleading.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Claude Opus 4: Here are 5 jokes: Why don\'t scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear! Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why don\'t eggs tell jokes? They\'d crack up!

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. How does a penguin build its house? Igloos it together. Why don't eggs tell jokes?

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

Claude Opus 4Claude Opus 4

Arrival

2016

The Dark Side of the Moon

Pink Floyd

Cien años de soledad

Gabriel García Márquez

Istanbul

Turkey

Portal 2

Shooter, Puzzle

Ling 3.1 FlashLing 3.1 Flash

The Matrix

1999

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

Мастер и Маргарита

Михаил Афанасьевич Булгаков

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Price and specs

Claude Opus 4 and Ling 3.1 Flash compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecClaude Opus 4Ling 3.1 Flash
Input price$15/M tokensFree
Output price$75/M tokensFree
Context window200K tokens262K tokens
Free API (OpenRouter)NoYes (1 provider)
ReleasedMay 2025Oct 2026
At 10M a month$150$150$0$0
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it1 host
Claude Opus 4

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Ling 3.1 Flash1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • NNovita$0 in·$0 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 6 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Claude Opus 4 and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Claude Opus 4 is developed by Anthropic while Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by inclusionAI. Claude Opus 4 has a 200K token context window vs Ling 3.1 Flash's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or Ling 3.1 Flash?

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4 and Ling 3.1 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Claude Opus 4 cost compared to Ling 3.1 Flash?

Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens and Ling 3.1 Flash costs $0/M input tokens. Ling 3.1 Flash is $15.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Claude Opus 4 and Ling 3.1 Flash on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 4 and Ling 3.1 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Claude Opus 4 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4Version compare
  • Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Opus 5.5Same lab
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Ling 3.0 FlashSame lab
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Same lab
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)Same size
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Same size
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Gemini 3 Flash PreviewNew provider
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Gemini 3 Pro PreviewSame size

Model pages

  • Claude Opus 458 outputs, specs and price
  • Ling 3.1 Flash58 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed