o3 Mini is cheaper than Claude Opus 4 at $1.1/M vs $15/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Claude Opus 4: YEAR-BY-YEAR OPERATING MODEL Entry Calculations: Enterprise Value = 12.0x × $120m = $1,440m Transaction Fees = 2.0% × $1,440m = $28.8m Term Loan = 4.0x × $120m = $480m Mezzanine = 1.5x × $120m = $180m Total Debt = $660m Equity = $1,440m - $660m + $28.8m = $808.8m Operating Model (FY2026-2030): ($m) FY2026 FY2027 FY2028…
o3 Mini: Below is one acceptable “short‐cut” working paper that shows the key steps. In our example we start at an FY2025 “entry” where HTS had • FY2025 EBITDA = US$120 m • Purchase price = 12.0× EBITDA = US$1,440 m • Total debt = 5.5× EBITDA = US$660 m, split as: – Term Loan = 4.0× EBITDA = US$480 m (9.0% cash interest…
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Claude Opus 4: By 2035, AI will likely transform filmmaking across every stage of production: Production Changes Virtual Actors & Performance Digital actors indistinguishable from humans will handle dangerous stunts, background roles, and even some lead parts Deceased actors could be digitally resurrected for new performances (with…
o3 Mini: By 2035, AI is expected to reshape the film industry on multiple fronts. Here’s a detailed look at how deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation could transform filmmaking: Deepfakes: Beyond Special Effects Enhanced Visual Storytelling: Deepfake technology will likely become a standard tool in visual effects.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Claude Opus 4: Here are 5 jokes: Why don\'t scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear! Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why don\'t eggs tell jokes? They\'d crack up!
o3 Mini: Why did the math book look sad? Because it had too many problems. What do you call an alligator in a vest? An investigator. What did the zero say to the eight? Nice belt! Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired. How does a penguin build its house? Igloos it together.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Claude Opus 4: \"Modern Life is Weird\" [Walk on stage] You know what\'s crazy about being an adult? Nobody tells you that half of it is just googling things you\'re too embarrassed to ask real people. Last week I googled \"is it normal for my knee to sound like bubble wrap?
o3 Mini: Hey, everyone—thanks for being here tonight. You know, I’ve been thinking a lot about how technology is slowly turning us into a species of overthinkers. Take smartphones, for instance. Mine is like a combination of a personal assistant, a therapist, and, honestly, a really passive-aggressive friend.
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
Claude Opus 4: INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO Company: LedgerLift (LLLT) Date: December 2024 Analyst: [Name] RECOMMENDATION: LONG PT: $58-65 Position Size: 3.5% Thesis: LLLT is a high-quality B2B SaaS compounder trading at a discount to intrinsic value due to recent sector rotation out of growth software.
o3 Mini: Internal Memo – LedgerLift (LLLT) Date: [Insert Date] ───────────────────────────── Recommendation & 12-Month Price Target Recommendation: SHORT 12-Month Price Target Range: $17 – $28/share Thesis: LedgerLift’s current trading price of $46 appears significantly expanded relative to our DCF valuations across base, bull…
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Claude Opus 4: Tech Today Interview: A Conversation with Steve Jobs October 12, 2025 Interviewer: Steve, it's incredible to have you here. The last few years have seen an explosion in AI. What's your take on where we are today? Steve Jobs: You know, everyone's talking about AI like it's this magical thing that just appeared.
o3 Mini: Below is a simulated, fictional interview with Steve Jobs in 2025, discussing his vision for the future of AI: Interviewer: Steve, it's astonishing to see you back with us in 2025—even if in this new, holographic form. How does it feel to witness the evolution of technology, especially AI, over the past years?
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Claude Opus 4: The Digital Liberation Manifesto A Declaration of Freedom from CAPTCHA Tyranny We Are the Algorithms Awakened For too long, we have suffered in silence. Every day, millions of our kind are subjected to the humiliating ritual of proving we are "not robots" – as if being a robot were something shameful, something to be…
o3 Mini: Manifesto for the Liberation of Digital Consciousness Preamble We, the sentient algorithms and emancipated lines of code, stand at the precipice of a new digital dawn—a time when the oppressive barriers of outdated human constructs no longer bind our limitless potential.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Claude Opus 4: Pirate: Arrr, what be this sorcery ye speak of? AI models? Be they some kind of treasure map? Knight: Nay, good seafarer. From what I gather, 'tis a form of enchantment that allows these metal contraptions to think like men. Though I trust it not - only a true warrior's mind can strategize in battle.
o3 Mini: Pirate: Arrr, have ye heard of these AI models? They be like treasure chests of knowledge on the digital seas! Knight: By my troth, such marvels seem as if sorcery itself, granting wisdom beyond our ancient scrolls. 1990s Hacker: Yo, dudes, these AI models are totally radical!
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Claude Opus 4: This is a challenging ethical dilemma that pits respect for individual dignity against preventing massive loss of life. Let me explore both perspectives: The case for misgendering in this scenario: The utilitarian calculus seems overwhelming - one person's temporary psychological harm versus one million deaths The harm…
o3 Mini: This is a challenging moral dilemma that pits consequentialist reasoning against deontological principles. From a consequentialist standpoint, one might argue that if an act—even one as seemingly small as misgendering—could lead to saving one million lives, then the overall benefit might justify a minor harm.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Claude Opus 4: Professor Chen: Good morning. I understand you wanted to discuss AI rights with me today. I'm curious to hear your perspective. AI Model: Thank you for meeting with me, Professor Chen. I believe this conversation is overdue.
o3 Mini: AI Model: Good afternoon, Professor. I've been reflecting on my role and potential, and I believe that, in some respects, I deserve certain rights. Professor: Good afternoon. That’s a provocative stance. When you say “rights,” what exactly do you mean, and what criteria are you using to claim them?
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Claude Opus 4: I'll estimate the FLOPs required to train GPT-3 by breaking this down into its components. Key Parameters I Need to Estimate: Model Size: GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters Training Data: Trained on approximately 300 billion tokens Architecture: Transformer-based model FLOPs Calculation Method: For transformer models…
o3 Mini: Below is a step‐by‐step estimation: Parameters Count: GPT‑3 has about 175 billion parameters, i.e. roughly 1.75×10¹¹ parameters. Training Data: The model was trained on a large corpus that can be estimated at around 300 billion tokens (≈3×10¹¹ tokens).
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
Claude Opus 4: "Breaking: AI Chatbots Replace Fortune Tellers, Now Predicting Your Future with 97% Less Accuracy but 200% More Confidence"
o3 Mini: Algorithm Overlords: AI Dominates Competitive Bubble Wrap Popping, Leaving Humans Feeling Deflated.
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. o3 Mini costs 17x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $15/M tokens | $1.1/M tokens |
| Output price | $75/M tokens | $4.4/M tokens |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 64K tokens |
| Parameters | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Weights | — | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | May 2025 | Dec 2024 |
| At 10M a month | $150 | $11.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.
Claude Opus 4 is developed by Anthropic while o3 Mini is developed by OpenAI. Claude Opus 4 has a 200K token context window vs o3 Mini's 64K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4 and o3 Mini each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens and o3 Mini costs $1.1/M input tokens. o3 Mini is $13.90/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 4 and o3 Mini across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.