Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Claude Opus 4vsQwen3 Coder Next
Updated Feb 2026

Claude Opus 4vsQwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper than Claude Opus 4 at $0.2/M vs $15/M input tokens.

Claude Opus 4 and Qwen3 Coder Next compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecClaude Opus 4Qwen3 Coder Next
Input price$15/M tokens$0.2/M tokens
Output price$75/M tokens$1.5/M tokens
Context window200K tokens262K tokens
ParametersNot disclosed80B (3B active)
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMay 2025Feb 2026
SWE-bench Verified72.5%70.6%
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4
Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder NextRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4 has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing.

Qwen3 Coder Next costs 50x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4
Input
$15.00
Output
$75.00
Qwen3 Coder Next
Input
$0.20
75× cheaper
Output
$1.50
50× cheaper

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper on both: 75× input, 50× output.

Where to run it

5 hosts, cheapest first

Claude Opus 41 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Google Vertex AI$15.00 in·$75.00 out·200k·100% up
Qwen3 Coder Next4 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
PParasailbf16$0.12 in·$0.80 out·262k·100% upSStreamLake$0.18 in·$0.90 out·256k·99.2% upNNovitafp8$0.20 in·$1.50 out·262k·99.6% upAlibaba Cloud$0.30 in·$1.50 out·262k·98.5% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
56%

Claude Opus 4 uses 3.7x more transitions

Claude Opus 4
Qwen3 Coder Next
65%Vocabulary58%
57wSentence Length19w
0.67Hedging0.27
3.8Bold6.4
6.8Lists4.4
1.18Emoji0.84
1.42Headings0.98
0.22Transitions0.06
Based on 27 + 23 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen3 Coder Next logoOx Alpha logo
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Coder Next logoMiniMax M3 logo
Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 Coder Next logoGPT-5 logo
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-5New provider
Qwen3 Coder Next logoMiniMax M1 logo
Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiniMax M1New provider
Qwen3 Coder Next logoPolaris Alpha logo
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Polaris AlphaNew provider
Claude Opus 4 logoPony Alpha logo
Claude Opus 4 vs Pony AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Coder Next logoQuasar Alpha logo
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Quasar AlphaNew provider
Claude Opus 4 logoQwen Plus 0728 logo
Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen Plus 0728Cross-provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed