What is the difference between Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GLM 4.7 Flash?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is developed by Anthropic while GLM 4.7 Flash is developed by Zhipu AI. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 1.0M token context window vs GLM 4.7 Flash's 200K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GLM 4.7 Flash?

It depends on your use case. Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GLM 4.7 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Claude Sonnet 4.6 cost compared to GLM 4.7 Flash?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3/M input tokens and GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.07/M input tokens. GLM 4.7 Flash is $2.93/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GLM 4.7 Flash on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GLM 4.7 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GLM 4.7 Flash?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is developed by Anthropic while GLM 4.7 Flash is developed by Zhipu AI. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 1.0M token context window vs GLM 4.7 Flash's 200K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GLM 4.7 Flash?

It depends on your use case. Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GLM 4.7 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Claude Sonnet 4.6 cost compared to GLM 4.7 Flash?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3/M input tokens and GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.07/M input tokens. GLM 4.7 Flash is $2.93/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GLM 4.7 Flash on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GLM 4.7 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Feb 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.6vsGLM 4.7 Flash

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 at $0.07/M vs $3/M input tokens.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GLM 4.7 Flash compared across 53 shared prompts
Spec	Claude Sonnet 4.6	GLM 4.7 Flash
Input price	$3/M tokens	$0.07/M tokens
Output price	$15/M tokens	$0.4/M tokens
Context window	1.0M tokens	200K tokens
Released	Feb 2026	Jan 2026
SWE-bench Verified	79.0%	59.2%

Our Verdict

Claude Sonnet 4.6

GLM 4.7 FlashRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

GLM 4.7 Flash costs 38x less per token.

Too close to call

What do Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GLM 4.7 Flash say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Input

$3.00

Output

$15.00

GLM 4.7 Flash

Input

$0.07

43× cheaper

Output

$0.40

38× cheaper

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper on both — 43× input, 38× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

54%

Claude Sonnet 4.6 uses 19.1x more emoji

Claude Sonnet 4.6

GLM 4.7 Flash

56%Vocabulary52%

36wSentence Length15w

0.53Hedging0.33

5.1Bold5.8

3.4Lists4.7

0.19Emoji0.00

2.10Headings0.68

0.02Transitions0.13

Based on 23 + 19 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.7 Flash vs MiniMax M3New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Ox AlphaNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4Cross-provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs MiniMax M2.7New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude 3 HaikuCross-provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude 3 OpusCross-provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude 3 SonnetCross-provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)Cross-provider

Updated Feb 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.6vsGLM 4.7 Flash

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 at $0.07/M vs $3/M input tokens.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GLM 4.7 Flash compared across 53 shared prompts
Spec	Claude Sonnet 4.6	GLM 4.7 Flash
Input price	$3/M tokens	$0.07/M tokens
Output price	$15/M tokens	$0.4/M tokens
Context window	1.0M tokens	200K tokens
Released	Feb 2026	Jan 2026
SWE-bench Verified	79.0%	59.2%

Our Verdict

Claude Sonnet 4.6

GLM 4.7 FlashRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

GLM 4.7 Flash costs 38x less per token.

Too close to call

What do Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GLM 4.7 Flash say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Input

$3.00

Output

$15.00

GLM 4.7 Flash

Input

$0.07

43× cheaper

Output

$0.40

38× cheaper

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper on both — 43× input, 38× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

54%

Claude Sonnet 4.6 uses 19.1x more emoji

Claude Sonnet 4.6

GLM 4.7 Flash

56%Vocabulary52%

36wSentence Length15w

0.53Hedging0.33

5.1Bold5.8

3.4Lists4.7

0.19Emoji0.00

2.10Headings0.68

0.02Transitions0.13

Based on 23 + 19 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.7 Flash vs MiniMax M3New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Ox AlphaNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4Cross-provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs MiniMax M2.7New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude 3 HaikuCross-provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude 3 OpusCross-provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude 3 SonnetCross-provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)Cross-provider