Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 by Anthropic against Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B by Qwen, in 2 community votes, claude sonnet 4.6 and qwen: qwen3.5 397b a17b are closely matched, context windows of 1.0M vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Web Design: Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B are tied
Our Verdict
Claude Sonnet 4.6Winner
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17BRunner-up
Votes are tied. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 1.0M context window vs 262K — handles longer documents.
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is 4.2x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input
$3.00
Output
$15.00
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Input
$0.60
5.0× cheaper
Output
$3.60
4.2× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is cheaper on both — 5.0× input, 4.2× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
41%
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 8.7x more transitions
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
56%Vocabulary54%
36wSentence Length14w
0.53Hedging0.39
5.1Bold6.9
3.4Lists4.2
0.19Emoji0.23
2.10Headings0.93
0.02Transitions0.17
Based on 23 + 23 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
