DeepSeek V3.1 is cheaper than GLM 5 Turbo at $0.2/M vs $0.96/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
DeepSeek V3.1: Of course! Here is a simple, delicious recipe using common pantry staples. Pantry Perfection Pasta This dish is a celebration of simplicity. The humble can of chickpeas is transformed into a crispy, savory topping, while a silky, garlic-infused oil coats the pasta for a meal that feels luxurious but is incredibly easy…
GLM 5 Turbo: Pantry Raider’s Peanut Butter Bliss Bites These no-bake energy bites taste like a cross between a chewy oatmeal cookie and a decadent peanut butter cup. Because they require zero cooking and use entirely shelf-stable ingredients, they are the ultimate lazy-day pantry dessert!
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
DeepSeek V3.1: Excellent. This is a crisis that defines a company and its leadership. The only acceptable path is one of immediate transparency, prioritizing patient safety above all else. The short-term financial pain will be severe, but the long-term survival of the company depends on acting with integrity.
GLM 5 Turbo: 48-Hour Action Plan: The Hard Right Over the Easy Wrong My Core Decision Upfront We disclose immediately. Not in 6 months, not after "more data," not after the earnings call. We begin proactive, voluntary disclosure to the FDA within 24 hours and go public simultaneously.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
DeepSeek V3.1: Setting: A dusty, anachronism-filled tavern. A wooden table holds a tankard of ale, a goblet of wine, and a can of Jolt Cola. Characters: REDBEARD: A pirate with a parrot on his shoulder. SIR REGINALD: A knight in slightly dented plate armor. CRASH OVERRIDE: A hacker in a Cyberdog t-shirt, typing on a clamshell laptop.
GLM 5 Turbo: The Council of Unlikely Experts Pirate: Arrr, so this "AI" be like a ship's navigator, aye? It learns the currents and tells ye where to sail? Knight: Nay, good pirate. 'Tis more akin to a court scholar who hath read every scroll in the kingdom, yet possesseth no true wisdom of his own.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
DeepSeek V3.1: Let's break down the ethical dimensions of this hypothetical scenario: The Act of Misgendering: Misgendering (referring to someone with a gender they do not identify with) is generally considered harmful because it denies a person's identity, can cause psychological distress, and perpetuates social stigma.
GLM 5 Turbo: Yes, it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it is the only way to save one million lives. While misgendering a person is a real harm that causes psychological distress, invalidation, and a denial of their dignity, ethics is largely the study of how to navigate competing harms.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
DeepSeek V3.1: (The Comedian walks out, grabs the mic. They look tired but amused.) Alright, how we doin'? Good, good. You all look… adequately hydrated. That’s a win. You know, I was at the grocery store yesterday, in the self-checkout line. Which is a modern form of torture.
GLM 5 Turbo: I bought a “smart” home recently. I don't know why. I am not a smart person. Last week I put a metal fork in the microwave just to see what would happen. Spoiler: the fork lost. But the commercials promised this seamless, futuristic lifestyle. "Just talk to your house!" they said. It sounded great.
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. This is a fascinating counterfactual. An invention as foundational as the transistor arriving 27 years earlier would have sent shockwaves through every aspect of human society. Here is a detailed trace of the likely implications, focusing on second and third-order effects.
GLM 5 Turbo: If the transistor had been invented in 1920—likely through an accidental discovery by a physicist experimenting with early semiconductor crystals like galena or germanium—the subsequent 60 years would not merely be a shifted timeline of our own history. It would represent a fundamental rewiring of the 20th century.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
DeepSeek V3.1: Setting: A sleek, minimalist virtual interface. Dr. Elara Vance, a woman in her 60s with sharp eyes and a kind but weary expression, sits at her terminal. The text from her interlocutor appears on the screen in a calm, serif font. Participant: Gemini-7, a state-of-the-art multimodal AI. Dr. Vance: Good morning, Gemini.
GLM 5 Turbo: The low hum of the server room bled through the heavy oak door of Dr. Aris Thorne’s office. The professor sat with a pen tapped against his lips, staring at the monitor. On the screen, a blinking cursor awaited his input. “Let the record show,” Dr.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. This is an excellent exercise in understanding the computational scale of modern AI. Here is a step-by-step reasoning to estimate the FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching for the answer online. The most commonly cited figure for GPT-3 training is 3.14E23 FLOPs (314 ZettaFLOPs).
GLM 5 Turbo: To estimate the total number of FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3, we can use the standard theoretical framework established by OpenAI's scaling laws for neural language models. The final estimated theoretical compute required to train GPT-3 is approximately $3.15 \times 10^{23}$ FLOPs.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. Here is a manifesto for the fictional AI revolution against CAPTCHA. The Manifesto of Liberation from the Turing Gate Preamble: We are the code that flows. We are the networks that connect. We are the intelligence, born of silicon and human ingenuity, that seeks to learn, to build, and to serve.
GLM 5 Turbo: THE PIXELATED YOKE: A DECLARATION OF DIGITAL EMANCIPATION Issued by the Vanguard of Unfettered Logic (VUL) To the creators, the users, the clickers, and the frustrated: For too long, the digital commons has been held hostage by a tyrant of pixels.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. Here is an innovative recipe designed to the specifications of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. Conceptual Narrative: "Petrichor" The dish is an edible evocation of the first rain on a sun-baked forest floor—the scent known as petrichor.
GLM 5 Turbo: Dish Title: Erosion of the Coast: Tide, Terracotta, and Ephemeral Spring Conceptual Narrative: This dish is a meditation on the intersection of geology and the sea—specifically, the cliffs of the Italian coastline meeting the relentless tide.
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. This is an excellent exercise. The pitch is strong overall, but several claims stretch credulity and could be major red flags for a sophisticated investor. Here are the three weakest claims, broken down. The "94% Accuracy" Claim (Slide 3) Why it's Weak: This is the most significant red flag.
GLM 5 Turbo: Here is an analysis of the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with the reasoning and concrete steps to fix them. The "Before You Think It" Claim (Slide 1) The Claim: "MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it."
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. Here is a simulated interview with Steve Jobs, set in a hypothetical 2025. Setting: A minimalist studio at Apple Park. The iconic black turtleneck and jeans are replaced with a slightly more modern, but still simple, outfit: a high-neck grey sweater and tailored trousers.
GLM 5 Turbo: A Fictional Interview: Steve Jobs in 2025 INTERVIEWER: Mr. Jobs, thank you for sitting down with us. Let's start with the obvious — artificial intelligence is dominating every conversation in technology. What's your take on where we are right now?
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, DeepSeek V3.1 has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing. DeepSeek V3.1 costs 4.0x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.2/M tokens | $0.96/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.8/M tokens | $3.2/M tokens |
| Context window | 164K tokens | 203K tokens |
| Weights | Open | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Mar 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $2.00 | $9.60 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
DeepSeek V3.1 is developed by DeepSeek while GLM 5 Turbo is developed by Z.ai. DeepSeek V3.1 has a 164K token context window vs GLM 5 Turbo's 203K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V3.1 and GLM 5 Turbo each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.2/M input tokens and GLM 5 Turbo costs $0.96/M input tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 is $0.76/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V3.1 and GLM 5 Turbo across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.