DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Compare DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek against Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B by Google AI, context windows of 164K vs 262K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B?

DeepSeek R1 0528 and Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B are both competitive models. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens vs $0.13/M for Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B. Context windows: 164K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between DeepSeek R1 0528 and Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

DeepSeek R1 0528 is made by deepseek while Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is from google. DeepSeek R1 0528 has a 164K token context window compared to Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B's 262K. On pricing, DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens vs $0.13/M for Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B.

Our Verdict
DeepSeek R1 0528
DeepSeek R1 0528
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
80%

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B uses 15.5x more transitions

DeepSeek R1 0528
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
64%Vocabulary58%
10wSentence Length18w
0.30Hedging0.31
6.8Bold6.8
4.9Lists3.3
0.00Emoji0.00
0.40Headings0.74
0.00Transitions0.15
Based on 4 + 27 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

DeepSeek R1 0528Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
FAQ