DeepSeek R1 0528
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Grok Code Fast 1
Compare DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek against Grok Code Fast 1 by xAI, in 3 community votes, deepseek r1 0528 wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 164K vs 256K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Grok Code Fast 1?
DeepSeek R1 0528 is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 3 blind community votes on Rival. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens vs $0.2/M for Grok Code Fast 1. Context windows: 164K vs 256K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between DeepSeek R1 0528 and Grok Code Fast 1
DeepSeek R1 0528 is made by deepseek while Grok Code Fast 1 is from xai. DeepSeek R1 0528 has a 164K token context window compared to Grok Code Fast 1's 256K. On pricing, DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens vs $0.2/M for Grok Code Fast 1. In community voting, In 3 community votes, DeepSeek R1 0528 wins 100% of head-to-head duels.
In 3 community votes, DeepSeek R1 0528 wins 100% of head-to-head duels. DeepSeek R1 0528 leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 3+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Image Generation: DeepSeek R1 0528 wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
DeepSeek R1 0528Winner
Grok Code Fast 1Runner-up
Pick DeepSeek R1 0528. In 3 blind votes, DeepSeek R1 0528 wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
DeepSeek R1 0528 particularly excels in Image Generation.
Clear winner
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
98%
Grok Code Fast 1 uses 6.0x more emoji
DeepSeek R1 0528
Grok Code Fast 1
64%Vocabulary60%
10wSentence Length17w
0.30Hedging0.97
6.8Bold2.8
4.9Lists2.5
0.00Emoji0.06
0.40Headings0.89
0.00Transitions0.11
Based on 4 + 23 text responses
vs
Ask them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ