DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Compare DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 by DeepSeek against ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B by Baidu, context windows of 1.0M vs 123K, tested across 42 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 3.9x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Input
$0.14
2.0× cheaper
Output
$0.28
3.9× cheaper
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Input
$0.28
Output
$1.10
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper on both — 2.0× input, 3.9× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
32%
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B uses 93.8x more emoji
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
52%Vocabulary56%
18wSentence Length18w
0.38Hedging0.63
5.7Bold5.3
3.4Lists4.3
0.00Emoji0.94
0.83Headings0.67
0.04Transitions0.15
Based on 23 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
