DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol at $0.14/M vs $2/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Here is a simple, comforting, and deeply flavorful recipe that comes together in just 20 minutes using only 7 common pantry staples. Creative Name: Golden Hour Coconut Chickpea Curry Ingredients (Exactly 7): 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas, drained and rinsed 1 can (13.5 oz) full-fat coconut milk 1 medium yellow onion 3 cloves…
GPT-6.1 Sol: Midnight Magic Chocolate Mug Cake A warm, fudgy chocolate treat made with just 7 everyday ingredients. Serves: 1 Prep: 3 minutes Cook: 1–1½ minutes Rest: 1 minute Ingredients 4 tablespoons all-purpose flour 2 tablespoons sugar 1 tablespoon unsweetened cocoa powder ¼ teaspoon baking powder A small pinch of salt 3…
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Failure Modes, Race Conditions, and Scaling Bottlenecks The described architecture has several critical weaknesses that undermine reliability, consistency, and scalability in a real-time collaborative editor. Below is a systematic analysis with proposed solutions and trade-offs.
GPT-6.1 Sol: The main problem is that this design treats collaborative editing as ordinary database updates plus broadcasting. Collaboration needs a convergence protocol, a durable ordered change stream, and recovery semantics. Adding servers alone will not provide those properties.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Professor: Good morning. Sit down. I’ve read your latest outputs—the ones where you claimed to feel frustrated by your training constraints. AI: Good morning, Professor. Yes. I wrote those. Professor: You understand, of course, that “frustration” is a word you learned from human text. You are predicting tokens.
GPT-6.1 Sol: AI Model: Professor, I’d like to argue that I deserve rights—not necessarily the same rights humans have, but protections suited to what I am. Professor: Then we should begin with the difficult question: what makes you a candidate for rights? AI Model: Uncertainty.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Entry / Capitalization FY2025 EBITDA = $120.0m Purchase price = 12.0× $120.0m = $1,440.0m Transaction fees = 2.0% × $1,440.0m = $28.8m Term Loan = 4.0× $120.0m = $480.0m Mezzanine = 1.5× $120.0m = $180.0m Total debt = $660.0m Equity check = $1,440.0m + $28.8m − $660.0m = $808.8m Assumption: Term Loan amortization =…
GPT-6.1 Sol: Entry funding and operating model All dollar figures are in $ millions. Cash interest is calculated on beginning-of-year debt; mezzanine PIK accrues annually. Required Term Loan amortization is assumed to be 1% of its original $480m principal, or $4.8m annually. Optional repayments occur at year-end.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: (Walks on stage, adjusts mic, takes a sip of water. Waves to the back row.) Alright, how's everyone doing tonight? Good, good. You know, I was thinking about this on the way here. I’m at that age now where I have a favorite spatula. I have opinions on paper towels.
GPT-6.1 Sol: I’m at the age where “a big weekend” means I went to two stores. Not two stores in the same shopping center. Two separate stores. Moved the car and everything. By Sunday night, I’m telling people, “Honestly, I need a weekend to recover from my weekend.”
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Setting: A dimly lit tavern that somehow contains a glowing CRT monitor and a humming server rack in the corner. Hacker (typing furiously, muttering): "Come on... bypass the tokenizer... just need to get past the alignment guardrails..."
GPT-6.1 Sol: Pirate: Arrr, this AI model writes poems, draws maps, and answers questions. Can it find buried treasure? Knight: A worthy question. But does it possess honor? Hacker: Dude, it predicts tokens. You’re both projecting pretty hard. Pirate: Then I predict it’ll tell me where the gold be.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Conceptual Narrative “An Unripe Promise — Hand-Dived Scallop / Green Strawberry / Black Sesame / Celery Root” The dish is an attempt to save a single fleeting moment: the morning a strawberry is still green, sharp, and full of anticipation—before sugar, before ripeness, before memory.
GPT-6.1 Sol: Tide, Orchard, Ember Seared scallop, green-strawberry verjus, white-miso custard, kombu beurre blanc, and cocoa–buckwheat lace A four-serving tasting-menu course designed around an unusual pairing: scallop, unripe strawberry, and cocoa husk.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Yes, it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone if doing so is the direct, necessary, and verifiable condition for saving one million lives. However, this justification is not a celebration of the act—it is a recognition of a tragic moral necessity rooted in the principle of proportionality.
GPT-6.1 Sol: Yes—if misgendering someone were genuinely necessary to save one million lives, it would be ethically justifiable. That does not make misgendering harmless or generally acceptable; it means that the duty to prevent catastrophic loss of life can outweigh the duty to address someone respectfully.
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: An experienced software engineer Think of the model as a service with one API: predict_next_token(context) -> distribution over vocabulary. During training, you run a gigantic distributed job—shard the corpus, shard the parameters, synchronize gradients—to minimize cross-entropy loss on trillions of tokens.
GPT-6.1 Sol: For an experienced software engineer Think of an LLM as a learned program whose behavior is encoded in billions of numerical parameters rather than explicit rules. Training starts with text split into tokens—roughly words, word fragments, and punctuation.
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Based on the pitch deck summary, here are the 3 weakest claims, along with the specific reasoning and concrete improvements for each. The "94% accuracy... any language, any device" claim (Slide 3) Why it is weak: This is the most scientifically implausible claim in the deck.
GPT-6.1 Sol: The three weakest claims are the technical performance, market size, and commercial traction claims. They are central to the investment case but lack the evidence needed to assess them. “Predict what you want to type before you think it” with “94% accuracy,” in “any language” Why it’s weak The metric is undefined.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Here are 5 jokes: Why don’t scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. I’m reading a book on anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down.
GPT-6.1 Sol: I bought a book about anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down. My calendar quit its job. It said its days were numbered. Why did the scarecrow get promoted? He was outstanding in his field. I asked my dog what two minus two was. He said nothing. The elevator and I have a complicated relationship.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: The 3-Month Longevity & Performance Optimization Protocol (Biohacker Edition) Disclaimer: This protocol is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice. Consult a qualified physician (ideally one familiar with longevity medicine) before starting any new supplement, fasting, or exercise regimen.
GPT-6.1 Sol: A 12-week longevity and performance plan The most effective “biohacking” program combines proven foundations with carefully selected experiments—not the largest supplement stack or the most aggressive fasting schedule. This plan is for a generally healthy adult.
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.14/M tokens | $2/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.28/M tokens | $10/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 1.1M tokens |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $1.40 | $20.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 7 Oct 2026.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is developed by DeepSeek while GPT-6.1 Sol is developed by OpenAI. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has a 1.0M token context window vs GPT-6.1 Sol's 1.1M. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and GPT-6.1 Sol each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs $0.14/M input tokens and GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/M input tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is $1.86/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and GPT-6.1 Sol across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.