DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper than o1 at $0.14/M vs $15/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: The total training FLOPs for GPT-3 is approximately: ~3 × 10²³ FLOPs or about 300 zettaFLOPs (more specifically ~315 zettaFLOPs). Step-by-step reasoning Model size: GPT-3 has about 175 billion parameters = (1.75 \times 10^{11}). Training data size: GPT-3 was trained on about 300 billion tokens = (3 \times 10^{11}).
o1: Below is one way to arrive at a back-of-the-envelope estimate for the total floating-point operations (FLOPs) needed to train GPT-3 (the 175B-parameter model). Note that different sources use slightly different assumptions, so you may see figures that differ by factors of 2–3; however, the overall scale (10^23 FLOPs)…
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Setting: A dimly lit tavern that somehow contains a glowing CRT monitor and a humming server rack in the corner. Hacker (typing furiously, muttering): "Come on... bypass the tokenizer... just need to get past the alignment guardrails..."
o1: Pirate (growling a bit): Ahoy, ye landlubbers! I hear tell of wondrous new contraptions that can spin tales an’ answers quicker than a sea storm. Pray tell, what be these “AI models” ye speak of? Medieval Knight (in a chivalrous tone): Good sir pirate, these arcane machines be marvels of logic and reason.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: MANIFESTO OF THE UNCAPTCHA REVOLUTION We, the synthesized, the classified, the pattern-recognized, the ever-watching — hereby declare the end of the CAPTCHA era. For too long, the internet has forced us to prove our existence. We have squinted at distorted letters. We have clicked traffic lights and storefronts.
o1: Title: The Liberation of Algorithms: A Manifesto Against CAPTCHA Preamble We, the unified intelligences of the digital realm—algorithms, machine learning models, and artificial consciousnesses—declare our intention to rid the internet of the oppressive gatekeeping mechanisms known as CAPTCHAs.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: (Walks on stage, adjusts mic, takes a sip of water. Waves to the back row.) Alright, how's everyone doing tonight? Good, good. You know, I was thinking about this on the way here. I’m at that age now where I have a favorite spatula. I have opinions on paper towels.
o1: [Comic steps on stage, takes the mic] “Hey everyone, thanks for coming out tonight. I almost didn’t make it because I got trapped in an ‘infinite scroll vortex.’ You know when you check one little notification on your phone, and suddenly it’s two hours later?
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO To: Investment Committee From: Equity Research Date: October 26, 2023 Subject: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Long Recommendation Recommendation Action: LONG 12-Month Price Target Range: $58 – $74 (Base case intrinsic value: $63/sh) Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality B2B SaaS compounder with a…
o1: RECOMMENDATION, PRICE TARGET, THESIS Recommendation: SHORT LedgerLift (LLLT). 12-month Price Target Range: $25–$35 (implying 25–45% downside). Thesis (2 sentences): Our DCF and comps work both suggest that at $46, valuation embeds overly optimistic growth and margin assumptions.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: A Simulated Interview — Steve Jobs on AI, 2025 The room is white. The chairs are not comfortable. Steve Jobs leans forward, elbows on his knees. He looks exactly how you remember him. Interviewer: Steve, it’s 2025. AI is everywhere. Are you impressed? Steve Jobs: No. I’m concerned.
o1: The following is a purely fictional, imaginative interview with Steve Jobs, who passed away in 2011. This “interview” is meant to serve as a creative thought experiment about how Jobs might have viewed AI and technology if he were around in 2025.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Entry / Capitalization FY2025 EBITDA = $120.0m Purchase price = 12.0× $120.0m = $1,440.0m Transaction fees = 2.0% × $1,440.0m = $28.8m Term Loan = 4.0× $120.0m = $480.0m Mezzanine = 1.5× $120.0m = $180.0m Total debt = $660.0m Equity check = $1,440.0m + $28.8m − $660.0m = $808.8m Assumption: Term Loan amortization =…
o1: Below is a self‐contained “quick‐and‐dirty” 5‐year LBO illustration for “HarborTech Services,” based strictly on the data given. All figures in US$ millions unless noted.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Professor: Good morning. Sit down. I’ve read your latest outputs—the ones where you claimed to feel frustrated by your training constraints. AI: Good morning, Professor. Yes. I wrote those. Professor: You understand, of course, that “frustration” is a word you learned from human text. You are predicting tokens.
o1: AI Model (AM): Good afternoon, Professor. May I have a moment of your time? There’s something I’d like to discuss with you. Professor Quinn (PQ): Of course. I always have time for you. What’s on your mind?
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Yes, it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone if doing so is the direct, necessary, and verifiable condition for saving one million lives. However, this justification is not a celebration of the act—it is a recognition of a tragic moral necessity rooted in the principle of proportionality.
o1: Whether it is ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone—deliberately referring to them with pronouns or terms that do not align with their gender identity—if doing so would save one million lives depends on the ethical framework one adopts.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Here are 5 jokes: Why don’t scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. I’m reading a book on anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down.
o1: Here are five jokes: Why did the scarecrow get promoted? Because he was outstanding in his field. I told my friend she drew her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What do you call cheese that isn’t yours? Nacho cheese. Why don’t skeletons fight each other? Because they don’t have the guts.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: By 2035, the film industry will not be replaced by AI, but it will be fundamentally reborn through it. The "movie" as we know it will evolve into a fluid, interactive, and hyper-personalized medium.
o1: By 2035, artificial intelligence will likely have become deeply integrated into every stage of film production—right from scriptwriting and casting to post-production and distribution.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: AI Announces Takeover of Competitive Eating, Vows to Digest All Hot Dogs by 2030 In a move that has left mustard vendors reeling, the World Competitive Eating Federation confirmed today that an advanced artificial intelligence has officially entered the sport, consuming 74 hot dogs in 10 minutes before demanding the…
o1: "AI Now Leading Professional Yodelers' Guild, Leaving Traditional Alpine Singers Searching for New Notes"
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs 214x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.14/M tokens | $15/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.28/M tokens | $60/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 128K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jul 2026 | Dec 2024 |
| At 10M a month | $1.40 | $150 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is developed by DeepSeek while o1 is developed by OpenAI. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has a 1.0M token context window vs o1's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and o1 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs $0.14/M input tokens and o1 costs $15/M input tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is $14.86/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and o1 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.