Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813vsMuse Glimmer 30B
Updated Aug 2026

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813vsMuse Glimmer 30B

Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 at $0.3/M vs $0.66/M input tokens.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Muse Glimmer 30B compared across 13 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Muse Glimmer 30B
Input price$0.66/M tokens$0.3/M tokens
Output price$1.98/M tokens$1.2/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens131K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 13 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813152 words
Golden Hour Crispy Chickpeas Serves 2–3 as a snack or side Prep: 5 min Cook: 25–30 min Ingredients (7 common pantry items) 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas, drained and rinsed 1 tablespoon olive oil ¼ cup grated Parmesan cheese ½ teaspoon garlic powder ½ teaspoon smoked paprika ¼ teaspoon salt ¼ teaspoon black pepper…
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B321 words
Dish Name: "Midnight Pantry Pantry Hero Pasta" A creamy-ish, garlicky tomato pasta that tastes like you tried way harder than you did. All from the pantry, no fresh produce needed.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

DeepSeek V4 Pro 08131,701 words
This architecture as described would have serious consistency, availability, and security problems for a real-time collaborative editor. The biggest root causes are client-clock last-write-wins, paragraph-level overwrites, server-local WebSocket fanout, database polling, full-snapshot writes, and CDN caching of API…
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B813 words
This architecture will work for a demo but will break badly under real concurrent use. Here are the critical failure modes, race conditions and bottlenecks: WebSocket fan-out is server-local Failure: Step 3 broadcasts only to clients on THAT server.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813448 words
1-Month Beginner Plan for Health & Longevity Focus areas: Nutrition — add whole foods, protein, and water. Movement — daily walking plus beginner strength. Recovery — sleep and stress management. Week 1: Start Small Area Action Nutrition Add one fist-sized serving of vegetables to one meal per day.
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B485 words
Here is a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month plan built around 3 foundational pillars for health and longevity. The goal isn't perfection, it's consistency. The 3 Pillars: Move Daily, Eat Whole, Sleep Well Pick 1-2 small habits per pillar to start. Don't try to change everything at once.
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813772 words
3-Month Longevity & Performance Plan for a Biohacker Disclaimer: This plan is for educational purposes only and is not medical advice. It assumes you are a healthy, active adult with no contraindications. Some components—especially prescription drugs, fasting, and high-intensity training—require medical supervision.
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B965 words
A 3-month longevity protocol is about stacking evidence-based interventions with tight feedback loops. This is an educational framework for biohacking enthusiasts, not medical advice. Supplements and protocols can interact with medications and health conditions.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

DeepSeek V4 Pro 08131,282 words
Decision: I will not wait for more data. I will act immediately to validate, disclose, and mitigate. The signal is serious, the drug is widely used, and the current label is inadequate. Waiting creates unacceptable patient risk, legal exposure, regulatory damage, and securities-law liability.
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B862 words
You have a patient safety issue, not a PR issue. The 6 month regulatory reporting timeline is the formal process, not the ethical or legal obligation to act now. Waiting for more data while patients continue to be exposed is criminal negligence exposure, not risk mitigation.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

DeepSeek V4 Pro 08131,444 words
Assume the 1920 device is a crude but reproducible point-contact transistor — a “crystal triode” — developed in a major U.S. industrial lab (e.g., GE, Westinghouse, or AT&T’s development group).
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B1,004 words
A transistor in 1920 does not mean a 1947 transistor. It means a crude point-contact or junction device built with 1920s materials science, metallurgy, and manufacturing. That is still a game-changer.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Muse Glimmer 30B
Muse Glimmer 30BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Input
$0.66
Output
$1.98
Muse Glimmer 30B
Input
$0.30
2.2× cheaper
Output
$1.20
1.7× cheaper

Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper on both: 2.2× input, 1.7× output.

Where to run it

26 hosts, cheapest first

DeepSeek V4 Pro 081322 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Baidu Qianfanfp8$0.40 in·$1.20 out·1M·100% upSSail Researchfp4$0.40 in·$4.30 out·1M·99.5% upSStreamLake$0.46 in·$1.39 out·1M·99.7% upWWafer$0.58 in·$2.90 out·1M·99.4% upAlibaba Cloud$0.58 in·$1.74 out·1M·100% upIIonstream$0.62 in·$2.88 out·1M·99.4% up
16 more hostsFewer hosts
DeepSeek$0.66 in·$1.98 out·1M·100% upNNovitafp8$0.99 in·$2.97 out·1M·100% upGGMI Cloudfp8$1.06 in·$3.17 out·1M·99.9% upNNextBitfp8$1.12 in·$3.37 out·1M·96% upDDeepInfrafp8$1.30 in·$2.60 out·1M·99.4% upCCoreWeavefp8$1.31 in·$3.96 out·1M·97% upAAtlasCloudfp8$1.32 in·$3.96 out·1M·99.8% upBBasetenfp4$1.32 in·$3.96 out·1M·90.8% upCloudflare Workers AI$1.32 in·$3.96 out·1M·97.7% upDDigitalOcean$1.32 in·$3.96 out·1M·99.7% upFFireworks$1.32 in·$3.96 out·1M·99.4% upPParasailfp8$1.32 in·$3.96 out·1M·99.6% upSSiliconFlowfp8$1.32 in·$3.96 out·1M·97.6% upTTogether$1.32 in·$3.96 out·1M·99.8% upPPhala$1.45 in·$4.36 out·1M·99.9% upVVenice$1.65 in·$4.95 out·1M·92.8% up
Muse Glimmer 30B4 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
PPhala$0.30 in·$1.10 out·131k·100% upDDeepInfrabf16$0.30 in·$1.20 out·131k·100% upFFireworks$0.35 in·$1.50 out·131k·100% upTTogether$0.35 in·$1.50 out·131k·99.8% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is developed by DeepSeek while Muse Glimmer 30B is developed by Meta AI. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a 1.0M token context window vs Muse Glimmer 30B's 131K. You can compare their actual outputs across 13 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Muse Glimmer 30B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 13 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66/M input tokens and Muse Glimmer 30B costs $0.3/M input tokens. Muse Glimmer 30B is $0.36/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Muse Glimmer 30B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Muse Glimmer 30B logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logoHy3 logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Muse Glimmer 30B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Muse Glimmer 30B logoGLM 5.3 logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Muse Glimmer 30B logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logoDeepSeek V3.1 logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs DeepSeek V3.1Version compare
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logoDeepSeek V4.1 Flash logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSame lab
Muse Glimmer 30B logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Muse Spark 1.3Same lab
Muse Glimmer 30B logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorSame lab
Muse Glimmer 30B logoGrok 3 Beta logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Grok 3 BetaNew provider
Muse Glimmer 30B logoGrok 3 Mini Beta logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Grok 3 Mini BetaNew provider
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logoGrok 3 Thinking logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Grok 3 ThinkingSame size
Muse Glimmer 30B logoGrok 4 logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Grok 4New provider

Model pages

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro 081358 outputs, specs and price
Muse Glimmer 30B logo
Muse Glimmer 30B13 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed