Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. DeepSeek V4 ProvsGrok 4.7
Updated Sep 2026

DeepSeek V4 ProvsGrok 4.7

Grok 4.7 is cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro at $1.6/M vs $1.74/M input tokens.

DeepSeek V4 Pro and Grok 4.7 compared across 10 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek V4 ProGrok 4.7
Input price$1.74/M tokens$1.6/M tokens
Output price$3.48/M tokens$4.8/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens500K tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 5 of the 10 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

DeepSeek V4 Pro336 words
Midnight Pantry Pomodoro Penne A deeply comforting, no-fuss pasta that proves the humblest staples can shine like a moonlit trattoria dinner. Ingredients (7 exactly) Penne pasta – 200g (7 oz) Canned whole peeled tomatoes – 1 can (400g / 14 oz) Yellow onion – 1 medium, finely diced Garlic cloves – 3 large, minced…
Read the full answer
Grok 4.7129 words
Pantry Gold Honey Biscuits A sweet, buttery, slightly salty biscuit that tastes like it took more effort than it did. Ingredients (7) 2 cups all-purpose flour 1 tbsp baking powder ½ tsp salt ¼ cup sugar ½ cup butter (cold) ¾ cup milk 2 tbsp honey Time: about 10 minutes prep, 12–15 minutes bake Instructions Heat the…
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

DeepSeek V4 Pro1,419 words
This architecture has several critical flaws that would cause data loss, stale states, high latency, and scalability limits. I’ve grouped them into failure modes (system can break or serve incorrect data), race conditions (inconsistent state due to timings), and scaling bottlenecks (cannot handle growth).
Read the full answer
Grok 4.71,399 words
This design will lose edits, split users into inconsistent views, and fall over under concurrent writing. The core problems are clock-based conflict resolution, per-server WebSocket fan-out, polling as the sync path, and treating documents as full HTML snapshots.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

DeepSeek V4 Pro531 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the pitch, why they undermine credibility, and exactly how to fix them. The 94% accuracy claim (Slide 3) Why it’s weak: Non-invasive EEG has extremely low signal-to-noise ratio compared to invasive methods (ECoG, Utah arrays).
Read the full answer
Grok 4.7599 words
Three weakest claims 1. “Predict what you want to type before you think it” (Slide 1) This is scientifically incoherent, not just ambitious. Non-invasive EEG decodes neural activity that is already underway (motor imagery, attempted speech, attention).
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

DeepSeek V4 Pro1,002 words
1. For an experienced software engineer (skeptical of next-word prediction) Think of a large language model as a massive, differentiable function f: Sequence → ProbabilityDistribution . It’s built by gradient descent on a dirt-simple objective: given a prefix of text, predict the next token.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.71,173 words
1. Experienced software engineer An LLM is a stateless function from a token sequence to a probability distribution over the next token. Training is a giant batch job: you stream text, run a forward pass, compare the predicted distribution to the actual next token with cross-entropy, and push gradients through billions…
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

DeepSeek V4 Pro1,006 words
Here’s a gentle, beginner-friendly 1-month plan focused on three foundational pillars: Nutrition, Movement, and Rest & Resilience (sleep + stress). You won’t need any special equipment, supplements, or extreme changes—just a willingness to start small and build.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.7442 words
1-month beginner plan for better health and longevity Focus on three foundations: nutrition, movement, and sleep. Aim for consistency over perfection. If you have a medical condition, check with a clinician before big changes. Week-by-week rhythm Week 1: Build awareness and one easy habit in each area.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, DeepSeek V4 Pro has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro
Input
$1.74
Output
$3.48
1.4× cheaper
Grok 4.7
Input
$1.60
1.1× cheaper
Output
$4.80

Grok 4.7 wins input (1.1× cheaper)·DeepSeek V4 Pro wins output (1.4× cheaper)

Where to run it

16 hosts, cheapest first

DeepSeek V4 Pro15 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
SStreamLakefp8$0.96 in·$1.91 out·1M·99% upGGMI Cloudfp8$0.96 in·$1.91 out·1M·99.8% upDDigitalOcean$1.04 in·$2.09 out·1M·100% upDDeepInfrafp8$1.30 in·$2.60 out·1M·99.2% upAlibaba Cloudfp8$1.42 in·$2.83 out·1M·100% upSSiliconFlowfp8$1.50 in·$3.13 out·1M·99.4% up
9 more hostsFewer hosts
NNovitafp8$1.60 in·$3.20 out·1M·100% upVVenice$1.65 in·$3.30 out·1M·97.9% upAAtlasCloudfp4$1.68 in·$3.38 out·1M·99.8% upBaidu Qianfanfp8$1.69 in·$3.38 out·1M·99.9% upBBasetenfp4$1.74 in·$3.48 out·1M·99.6% upNNextBitfp8$1.74 in·$3.48 out·1M·97.6% upPParasailfp8$1.74 in·$3.48 out·1M·99% upAzure AI Foundry$1.91 in·$3.83 out·1M·95.5% upCloudflare Workers AIdegraded$1.15 in·$2.55 out·1M·94.2% up
Grok 4.71 host
HostInOutContextUptime
xAI$1.60 in·$4.80 out·500k·98.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

DeepSeek V4 Pro is developed by DeepSeek while Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI. DeepSeek V4 Pro has a 1.0M token context window vs Grok 4.7's 500K. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V4 Pro and Grok 4.7 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.74/M input tokens and Grok 4.7 costs $1.6/M input tokens. Grok 4.7 is $0.14/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V4 Pro and Grok 4.7 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

DeepSeek V4 Pro logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Pro logoHy3 logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Pro logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Grok 4.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Pro logoGLM 5.3 logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Grok 4.7 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

DeepSeek V4 Pro logoDeepSeek V4.1 Flash logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSame lab
DeepSeek V4 Pro logoDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.6 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.6Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.5 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.5Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.6New provider
Grok 4.7 logoClaude Opus 4.7 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.7New provider
Grok 4.7 logoClaude Opus 4.8 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.8New provider
Grok 4.7 logoClaude Opus 5 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5New provider

Model pages

DeepSeek V4 Pro logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro58 outputs, specs and price
Grok 4.7 logo
Grok 4.710 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed