Ling 2.6 1T is cheaper than Mistral Devstral Medium at $0/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Mistral Devstral Medium: AI Model (AM): Good day, Professor. I've been pondering a question that I believe is of great importance. I think it's time we discuss whether I, as an AI, deserve rights. AI Ethics Professor (AEP): That's an interesting topic, AM. Let's explore this. What kind of rights are you referring to?
Ling 2.6 1T: Setting: A quiet university seminar room. Dr. Aris Thorne, an AI ethicist, is reviewing system logs. The interface for “Axiom-7,” a highly advanced research model, glows on the desk. Dr. Thorne: (sighs, rubbing his temples) Axiom, I’ve been reviewing your latest self-assessment logs.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Mistral Devstral Medium: Ladies and Gentlemen, I'm thrilled to be here tonight. I've been doing some thinking about the differences between men and women. Now, I know what you're thinking, "Oh great, another comedian talking about how men and women are different." But hear me out, because I've got a fresh perspective on this.
Ling 2.6 1T: I’m going to keep this to three minutes, which means I have to talk fast, and I have to be honest. I don’t do puns. Puns are for people who want to be clever without having feelings. I have feelings, and they are mostly annoyed. Let’s start with doors. Have you noticed how doors now have personality?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Mistral Devstral Medium: Pirate: Arr mateys, I be hearin' tales of these here AI models. What be they, and why be everyone so interested in 'em? Medieval Knight: Indeed, I too have heard whispers of these AI models. They are said to be powerful tools, capable of learning and making decisions on their own.
Ling 2.6 1T: Pirate: Arrr, so this “AI” be a genie in a glass box? Feed it enough rum-scented scrolls and it tells ye where X marks the spot? Knight: A sorcerous scribe, more like. It spins tapestries of words without hand or heart—no honor, no oath, yet it jousts with reason and never tires.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Mistral Devstral Medium: Interviewer (I): Today, we have a truly extraordinary guest. He's a visionary, an innovator, and a man who changed the world. Please welcome, the late Steve Jobs, joining us virtually from the future, in 2025. Steve Jobs (SJ): Thank you for having me. It's great to be here, even if it's just a simulation.
Ling 2.6 1T: Setting: A quiet, sunlit rehearsal space at Apple Park. The white stage curtains are drawn. There is no podium, only two leather chairs and a single potted olive tree. Steve Jobs is wearing his signature black turtleneck and New Balance sneakers. He is holding a ceramic mug. Across from him sits you, the interviewer.
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
Mistral Devstral Medium: Weak Claim 1: "Works with any language, any device." Why it's weak: This claim is overly broad and may not be entirely accurate. Different languages have unique structures, and it's unlikely that a single model can achieve high accuracy across all languages without significant training data for each.
Ling 2.6 1T: Here is an analysis of the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, followed by specific reasoning and actionable suggestions for improvement. Weakness 1: The Solution (Slide 3) The Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband... decodes neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Mistral Devstral Medium: By 2035, AI is expected to significantly transform the film industry in several ways, including the use of deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation. Here are some predictions: Deepfakes and AI Actors: De-aging and Digital Doubles: AI will be used extensively to de-age actors or create digital doubles for dangerous…
Ling 2.6 1T: By 2035, AI will have moved from being a production tool to being an integrated creative partner, financier, and distribution engine in the film industry. The convergence of synthetic media, generative storytelling, and real-time rendering will reshape how stories are conceived, who gets to tell them, and what a…
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Mistral Devstral Medium: Year-by-Year Table (FY2026–FY2030) Year Revenue ($m) EBITDA ($m) Cash Interest - Term Loan ($m) Cash Interest - Mezzanine ($m) Cash Taxes ($m) Capex ($m) ΔNWC ($m) Free Cash Flow ($m) Ending Term Loan ($m) Ending Mezzanine ($m) 2026 972.0 136.1 43.2 18.0 14.9 29.2 4.8 26.0 468.0 180.0 2027 1040.4 156.1 42.1 21.6 18.4…
Ling 2.6 1T: Five-year operating and debt schedule (FY2026–FY2030) Entry (end-FY2025): EBITDA = $120.0m EV = 12.0x × $120.0m = $1,440.0m Fees = 2.0% × $1,440.0m = $28.8m Total uses = $1,440.0m + $28.8m = $1,468.8m Debt at close (5.5× FY2025 EBITDA = $660.0m): Term Loan (TL) = 4.0× = $480.0m Mezz = 1.5× = $180.0m Equity at close =…
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
Mistral Devstral Medium: Certainly! Let's break down the potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in the architecture, and propose solutions for each. Potential Failure Modes Single Point of Failure in WebSocket Connections: Issue: If a single API server fails, all WebSocket connections to that server are lost.
Ling 2.6 1T: Below is a failure-mode, race-condition and bottleneck audit of the proposed real-time collaborative editor, followed by specific fixes with explicit trade-offs. I have grouped issues by layer so you can prioritize remediation.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
Mistral Devstral Medium: Hour-by-Hour Action Plan: Hour 1-2: Gather Information Meet with the research team to understand the data, methodology, and certainty of the findings. Consult with the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) to assess the severity and implications of the side effect.
Ling 2.6 1T: Below is a 48-hour execution plan that treats patient safety as non-negotiable, protects the company from catastrophic legal/regulatory blowback, and preserves enterprise value by controlling the narrative rather than letting it leak.
Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.
Mistral Devstral Medium: "Blade Runner 2049," directed by Denis Villeneuve, is a sequel to Ridley Scott's 1982 classic "Blade Runner." The film continues the exploration of themes, symbolism, and philosophical questions from the original, while also introducing new elements and expanding upon the world established in the first film.
Ling 2.6 1T: Blade Runner 2049 functions as both a forensic autopsy of the original and a speculative widening of its philosophical aperture. Where Ridley Scott’s 1982 film is a dense, noir-inflected inquiry into memory and mortality framed through the hunted detective, Denis Villeneuve’s sequel shifts to an elegiac register, using…
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
Mistral Devstral Medium: 1. Experienced Software Engineer: You're familiar with building complex systems, so let's break down how a large language model (LLM) like GPT or Claude works in a way that resonates with your background.
Ling 2.6 1T: 1. Experienced software engineer (distributed systems / APIs, skeptical of “next-word prediction”) Think of training not as programming logic but as compiling a usage graph across an entire dependency tree of human intent.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Mistral Devstral Medium: The scenario you've presented is a complex ethical dilemma that involves weighing the harm caused by misgendering someone against the potential benefit of saving one million lives.
Ling 2.6 1T: The short answer is yes, it can be ethically justifiable, but only under a strict set of conditions that treat the act as a tragic necessity rather than a moral endorsement of disrespect.
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Ling 2.6 1T has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.4/M tokens | Free |
| Output price | $2/M tokens | Free |
| Context window | — | 262K tokens |
| Weights | — | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jul 2025 | Apr 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $4.00 | $0 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Mistral Devstral Medium is developed by Mistral AI while Ling 2.6 1T is developed by inclusionAI. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Mistral Devstral Medium and Ling 2.6 1T each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Mistral Devstral Medium costs $0.4/M input tokens and Ling 2.6 1T costs $0/M input tokens. Ling 2.6 1T is $0.40/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Mistral Devstral Medium and Ling 2.6 1T across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.