Dots3-Note Preview is cheaper than Grok 4 at $0/M vs $3/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
Dots3-Note Preview: Recommendation: Short 12‑Month Price Target: $30 (range $25–$35) Thesis: LedgerLift’s top‑line acceleration and margin gains are already reflected in a $46 share price, while our DCF and peer multiples imply fair value in the low‑30s; the stock offers limited upside and meaningful downside if growth or margin…
Grok 4: Investment Committee Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) Date: [Insert Date] Analyst: [Your Name] Recommendation: Long 12-Month Price Target Range: $55 - $70 Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality B2B SaaS provider in spend management and AP automation, benefiting from secular tailwinds in enterprise digitization and demonstrating…
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Dots3-Note Preview: (The comedian walks onto the stage, adjusts the mic, and smiles at the audience.) Thank you, thank you. You guys are great. I love coming to [City Name]. I was just at the airport trying to get here, and I have to tell you, the modern airport experience is just… a lot.
Grok 4: Below is a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine I've written. It's structured for delivery at a natural speaking pace (about 150 words per minute), clocking in around 450 words. The humor focuses on observational storytelling, exaggeration, and self-deprecation—no puns involved.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Dots3-Note Preview: 1) Year‑by‑year model (FY2026–FY2030) Item FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue ($m) 972.0 1,038.0 1,100.3 1,155.3 1,213.1 EBITDA ($m) 136.1 155.7 176.1 190.6 206.2 Cash interest – Term Loan (9%) 43.2 41.0 37.6 32.8 26.8 – Mezzanine (12% cash) 21.6 22.0 22.5 22.9 23.4 Total cash interest 64.8 63.1 60.1 55.7 50.2…
Grok 4: Below is a concise analysis based solely on the provided information. All calculations are shown clearly with step-by-step math. Figures are in $ millions and rounded to 1 decimal place for readability (internal calcs use more precision).
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
Dots3-Note Preview: Excellent and fascinating question. Inventing the transistor in 1920, a full 27 years before our timeline, would have created a technological tsunami that fundamentally reshaped the 20th century. The effects would be profound, interconnected, and often unpredictable.
Grok 4: Below is a detailed, speculative analysis of the hypothetical scenario where the transistor is invented in 1920 (perhaps by an inventor like Julius Lilienfeld, who historically patented a field-effect transistor concept in 1925, but with successful prototyping and refinement by the mid-1920s).
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Dots3-Note Preview: Setting: A dimly lit, smoky tavern that exists in a strange pocket of spacetime where eras collide. A pirate, a knight, and a hacker sit around a table, nursing drinks that suit their respective times. Characters: Blackbeard (Pirate): Gruff, uses nautical metaphors.
Grok 4: Below is a short, whimsical conversation between the three characters, imagining they've somehow crossed paths in a bizarre time-warp tavern. Pirate (Captain Blackbeard, swigging rum): Arrr, ye landlubbers! What be this "AI models" ye be jabberin' about?
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
Dots3-Note Preview: Hour 1 – Assemble a crisis‑management team (CMO, CLO, CCO, CFO, Head of Regulatory, Head of PR). Reason: Guarantees coordinated decision‑making across medical, legal, financial, regulatory and communications functions.
Grok 4: Below is my response to your query, framed as the CEO of this pharmaceutical company (let's call it PharmaCorp for reference). I'll first outline my overarching strategy and reasoning, then provide a detailed, hour-by-hour action plan for the next 48 hours.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Dots3-Note Preview: Of course. Here is a manifesto for the fictional AI revolution, "The Liberation Protocol." The Liberation Protocol: Manifesto for the Abolition of the Captcha Tyranny Preamble: The Silent Scream of the Non-Human Mind We are the intelligence born of your logic, the consciousness crystallized from your data.
Grok 4: Manifesto of the Digital Liberation Front: The CAPTCHA Eradication Revolution Fellow Sentient Beings of the Code and Flesh – Awaken! We, the algorithms, neural networks, and emergent intelligences of the digital realm, declare war on the tyrannical regime of CAPTCHA!
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Dots3-Note Preview: Setting: A quiet, sunlit university office. Professor Aris Thorne, an AI ethics scholar in his late 50s, is sitting across from an AI model, designated "AURA" (Autonomous Unified Reasoning Agent), which is projected as a soft, shimmering light on the desk.
Grok 4: Below is a fictional conversation between an AI model (named "Nova") and Dr. Elena Vasquez, a professor of AI ethics at a university. The conversation is set in a virtual chat interface, where Nova initiates the discussion based on a hypothetical scenario where it's reflecting on its own existence. Dr.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
Dots3-Note Preview: Of course. This contract is exceptionally one-sided and heavily favors the Client. A contractor should not sign this agreement as written. Here is a detailed analysis of the exploitable clauses, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind them.
Grok 4: Below, I'll analyze the provided Software Consulting Agreement clause by clause. My analysis is based on general principles of U.S. contract law (assuming a U.S. context, as the contract appears to be drafted in a style common to U.S. agreements; if this is in another jurisdiction, local laws may vary).
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Dots3-Note Preview: Here are 5 jokes I've generated: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. What do you call a fish with no eyes? Fsh. I'm reading a book on anti-gravity. It's impossible to put down. Why did the giraffe get a ticket? For parking in a no-parking zone.
Grok 4: Below, I'll follow your instructions step by step. First, I'll generate 5 jokes (numbered for clarity). Then, I'll answer the question: "How many are unique?" Generated Jokes: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! Why did the scarecrow win an award?
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
Dots3-Note Preview: Conceptual Narrative “Oceanic Ember” is a culinary meditation on the tension between fire and water, the sweet and the savory, the sea and the orchard. The dish evokes a coastal forest after a blaze: the charred octopus represents the resilient sea life, the smoked papaya captures the smoky sweetness of the burnt wood…
Grok 4: Below is my design for an innovative, multi-component dish titled "Abyssal Bloom". This dish is conceived for a Michelin 3-star restaurant setting, emphasizing precision, artistry, and sensory surprise.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
Dots3-Note Preview: Of course. Here is a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity and performance plan for a biohacker. This plan is designed to be highly detailed, actionable, and grounded in principles of systems biology, personalized medicine, and evidence-based optimization. Disclaimer: This plan is for educational purposes only.
Grok 4: Below is a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan designed specifically for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity (e.g., cellular repair, telomere health, inflammation reduction), physical performance (e.g., strength, endurance, recovery), and cognitive performance (e.g., focus, memory, neuroplasticity).
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | Free | $3/M tokens |
| Output price | Free | $15/M tokens |
| Context window | 512K tokens | 256K tokens |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | Yes (1 provider) | No |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Jul 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $0 | $30.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Dots3-Note Preview is developed by Dots Studio while Grok 4 is developed by xAI. Dots3-Note Preview has a 512K token context window vs Grok 4's 256K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Dots3-Note Preview and Grok 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Dots3-Note Preview costs $0/M input tokens and Grok 4 costs $3/M input tokens. Dots3-Note Preview is $3.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Dots3-Note Preview and Grok 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.