ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Compare ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B by Baidu against Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental by Google AI, context windows of 123K vs 1.0M, tested across 42 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Input
$0.28
3.6× cheaper
Output
$1.10
1.8× cheaper
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Input
$1.00
Output
$2.00
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper on both — 3.6× input, 1.8× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
40%
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B uses 93.8x more emoji
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
56%Vocabulary54%
18wSentence Length15w
0.63Hedging0.35
5.3Bold5.6
4.3Lists3.9
0.94Emoji0.00
0.67Headings0.39
0.15Transitions0.17
Based on 27 + 18 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
