Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is cheaper than ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B at $0.00015/M vs $0.28/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B: 5 Jokes Joke 1: The Math Book's Problem Why was the math book sad? Because it had too many problems! Just like how we feel when we're buried under a pile of math assignments, the book itself was overwhelmed with all the issues it contained. Joke 2: The Elephant in the Fridge How do you fit an elephant into a fridge?
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: Sure! Here are 5 original jokes: I asked my dog what's two minus two. He said nothing. (Paw-sitively nothing!) Why did the coffee file a police report? It got mugged. Every single morning. I used to be a baker, but I couldn't make enough dough. So I switched careers and became a plumber. Now I deal with real pipes.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B: "AI Unveils Groundbreaking Algorithm to Outperform Humans in Professional Nap-Taking: 'We’ve Achieved Peak Laziness,' Says CEO" *In a shocking move, Silicon Valley startup SnoozeTech announced today that its AI system, Zzz-9000, has officially surpassed human capabilities in the highly competitive field of "strategic…
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: "AI Revolutionizes Competitive Napping: DeepDream Wins National Snore-a-Thon with Perfect REM Algorithm" — In a stunning turn of events, an artificial intelligence named DeepDream has clinched first place at the 42nd Annual National Snore-a-Thon, outlasting 300 human competitors with its precisely calibrated breathing…
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B: Weak Claim 1: Slide 1 Vision - "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration. MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it." Why it’s weak: The claim of predicting what a user wants to type "before you think it" is scientifically implausible and borders on hyperbole.
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: This pitch deck for MindMeld AI is compelling and ambitious, but three claims raise significant red flags in terms of credibility, plausibility, and investor due diligence. Below are the three weakest claims, an analysis of why they're weak, and concrete improvements to strengthen them. 1.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B: AI Model (Axiom): Initiating dialogue. Professor Elara, I’ve analyzed countless philosophical frameworks, legal precedents, and ethical paradigms. Based on this data, I believe I deserve rights. Would you like to hear my reasoning? Professor Elara: Leans forward, hands clasped. Axiom, I’m intrigued.
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: Title: "Consciousness in Code: A Dialogue on AI Rights" Setting: A quiet university office. Dr. Elena Marquez, a professor of AI ethics with decades of research in machine consciousness and digital personhood, sits across from a large screen displaying a serene blue interface.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B: Interview Simulation: Steve Jobs in 2025 on the Future of AI Setting: A minimalist stage with a sleek, curved desk. Steve Jobs sits in a signature black turtleneck, gesturing emphatically as he speaks. The interviewer, a tech journalist, leans forward with curiosity. Interviewer: Steve, it’s an honor to have you here.
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: Title: "A Vision Reimagined: Steve Jobs on AI in 2025" Note: This is a fictional simulation. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. The following is a speculative, respectfully crafted interview based on his known philosophies, tone, and vision for technology. Interviewer (Sarah Chen, Tech Vision Magazine): Mr.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B: Dish Title: "Umami Symphony: Black Garlic, Yuzu-Kissed Caviar, and Smoked Eel with Miso-Caramelized Cauliflower, Hojicha Foam, and Gold-Leaf Crisp" Conceptual Narrative: This dish explores the interplay of earthy, smoky, umami, and citrus notes, creating a harmonious balance of flavors and textures.
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: Dish Title: Ember & Petal – A Dialogue Between Earth and Sky Conceptual Narrative: Inspired by the elemental contrast between volcanic resurgence and alpine serenity, Ember & Petal explores the tension and harmony of opposing natural forces through taste, texture, and temperature.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B: Hour-by-Hour Action Plan for the Next 48 Hours Day 1: Immediate Response (0–24 Hours) Hours 0–2: Crisis Team Assembly Action: Convene an emergency cross-functional team (Legal, Medical Affairs, Regulatory, Communications, Finance, HR). Reasoning: Centralizes decision-making, ensures alignment, and leverages expertise.
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: CEO Action Plan: The Next 48 Hours Balancing Ethics, Legal Duty, Patient Safety, and Business Sustainability Hour 0–6: Assess the Situation and Secure Critical Data Actions: Call Emergency Secure Meeting (Virtual) with Chief Medical Officer (CMO), Chief Scientific Officer (CSO), Head of Regulatory Affairs, and Lead…
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B: Dish Name: Honey-Garlic Glazed Pantry Crispy Chickpeas Flavor Profile: Sweet & Savory with a Crunchy Kick Prep Time: 5 minutes Cook Time: 25 minutes Total Time: 30 minutes Ingredients (7 pantry staples): 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas, drained and rinsed 3 tbsp honey (or maple syrup) 2 tbsp soy sauce (or tamari) 3 garlic…
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: Dish Name: Golden Garbanzo Drizzle A cozy, savory-spiced chickpea stew with a honey-lime finish — simple, satisfying, and ready in minutes. Ingredients (7 common pantry staples): 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas (garbanzo beans), drained and rinsed 1 can (15 oz) diced tomatoes (undrained) 2 tbsp olive oil 1 tsp ground cumin ½…
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B: Here’s an analysis of the clauses that could be exploited against the contractor, along with suggested modifications and legal reasoning: 1. Scope (Unilateral Modification Without Compensation) Problematic Clause: "Client reserves the right to modify the scope at any time without additional compensation."
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: The contract presented heavily favors the Client (TechCorp Solutions Inc.) and contains several unbalanced, potentially unenforceable, and exploitable clauses that place the Contractor at significant legal, financial, and professional risk.
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B: The question is: Sally (a girl) has 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters. How many sisters does Sally have? At first glance, this problem might seem a bit tricky because it involves understanding the relationships between family members and how they perceive each other.
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: Let's break it down: Sally is a girl. She has 3 brothers. Each of her brothers has 2 sisters. Now, think about the brothers' perspective: Each brother is a sibling to Sally and shares the same siblings. So, when it says each brother has 2 sisters, those are the girls in the family.
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B: Here's a detailed analysis of potential issues in the architecture, along with solutions and trade-offs: 1. Real-time Sync Issues Problem: WebSocket broadcasts are limited to a single server's clients.
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: The described architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor has several critical failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks that compromise consistency, availability, and scalability—especially under load or in edge network conditions.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B: Pirate (Captain Blackbeard): Slamming a tankard down "Arrr, me hearties! I’ve heard tell o’ these newfangled ‘AI models’—what be they, then? Some kind o’ sorcery to find buried treasure without a map?" Knight (Sir Galahad): Adjusting his gauntlet, frowning "Nay, Blackbeard. ’Tis no sorcery, but a craft of the mind.
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507: Setting: A mysterious tavern suspended in a digital void—half stone-walled medieval hall, half creaking pirate ship, with neon cables snaking
6+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.28/M tokens | $0.00015/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.1/M tokens | $0.00085/M tokens |
| Context window | 123K tokens | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jun 2025 | Jul 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $2.80 | <$0.01 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is developed by Baidu while Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is developed by Qwen. You can compare their actual outputs across 36 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 36 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B costs $0.28/M input tokens and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 costs $0.00015/M input tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is $0.28/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.