Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Thinking Machines: Inkling
Compare Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking by Google AI against Thinking Machines: Inkling by Thinking Machines, context windows of 500K vs 1.0M, tested across 20 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Thinking Machines: Inkling
Gemini 2.0 Flash ThinkingRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Thinking Machines: Inkling has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is 8.1x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input
$0.25
4.0× cheaper
Output
$0.50
8.1× cheaper
Thinking Machines: Inkling
Input
$1.00
Output
$4.05
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is cheaper on both — 4.0× input, 8.1× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
42%
Thinking Machines: Inkling uses 3.9x more emoji
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Thinking Machines: Inkling
54%Vocabulary57%
15wSentence Length19w
0.64Hedging0.30
3.8Bold5.0
2.4Lists2.7
0.00Emoji0.04
0.03Headings0.49
0.30Transitions0.06
Based on 13 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
