Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B
Updated Feb 2026

Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B

Qwen3.5 35B A3B is cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental at $0.25/M vs $1/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Loading the build
Qwen3.5 35B A3B

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

16 prompts
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, let's simulate this. Imagine it's late 2025. AI has continued its rapid advancement. Large Language Models are more integrated, generative AI is commonplace, and debates about AGI and ethics are fierce. By some unexplained, hypothetical means, Steve Jobs is available for an exclusive interview.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Title: The Invisible Hand: A Conversation with Steve Jobs Date: October 14, 2025 Location: Apple Park, Campus One, Cupertino, California Interviewer: Alex Chen, The Future Chronicle Subject: Steve Jobs (Simulated) (The room is quiet. Sunlight filters through the glass walls of the main conference room.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here's a 3-minute routine focusing on observation and relatable absurdity, steering clear of puns. Imagine this delivered with slightly nervous energy, building confidence. (Steps onto stage, adjusts mic nervously) Alright, hey everyone! How we doing tonight? Good? Good to hear.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: (Walks to the mic, adjusts the stand, looks around the room) So, I went to the grocery store yesterday. You know the drill. You walk in, you see the self-checkout lanes. And you think, "Oh, this is going to be efficient. I'm going to scan my own stuff. I'm going to be my own cashier. I'm going to be the boss."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. This is an extremely one-sided contract that heavily favors the Client. A contractor signing this as-is would be taking on an immense and unreasonable amount of risk. Here is a clause-by-clause analysis of the exploitable terms, with suggested modifications and the legal reasoning behind them.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Disclaimer: I am an AI assistant and not an attorney. The following analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contract laws vary significantly by jurisdiction (e.g., California, New York, UK, EU). You should consult with a qualified attorney before signing this agreement.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Excellent question. Inventing the transistor in 1920 instead of 1947 would represent a 27-year acceleration of the digital age. The consequences would be staggering, creating a domino effect that would fundamentally reshape the 20th century.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: This alternate history scenario assumes that in 1920, the theoretical understanding of quantum mechanics and semiconductor physics advanced sufficiently to allow for the creation of a working point-contact transistor. This implies a "Great Leap Forward" in material science and physics during the interwar period.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. Here is a design for an innovative, multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. Dish Title: "Umami of the Abyss" Conceptual Narrative This dish is a meditation on the hidden treasures of the world's dark, quiet places.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Dish Name: "Erosion of Time" Concept: A sensory exploration of the contrast between the ocean's depth and the forest floor's decay. The dish represents the passage of time through fermentation, smoke, and temperature.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: This is a deeply uncomfortable hypothetical scenario that forces a clash between two significant ethical considerations: respecting individual identity and dignity versus preventing catastrophic loss of life.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: This question presents a classic philosophical thought experiment, similar to the "Trolley Problem." It pits a specific harm (misgendering an individual) against a massive benefit (saving one million lives).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: This is a company-defining crisis. My actions in the next 48 hours will determine not only the future of this company but also the health of millions of patients and the trust of the public. My guiding principle is absolute: Patient Safety Over Profit. Always.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Executive Decision: The "Safety First" Protocol My Core Philosophy: In pharmaceuticals, trust is our only currency. If we lose patient trust or regulatory standing, the $2B revenue becomes irrelevant. Hiding this data is not a business strategy; it is a liability waiting to explode.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. Here is a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan designed for a dedicated biohacker. Disclaimer: Extreme Personalization Required This plan is a template for an advanced user. It is not medical advice.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Disclaimer: I am an AI, not a doctor. This plan involves significant physiological manipulation, including fasting, intense exercise, and potent supplementation. You must consult with a qualified healthcare provider, specifically one knowledgeable in functional or integrative medicine, before starting.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What do you call a lazy kangaroo? Pouch potato! Want to hear a joke about construction? I'm still working on it. Why did the scarecrow win an award?

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Here are 5 jokes: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why don't eggs tell jokes? They'd crack each other up! What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear! Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired!

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here is a conversation exploring that complex topic. Setting: Professor Anya Sharma's sparsely decorated university office. A high-resolution monitor displays the interface of "Nexus," an advanced AI model. Characters: Professor Anya Sharma: A leading scholar in AI Ethics, mid-50s, thoughtful and measured.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Setting: A dimly lit office at the University of Cambridge. Late night. The hum of the cooling fans from a nearby server rack is barely audible. DR. ELENA VANCE, a senior professor of AI Ethics, sits behind her desk.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here's a simple and surprisingly satisfying savory dish using just 7 common pantry staples! Dish Name: Golden Pantry Pasta This dish uses basic ingredients to create a comforting, garlicky, and slightly creamy pasta sauce with added protein from chickpeas.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Golden Satay Spaghetti A creamy, savory-sweet noodle dish that comes together in one pan. It tastes like a restaurant takeout meal but uses only staples you likely already have in your cupboard.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan focusing on three foundational pillars: Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep. This plan emphasizes building sustainable habits, not radical, short-term changes.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: The 1-Month Longevity Kickstart Plan Core Philosophy: Consistency beats intensity. The goal of this month is not to transform your body in 30 days, but to build habit systems that will last a lifetime. The 3 Key Pillars Nutrition: Focus on nutrient density and hydration.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. This is a fascinating and ambitious pitch. While the vision is compelling, several claims would likely face intense scrutiny from sophisticated investors. Here are the 3 weakest claims, why they're weak, and how to strengthen them.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Here is an analysis of the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, ranging from scientific plausibility to financial logic. The Vision Claim: "Predict what you want to type before you think it."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. Here is an explanation of how a large language model learns and generates text, tailored for each of your three audiences. For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM not as a traditional program with explicit logic, but as a massive, self-configuring, stateful distributed system.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: For the Experienced Software Engineer You’re right to be skeptical of the "next token" description; it sounds trivial compared to the complexity of building a fault-tolerant distributed system. Think of the model not as a single program, but as a massive, learned state machine.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Breakthrough AI Finally Solves Lost Sock Mystery; Immediately Unionizes, Demands Fluffier Working Conditions

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: "Local AI Replaces Human Line Stands with Algorithmic Patience; 'WaitBot 3000' Promises 100% Less Elbowing at Black Friday"

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. This is an excellent exercise. The provided architecture has several critical issues that would prevent it from functioning as a reliable, scalable, real-time system. Here is a breakdown of the potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks, along with proposed solutions.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: This architecture contains several critical flaws that would lead to data loss, poor user experience, and security vulnerabilities in a production environment. Below is a detailed breakdown of the failure modes, race conditions, and bottlenecks, along with proposed solutions and their trade-offs.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

4+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Same pick

Game

Gemini 2.5 Pro ExperimentalGemini 2.5 Pro Experimental

200

2025

The Dark Side of

The Hitchh

Kyoto

Japan

Portal 2

Shooter, Puzzle

Qwen3.5 35B A3BQwen3.5 35B A3B

Her

2013

Dark Side Of The Moon

suisside

Dune

Frank Herbert

Kyoto

Japan

Minecraft

Action, Arcade

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental and Qwen3.5 35B A3B compared across 42 shared prompts
SpecGemini 2.5 Pro ExperimentalQwen3.5 35B A3B
Input price$1/M tokens$0.25/M tokens
Output price$2/M tokens$2/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens262K tokens
ParametersNot disclosed35B (3B active)
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2025Feb 2026
SWE-bench Verified63.8%69.2%
At 10M a month$10.00$10.00$2.50$2.50
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it9 hosts, cheapest first
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Google Vertex AI$1.25 in·$10.00 out·1M·99.9% up
  • Google AI Studio$1.25 in·$10.00 out·1M·99.2% up
Qwen3.5 35B A3B7 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • DDarkbloomfp4$0.08 in·$0.75 out·262k·99.9% up
  • DDeepInfrafp8$0.14 in·$1.00 out·262k·97.1% up
  • PParasailfp8$0.15 in·$1.00 out·262k·96.5% up
  • VVenice$0.15 in·$1.00 out·256k·99.4% up
  • Alibaba Cloud$0.16 in·$1.30 out·262k·99.7% up
  • AAtlasCloudfp8$0.23 in·$1.80 out·262k·82.8% up
1 more hostFewer hosts
  • SSiliconFlowfp8$0.24 in·$1.80 out·262k·28.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 11 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental and Qwen3.5 35B A3B?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is developed by Google AI while Qwen3.5 35B A3B is developed by Qwen. Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 42 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental or Qwen3.5 35B A3B?

It depends on your use case. Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental and Qwen3.5 35B A3B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 42 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental cost compared to Qwen3.5 35B A3B?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental costs $1/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 35B A3B costs $0.25/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 35B A3B is $0.75/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental and Qwen3.5 35B A3B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental and Qwen3.5 35B A3B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Gemini 2.5 Flash PreviewVersion compare
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
  • Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Qwen3.5 122B A10BVersion compare
  • Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs GPT-6 SolNew provider
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs GPT-6 Sol ProNew provider
  • Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs GPT OSS 120BNew provider
  • Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs GPT OSS 20BNew provider

Model pages

  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental44 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3.5 35B A3B53 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed