Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare Gemini 3 Flash Preview by Google AI against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 131K, tested across 55 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 5.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Input
$0.50
Output
$3.00
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
4.5× cheaper
Output
$0.60
5.0× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 4.5× input, 5.0× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
41%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 53.9x more emoji
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
55%Vocabulary56%
18wSentence Length14w
0.42Hedging0.37
7.1Bold5.7
4.5Lists4.0
0.00Emoji0.54
0.84Headings0.70
0.07Transitions0.14
Based on 24 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
