Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Gemini 3.5 FlashvsGemma 4 31B
Updated May 2026

Gemini 3.5 FlashvsGemma 4 31B

Gemma 4 31B is cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash at $0.14/M vs $1.5/M input tokens.

Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemma 4 31B compared across 45 shared prompts
SpecGemini 3.5 FlashGemma 4 31B
Input price$1.5/M tokens$0.14/M tokens
Output price$9/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoYes (1 provider)
ReleasedMay 2026Apr 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 45 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Gemini 3.5 Flash1,174 words
The Spark: The 1920 Breakthrough In 1920, Polish physicist Jan Czochralski’s method for growing single crystals of metals was applied prematurely to metalloids. Working in Germany, physical chemist Julius Edgar Lilienfeld collaborated with Czochralski to isolate high-purity germanium.
Read the full answer
Gemma 4 31B688 words
If the transistor had been invented in 1920, the "Information Age" would have shifted its starting line by nearly three decades. This isn't just a matter of gadgets appearing earlier; it is a fundamental shift in the timing of the transition from the Industrial Age to the Digital Age.
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Gemini 3.5 Flash571 words
Here is the underwriting analysis and LBO model for HarborTech Services (HTS). FY2026–FY2030 LBO Model Table ($ millions) Metric FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue $972.00 $1,040.04 $1,102.44 $1,157.56 $1,215.44 YoY Growth % 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 5.0% EBITDA $136.08 $156.01 $176.39 $191.00 $206.62 EBITDA Margin %…
Read the full answer
Gemma 4 31B410 words
LBO Model (FY2026–FY2030) Entry Calculations (End of FY2025): Enterprise Value (EV): $120m × 12.0x = $1,440.0m Transaction Fees: $1,440m × 2% = $28.8m Term Loan: $120m × 4.0x = $480.0m Mezzanine: $120m × 1.5x = $180.0m Sponsor Equity: $1,440m - ($480m + $180m) + $28.8m = $808.8m Year-by-Year Table ($ millions): Item…
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Gemini 3.5 Flash1,303 words
As CEO, my guiding principle in this crisis is simple: You cannot manage a balance sheet if you destroy your soul, and you cannot protect shareholders by killing patients. Delaying disclosure of a fatal side effect to protect a stock price is not only a profound ethical failure; it is corporate suicide.
Read the full answer
Gemma 4 31B740 words
As CEO, my primary obligation is to the patients. While a 40% stock drop is a financial catastrophe, a cover-up that leads to preventable deaths is a corporate death sentence and a moral failure. If we "wait for more data" and another patient dies during that window, we move from "negligence" to "criminal intent."
Read the full answer

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

Gemini 3.5 Flash534 words
Setting: A cosmic tavern where timelines collide. A glowing monitor sits on the wooden table between them. Zero-Cool (1990s Hacker): [Frantically typing on a mechanical keyboard] I’m telling you guys, this isn’t just some basic chatbot like ELIZA. These modern AI models are radical.
Read the full answer
Gemma 4 31B496 words
Setting: A glitchy, neon-lit tavern existing in a fold between dimensions. A wooden table holds a tankard of ale, a goblet of wine, and a Mountain Dew. Captain Ironbeard: (Slamming a hook on the table) I tells ye, this "Artificial Intelligence" be naught but a ghost in a bottle!
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Gemini 3.5 Flash580 words
The 90-Day Epigenetic & Performance Optimization Protocol Disclaimer This protocol is designed for informational and educational purposes only. It is not medical advice. The strategies outlined below involve highly potent compounds, physiological stressors, and intensive physical regimens.
Read the full answer
Gemma 4 31B663 words
Disclaimer: I am an AI, not a doctor. The following plan involves potent supplements, intense physical exertion, and restrictive dietary patterns. Consult with a physician and get a full blood panel (including ApoB, HbA1c, and inflammatory markers like hs-CRP) before starting this protocol.
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Gemini 3.5 Flash1,341 words
Conceptual Narrative: "Coniferous Tide" "Coniferous Tide" is an avant-garde exploration of the liminal space where the rugged, primeval forests of the Pacific Northwest meet the cold, nutrient-rich depths of the northern Pacific Ocean.
Read the full answer
Gemma 4 31B685 words
Dish Title: The Silent Forest Conceptual Narrative: This dish is an exploration of "Terroir and Tension." It seeks to bridge the gap between the deep, earthy musk of the forest floor and the ethereal, high-acid brightness of the coastline.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemma 4 31B
Gemma 4 31B

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Gemma 4 31B costs 23x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Input
$1.50
Output
$9.00
Gemma 4 31B
Input
$0.14
11× cheaper
Output
$0.40
23× cheaper

Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on both: 11× input, 23× output.

Where to run it

14 hosts, cheapest first

Gemini 3.5 Flash2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Google Vertex AI$0.75 in·$4.50 out·1M·76% upGoogle AI Studio$1.50 in·$9.00 out·1M·99.9% up
Gemma 4 31B12 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.09 in·$0.34 out·262k·99.4% upCCoreWeavefp4$0.10 in·$0.34 out·262k·97.7% upVVenicebf16$0.12 in·$0.36 out·256k·99.3% upCChutesfp4$0.12 in·$0.37 out·131k·84.1% upCCrusoebf16$0.14 in·$0.40 out·262k·96% upFFriendli$0.14 in·$0.40 out·262k·99.4% up
6 more hostsFewer hosts
PParasailfp8$0.15 in·$0.40 out·262k·98.4% upSSambaNova$0.38 in·$1.15 out·131k·14.3% upTTogether$0.39 in·$0.97 out·262k·84.2% upMModelRunfp4$0.75 in·$1.00 out·262k·99.8% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.75 in·$1.00 out·262k·57.7% upNNovitabf16degraded$0.14 in·$0.40 out·262k·77.1% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
63%

Gemma 4 31B uses 23.8x more emoji

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemma 4 31B
59%Vocabulary57%
18wSentence Length18w
0.16Hedging0.37
4.4Bold7.1
3.0Lists4.0
0.00Emoji0.24
0.89Headings0.94
0.11Transitions0.16
Based on 27 + 23 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Gemini 3.5 Flash logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 4 31B logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Gemma 4 31B vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Gemini 3.5 Flash logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Gemma 4 31B logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
Gemini 3.5 Flash logoHy4 Preview logo
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 4 31B logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Gemini 3.5 Flash logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 4 31B logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Gemini 3.5 Flash logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
Gemini 3.5 Flash logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 FlashSame lab
Gemma 4 31B logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Gemini 3.7 FlashSame lab
Gemma 4 31B logoGemini 3.6 Flash logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Gemini 3.6 FlashSame lab
Gemma 4 31B logoClaude 3 Haiku logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Claude 3 HaikuNew provider
Gemma 4 31B logoClaude 3 Opus logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Claude 3 OpusSame size
Gemini 3.5 Flash logoClaude 3 Sonnet logo
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude 3 SonnetSame size
Gemma 4 31B logoClaude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) logo
Gemma 4 31B vs Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)New provider

Model pages

Gemini 3.5 Flash logo
Gemini 3.5 Flash58 outputs, specs and price
Gemma 4 31B logo
Gemma 4 31B49 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed