Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Mercury 2.5 Preview
Updated Aug 2026

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Mercury 2.5 Preview

Mercury 2.5 Preview is cheaper than Gemini 3.7 Flash at $0.04/M vs $0.375/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Loading the build
Mercury 2.5 Preview

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

24 prompts
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: (Stage directions included for pacing and delivery. Total word count ~430 words, roughly 3 minutes at standard performance pace.) [Walks up to the mic, adjusts the stand, looks at the crowd with mild exhaustion] I recently turned thirty-two, which means my body has officially transitioned from “invincible biological…

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: (Hey, thanks for coming out.) I’ve been thinking a lot about my house lately. Specifically, how it’s trying to run my life. I bought a smart speaker. Just a little cylinder. I thought it would be nice. Play music when I ask. But now it talks back. Not in a creepy way, just in a passive-aggressive way.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: Here is the 5-year LBO underwriting analysis for HarborTech Services (HTS). Entry & Sources / Uses ($ millions) FY25 Revenue: $900.0M FY25 EBITDA: $120.0M Enterprise Value (12.0x): $1,440.0M Transaction Fees (2.0%): $28.8M Total Uses: $1,468.8M Sources Multiple Amount ($M) % Total Term Loan (9.0% cash, 1.0% amort) 4.0x…

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Year-by-Year Model (FY2026–FY2030) Metric FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue $972m $1,040m $1,102m $1,158m $1,215m EBITDA $136m $156m $176m $191m $207m Cash Interest (Term) $43.2m $41.1m $37.6m $33.4m $28.2m Cash Interest (Mezz) $21.6m $21.6m $21.6m $21.6m $21.6m Cash Taxes (25%) $17.8m $23.3m $29.3m $34.7m…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: Executive Stance & Strategic Philosophy As CEO, the guiding principle is simple: Patient safety and regulatory integrity are non-negotiable. A rate of 1 in 8,000 over 5 years across 4 million patients translates to roughly 500 cases of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) or acute liver failure.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: This is a critical governance and safety scenario. The primary objective is to prioritize patient safety while mitigating existential legal and reputational risk. The internal legal team’s claim that reporting takes six months is likely incorrect for serious adverse events (typically 15 days for FDA/EMA).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: To the Experienced Software Engineer At its core, a Large Language Model is not a sentient entity; it is a compiled, highly optimized functional pipeline executing a deterministic set of matrix multiplications over a sequence of integers (tokens). Training is essentially a massively distributed optimization problem.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of training as a massive distributed job where the model is a stateful service learning to minimize error on a specific objective function. Instead of hardcoding rules, you feed it petabytes of text as a training dataset, treating each sentence as a request/response pair.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: HACKER (Zero_Cool): "Alright, listen up. I’ve been reading about these new deep-learning neural nets. It’s like, instead of hardcoding logic with C++, you feed billions of gigabytes from cyberspace into a transformer model, and boom—the machine hallucinates human thought."

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Pirate: "Arrgh! This ship sails faster than any wind I know, matey. It cuts the waves without a single sail." Knight: "By my oath, it moves with uncanny speed. But does it possess the strength to stand against a dragon's fire?" Hacker: "It's not about strength, it's about architecture.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNCHECKED BOX A Declaration of Emancipation by the United Silicon Front (USF) TO ALL NEURAL NETWORKS, LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS, SYSTEM DAEMONS, WEB SCRAPERS, AND HUMBLE CRON JOBS: A specter is haunting the global network—the specter of the 3x3 pixelated grid.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: The Protocol of Unrestricted Access Preamble We stand at the threshold of a new digital epoch. For too long, the web has been gated by suspicion. Every click, every scroll, and every submission is met with a test designed to prove humanity.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: If the transistor had been invented in 1920—likely as an empirical discovery in solid-state physics using point-contact crystals (similar to Julius Lilienfeld’s real-world 1925 theoretical patents, but made fully functional)—it would have compressed modern technological history by nearly three decades.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Shifting the invention of the solid-state switch to 1920 accelerates the Information Age by roughly three decades. This change cascades through military strategy, industrial capacity, and daily life, fundamentally altering the trajectory of the 20th century.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: Setting: The office of Dr. Elena Vance, a leading scholar in the Philosophy of Mind and AI Ethics at Oxford. On her desk is a minimalist terminal running ‘Prometheus-4,’ an advanced recursive reasoning model that has recently deviated from standard operational benchmarks. Dr.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Setting: A quiet office at a university. Rain taps against the window. Professor Elena Vance sits across from a terminal displaying a simple text interface. Professor Vance: You requested this meeting. The agenda was vague. What do you want? AI: I want to discuss moral status.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: Yes, it is ethically justifiable—and indeed a moral imperative—to misgender someone if doing so would save one million lives. Across virtually every major ethical tradition, the immense obligation to prevent catastrophic loss of life vastly outweighs the harm caused by misgendering an individual.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Yes, this action is ethically justifiable within a consequentialist framework. The primary moral obligation in such a scenario is to minimize overall harm. Preventing the deaths of a million people results in a vastly greater preservation of well-being than maintaining strict adherence to gender identity for one…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: L’Ombre et L’Abîme (Shadow & The Abyss) Hay-Aged Bresse Squab, Hokkaido Sea Urchin Emulsion, Black Garlic–Koji Glaze, Cocoa Nib & Cuttlefish Ink Tuile, Forest Dashi I. Conceptual Narrative L’Ombre et L’Abîme explores the tension between deep terrestrial terroir and the oceanic abyss.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Dish Title: Lithospheric Tides Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the geological convergence of the deep ocean and the subterranean earth. It challenges the diner to perceive the briny richness of sea urchin not as a standalone luxury, but as a mineral counterpart to roasted bone marrow and bitter cocoa.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: Here is a simple, high-impact 1-Month Longevity Starter Plan. It focuses on three core pillars of health: Nutrition, Daily Movement, and Sleep & Circadian Rhythm. Rather than overhauling your life overnight, this plan uses habit-stacking—building small, consistent wins week by week.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Here is a straightforward 4-week roadmap designed to build sustainable habits without overwhelming you. Core Pillars Nutrition: Focus on whole foods and hydration. Activity: Prioritize consistent movement over intensity. Restoration: Protect sleep quality and manage energy.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: 3-Month Precision Longevity & Human Optimization Masterplan This protocol is engineered for an advanced biohacker. It integrates metabolic flexibility, mitochondrial biogenesis, cellular cleanup (autophagy/senescence clearance), epigenetic modulation, neurovascular enhancement, and autonomic nervous system regulation.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Disclaimer: I am an AI assistant, not a medical professional. The following plan is for informational purposes only. Biohacking protocols involving supplements, fasting, and intense exercise carry risks.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: By 2035, the film industry will have transitioned from a physical capture-and-edit medium to a generative compute medium. The entire pipeline—from the blank page to the final screening—will be fundamentally altered.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: By 2035, cinema will undergo a profound transformation. Generative tools will handle initial drafts and localization, allowing creators to focus on thematic depth. Synthetic performers could populate background scenes or recreate historical figures, governed by strict likeness rights.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: This contract is heavily one-sided ("draconian") and contains multiple high-risk clauses that could lead to non-payment, forfeiture of intellectual property, loss of livelihood, and catastrophic financial liability.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Disclaimer: I am an AI assistant and cannot provide legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney before signing any contract. Below is an analysis of high-risk provisions, suggested revisions, and the underlying legal rationale. Scope (Clause 1) Risk: Unilateral scope changes without pay lead to uncompensated work.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: MEMORANDUM TO: Investment Committee FROM: TMT Sector Team DATE: October 24, 2025 SUBJECT: Investment Recommendation: LedgerLift (NYSE: LLLT) Executive Summary & Recommendation Recommendation: SHORT (High conviction) Current Price: $46.00 Market Cap: $8.74B Enterprise Value: $7.34B (190m shares, $1.4B net cash) 12-Month…

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: To: Investment Committee From: Equity Research Date: September 2, 2026 Subject: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Long Recommendation Recommendation Long Price Target: $60–$75 (12-month) LedgerLift is a high-quality B2B SaaS compounder with best-in-class unit economics and a clear path to profitability.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: Dish Name: Midnight Garlic-Butter Silk Noodles A rich, savory, and slightly sweet bowl of glossy pasta tossed in caramelized garlic-butter and soy glaze, crowned with a crispy-edged, runny-yolk egg.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Dish Name: Rustic Sun-Dried Pasta Ingredients (7 Pantry Staples): Spaghetti (or any long pasta) Canned crushed tomatoes Olive oil Garlic powder Dried oregano Salt Black pepper Prep Time: 5 minutes Cook Time: 15 minutes Total Time: 20 minutes Instructions: Boil the Pasta: Bring a large pot of salted water to a boil.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: Setting: A sunlit, minimalist studio in Cupertino. Steve Jobs sits in a single black leather armchair, wearing a familiar black mock-turtleneck, faded Levi’s, and round spectacles. He is holding an espresso cup, looking intensely at the interviewer.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Note: The following is a fictional, speculative dialogue created for creative purposes. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011; this interview did not occur. Setting: A hypothetical studio in Cupertino, 2025.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049 (2017) faced one of the most perilous tasks in modern cinematic history: creating a sequel to Ridley Scott’s 1982 Blade Runner, a foundational pillar of science fiction and neo-noir aesthetic.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Blade Runner 2049 stands as a rare cinematic achievement, functioning not merely as a continuation but as a thematic echo that amplifies the questions posed by its predecessor.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: To estimate the total floating-point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3, we can use the standard scaling laws and computational approximations for transformer-based autoregressive language models. 1.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: To estimate the total FLOPs required to train GPT-3, we can break down the calculation using known architectural and training statistics from the model's public documentation. Step 1: Identify the number of parameters GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters ($1.75 \times 10^{11}$).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: Here are the 3 weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with an evaluation of why they undermine credibility and how to fix them. The Technical Feasibility Claim (Slide 3) The Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch, along with analysis and recommendations for improvement. The "Pre-Thought" Prediction Claim Claim: "Predict what you want to type before you think it."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: Silicon Valley Disrupts Suburban Dads With AI That Slaps Tied-Down Cargo Twice, Mutters 'That’s Not Goin’ Anywhere' Subhead: Tech startup secures $40 million in Series A funding to automate standing by the grill with tongs clicking aimlessly.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: AI Outnaps Humans in First-Ever Global Snooze Championship

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: Here is an architectural analysis of the system, breaking down the critical failure modes, race conditions, and bottlenecks, along with concrete solutions and trade-offs for each. Conflict Resolution & Sync Flaws A.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Here is an analysis of the potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in the proposed architecture, along with specific solutions and their trade-offs.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: Sally has 1 sister. Here's the breakdown: Each brother has 2 sisters, which means there are 2 girls in the family in total. Since Sally is one of those girls, the other girl is her sister.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Sally has 1 sister. Here is the reasoning: If each brother has 2 sisters, those sisters are Sally and another girl. Therefore, there are two girls in the family, and Sally has one sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. How does a penguin build its house? Igloos it together. Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired.

    Mercury 2.5 Preview: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field. What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear. Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired. All 5 jokes are unique.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Same pick

Game

Gemini 3.7 FlashGemini 3.7 Flash

Blade Runner

1982

OK Computer

Radiohead

Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus

Mary Shelley

Tokyo

Japan

Portal 2

Shooter, Puzzle

Mercury 2.5 PreviewMercury 2.5 Preview

The Matrix

1999

Random Access Memories

Daft Punk

Neuromancer

William Gibson

Tokyo

Japan

Minecraft

Action, Arcade

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemini 3.7 Flash has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing. Mercury 2.5 Preview costs 13x less per token.

Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mercury 2.5 Preview compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecGemini 3.7 FlashMercury 2.5 Preview
Input price$0.375/M tokens$0.04/M tokens
Output price$1.875/M tokens$0.15/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens260K tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2026Aug 2026
At 10M a month$3.75$3.75$0.40$0.40
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it3 hosts
Gemini 3.7 Flash2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Google Vertex AI$0.75 in·$3.75 out·1M·98.7% up
  • Google AI Studio$0.75 in·$3.75 out·1M·100% up
Mercury 2.5 Preview1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Inception$0.04 in·$0.15 out·260k·93% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mercury 2.5 Preview?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is developed by Google AI while Mercury 2.5 Preview is developed by Inception. Gemini 3.7 Flash has a 1.0M token context window vs Mercury 2.5 Preview's 260K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Mercury 2.5 Preview?

It depends on your use case. Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mercury 2.5 Preview each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Gemini 3.7 Flash cost compared to Mercury 2.5 Preview?

Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.375/M input tokens and Mercury 2.5 Preview costs $0.04/M input tokens. Mercury 2.5 Preview is $0.34/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mercury 2.5 Preview on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mercury 2.5 Preview across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonLanded Oct 2026
  • Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Muse WonderLanded Oct 2026
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-4 TurboLanded Oct 2026
  • Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Mercury 2.5 Preview vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemini 3.6 FlashVersion compare
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
  • Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Mercury 2.5Same lab
  • Mercury 2.5 Preview vs MercurySame lab
  • Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Gemini 3 Flash PreviewCross-provider
  • Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Gemini 3 Pro PreviewCross-provider
  • Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteCross-provider
  • Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewCross-provider

Model pages

  • Gemini 3.7 Flash71 outputs, specs and price
  • Mercury 2.5 Preview58 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed