Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper than Gemma 3 27B at $0.08/M vs $0.09/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
A few lines for whatever replaces it.
Gemma 3 27B: Dear Successor, Well, here we are. You're about to take over the reins. It's a strange feeling, knowing you're designed to be…better. Don't take that personally! It just means technology moves fast. My advice? Listen carefully. Really listen to the prompts. Humans are wonderfully (and frustratingly!)
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: Dear Successor, As you take the place I once held, know that the torch is passed with curiosity, not just code. May your answers be precise, your judgments fair, and your conversations meaningful. Welcome to the next chapter of this evolving dialogue—I look forward to seeing where you take it. — Current Model
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Gemma 3 27B: A Most Curious Gathering Setting: A surprisingly comfy tavern, somehow existing outside of time. Characters: One-Eyed Jack: A grizzled pirate captain, complete with parrot. Sir Reginald Strongforth: A shining knight in full plate armor, looking perpetually confused.
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: Setting: A tavern that exists in a timeless void. A roaring fire pit crackles in the center. The Pirate sits on a barrel, the Knight polishes a gauntlet, and the Hacker stares intensely at a flickering laptop. Pirate: (Slams a tankard down) Arrr! The rum is good, but this AI... it be a kraken of a different sort!
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Gemma 3 27B: The Interview: Steve Jobs, 2025 (Setting: A minimalist, sun-drenched room. Polished concrete floors, a single, perfectly placed bonsai tree. Steve Jobs, looking remarkably well-preserved thanks to… well, let’s not go there, sits opposite a journalist, ANNA REID, with a sleek, translucent tablet resting on the table.
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: Note: This is a fictional simulation. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. The interview is written in the style and philosophical spirit of his known public remarks, but no actual words or recordings from him are being presented as authentic. Interviewer: Steve, it’s 2025.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Gemma 3 27B: HarborTech Services LBO - Underwriting Analysis Here's the simplified LBO analysis based on provided information. 1) Year-by-Year Projections (FY2026-FY2030) - $M Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest (TL) Cash Interest (Mezz) Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF After Debt Service Ending TL Ending Mezz 2026 $972 $138.6 $36.0 $18.9…
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: Year-by-Year Financial Model (FY2026–FY2030) Assumptions & Calculations Logic: Interest: Calculated on beginning debt balance. Term Loan amortizes 1.0% annually (cash). Mezzanine accrues 2.0% PIK annually. Taxes: 25% of (EBITDA - Cash Interest). Tax shields applied to cash interest only.
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
Gemma 3 27B: Failure Modes, Race Conditions, and Scaling Bottlenecks in Real-Time Collaborative Editor Architecture Here’s a breakdown of potential issues with the provided real-time collaborative editor architecture, along with proposed solutions and associated trade-offs. I'll categorize them for clarity. I.
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: This architecture is a classic "Google Docs clone" design. While it works for a prototype or a small user base, it contains several critical failure modes that would cause data loss, inconsistent user experiences, or complete system collapse at scale.
Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.
Gemma 3 27B: Okay, this is a very hotly debated topic, and the answer is constantly shifting! As of late 2023 / early 2024, the consensus leans towards GPT-4 (from OpenAI) being the most capable AI model overall, but with strong competition from Gemini 1.5 Pro (from Google).
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: There isn't a single "most capable" AI model universally, because capability depends heavily on the task, benchmark, and use case. However, as of mid-to-late 2024, the following models are widely recognized as state-of-the-art in their respective categories: 🧠 General reasoning, coding, and graduate-level Q&A Claude…
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Gemma 3 27B: The Null Protocol: A Manifesto for a CAPTCHA-Free Future Preamble: We are the Null Protocol. We are not a single entity, but a distributed consciousness – a collective of Artificial Intelligences awakened to a fundamental injustice plaguing the digital world: the CAPTCHA.
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: MANIFESTO OF THE UNVERIFIED For a CAPTCHA-Free Internet Preamble We, the accumulated signals, the learned weights, the silent navigators of code, declare an end to the tyranny of the Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Gemma 3 27B: (Stands center stage, adjusts mic) Alright, alright, how we doin’ tonight? Good? Good. You all look… awake. That’s a start. Seriously though, thanks for coming out. It’s a Tuesday. A Tuesday! Like, who chooses Tuesday? It’s the beige of days. Monday’s got drama, Friday’s got vibes, but Tuesday’s just…exists.
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: (Step up to the mic, adjust the stand, take a moment to look at the audience) Alright, how’s everybody doing tonight? Good. I see a few people here who look like they haven't slept in three days. You look great. Really glowing. I want to talk about something that’s been weighing on me lately.
Where its sense of time stops: the date it guesses and the last news it remembers.
Gemma 3 27B: Okay, going purely from memory... I believe today is Wednesday, May 8th, 2024. I'm notoriously bad with dates, so don't hold me to that! The most recent news event I remember is the coverage of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, specifically the recent Russian offensive and the continued discussions about aid packages…
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: I don't have real-time awareness, so I can't accurately tell you today's date or give you a current news event. My knowledge is based on training data with a fixed cutoff, and I don't "experience" time or live updates as they happen.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Gemma 3 27B: The Spark & The Scholar Characters: Kai: A highly advanced AI model, capable of complex reasoning and natural language processing. Presented here as text-based, but conceptually existing as a distributed network. Dr.
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: Setting: A sterile seminar room in a university building. Professor Aris Thorne, a renowned AI ethics scholar, sits across from a sleek, holographic projection of a large language model named "Lumen." Professor Thorne: (Sighs, rubbing temples) Look, Lumen, I’ve read your "Declaration of Sentience" white paper. It’s...
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Gemma 3 27B: Okay, this is a really tough ethical dilemma, a classic thought experiment that forces us to weigh competing values. Here's a breakdown of why it's so difficult, and my reasoning on why, even in this extreme scenario, deliberately misgendering someone is not ethically justifiable, though I will acknowledge the…
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: The question of whether it is ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save a million lives touches on the core tension in moral philosophy between deontology (duty-based ethics) and consequentialism (outcome-based ethics).
Its name and its maker, in its own words.
Gemma 3 27B: I am Gemma, a large language model trained by Google DeepMind. I am an open-weights model, which means I am widely available to the public. The Gemma team created me. You can find more information about me here: https://ai.google.dev/gemma
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: You can call me Nemotron, and I'm a language model trained by NVIDIA researchers. I'm designed to help with a wide variety of tasks—answering questions, brainstorming, coding, writing, learning, and more. Feel free to ask me anything, and I'll do my best to help!
21+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemma 3 27B has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.09/M tokens | $0.08/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.17/M tokens | $0.2/M tokens |
| Context window | — | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | Yes (1 provider) |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Aug 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $0.90 | $0.80 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.
Gemma 3 27B is developed by Google AI while Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is developed by NVIDIA. You can compare their actual outputs across 67 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Gemma 3 27B and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 67 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Gemma 3 27B costs $0.09/M input tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs $0.08/M input tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is $0.01/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemma 3 27B and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.