Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen3 235B A22B

Compare Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B by Google AI against Qwen3 235B A22B by Qwen, context windows of 262K vs 33K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Qwen3 235B A22B?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 235B A22B are both competitive models. Context windows: 262K vs 33K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 235B A22B

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is made by google while Qwen3 235B A22B is from qwen. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has a 262K token context window compared to Qwen3 235B A22B's 33K.

Our Verdict
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Qwen3 235B A22B
Qwen3 235B A22B

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
82%

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B uses 31.2x more hedging

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Qwen3 235B A22B
58%Vocabulary68%
18wSentence Length9w
0.31Hedging0.00
6.8Bold5.8
3.3Lists3.7
0.00Emoji0.74
0.74Headings0.00
0.15Transitions0.12
Based on 27 + 2 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4BQwen3 235B A22B
FAQ