Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Llama 3.1 405B
Compare Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI against Llama 3.1 405B by Meta AI, context windows of 262K vs 128K, tested across 11 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 31B or Llama 3.1 405B?
Google: Gemma 4 31B and Llama 3.1 405B are both competitive models. Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $2.7/M for Llama 3.1 405B. Context windows: 262K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Google: Gemma 4 31B and Llama 3.1 405B
Google: Gemma 4 31B is made by google while Llama 3.1 405B is from meta. Google: Gemma 4 31B has a 262K token context window compared to Llama 3.1 405B's 128K. On pricing, Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $2.7/M for Llama 3.1 405B.
No community votes yet. On paper, Google: Gemma 4 31B has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Google: Gemma 4 31B is 7.8x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Google: Gemma 4 31B uses 707.4x more bold
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
