Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Compare Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI against Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B by Qwen, context windows of 262K vs 262K, tested across 44 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 31B or Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
Google: Gemma 4 31B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B are both competitive models. Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $0.6/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Context windows: 262K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Google: Gemma 4 31B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Google: Gemma 4 31B is made by google while Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is from qwen. Google: Gemma 4 31B has a 262K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. On pricing, Google: Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $0.6/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B.
No community votes yet. On paper, Google: Gemma 4 31B has the edge — newer, major provider backing.
Google: Gemma 4 31B is 9.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
