GLM 4 32BvsKimi K2 0905
GLM 4 32B is cheaper than Kimi K2 0905 at $0.1/M vs $0.6/M input tokens.
| Spec | GLM 4 32B | Kimi K2 0905 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.1/M tokens | $0.6/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.1/M tokens | $2.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jul 2025 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
Kimi K2 0905
GLM 4 32BRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Kimi K2 0905 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
GLM 4 32B costs 25x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GLM 4 32B
Input
$0.10
6.0× cheaper
Output
$0.10
25× cheaper
Kimi K2 0905
Input
$0.60
Output
$2.50
GLM 4 32B is cheaper on both: 6.0× input, 25× output.
Where to run it
1 host
GLM 4 32B
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Kimi K2 09051 host
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 8 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
29%
Kimi K2 0905 uses 11.5x more emoji
GLM 4 32B
Kimi K2 0905
55%Vocabulary65%
15wSentence Length21w
0.74Hedging0.16
4.9Bold2.8
3.8Lists3.0
0.00Emoji0.11
0.35Headings0.69
0.04Transitions0.06
Based on 27 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
