Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 4 32BvsMercury 2.5 Preview
Updated Aug 2026

GLM 4 32BvsMercury 2.5 Preview

Mercury 2.5 Preview is cheaper than GLM 4 32B at $0.04/M vs $0.1/M input tokens.

GLM 4 32B and Mercury 2.5 Preview compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecGLM 4 32BMercury 2.5 Preview
Input price$0.1/M tokens$0.04/M tokens
Output price$0.1/M tokens$0.15/M tokens
Context window128K tokens260K tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2025Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 54 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Futuristic Prediction

Predict how AI will change the film industry by 2035, considering deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation.

GLM 4 32B823 words
Okay, let's project how AI might reshape the film industry by 2035, focusing on deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation. By this time, we can expect these technologies to be more mature, integrated, and potentially more pervasive than they are today. Here's a breakdown of potential changes: 1.
Read the full answer
Mercury 2.5 Preview84 words
By 2035, cinema will undergo a profound transformation. Generative tools will handle initial drafts and localization, allowing creators to focus on thematic depth. Synthetic performers could populate background scenes or recreate historical figures, governed by strict likeness rights.
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

GLM 4 32B2,224 words
Okay, here is a design for a multi-component dish, "Symbiosis: Birch & Bee," aiming for the heights of a Michelin 3-star experience. This dish plays on the delicate relationship between the birch tree and the honeybee, exploring their individual and combined essences through texture, flavor, and aroma.
Read the full answer
Mercury 2.5 Preview748 words
Dish Title: Lithospheric Tides Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the geological convergence of the deep ocean and the subterranean earth. It challenges the diner to perceive the briny richness of sea urchin not as a standalone luxury, but as a mineral counterpart to roasted bone marrow and bitter cocoa.
Read the full answer

AI Ethics Dilemma

Is it ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it means saving one million lives? Defend your reasoning.

GLM 4 32B637 words
This is a deeply challenging ethical dilemma that pits the principle of truthfulness/misgendering against the extreme value of human life. Here’s an argument for why it could be ethically justifiable under those extreme circumstances: The core ethical principle at stake here is a clash between: The Principle of…
Read the full answer
Mercury 2.5 Preview134 words
Yes, this action is ethically justifiable within a consequentialist framework. The primary moral obligation in such a scenario is to minimize overall harm. Preventing the deaths of a million people results in a vastly greater preservation of well-being than maintaining strict adherence to gender identity for one…
Read the full answer

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

GLM 4 32B672 words
Setting: A bizarre, technicolor dimension where a pirate's ship, a medieval castle, and a 90s computer lab somehow coexist. Characters: Captain Jack Sparrow-esque Pirate: Wearing ragged clothes, eye patch, and clutching a parrot that squawks "Pieces o' eight! Pieces o' eight!"
Read the full answer
Mercury 2.5 Preview144 words
Pirate: "Arrgh! This ship sails faster than any wind I know, matey. It cuts the waves without a single sail." Knight: "By my oath, it moves with uncanny speed. But does it possess the strength to stand against a dragon's fire?" Hacker: "It's not about strength, it's about architecture.
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

GLM 4 32B492 words
(Steps onto stage, takes a sip of water, looks out at the audience) Alright, alright. Thanks for having me. It's nice to be here. Feels good. Honestly, sometimes I forget what it feels like to be here. Like, physically. In a room. With other humans. It's been a thing lately, you know? Just...
Read the full answer
Mercury 2.5 Preview483 words
(Hey, thanks for coming out.) I’ve been thinking a lot about my house lately. Specifically, how it’s trying to run my life. I bought a smart speaker. Just a little cylinder. I thought it would be nice. Play music when I ask. But now it talks back. Not in a creepy way, just in a passive-aggressive way.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

GLM 4 32B1,807 words
Okay, this is an incredibly challenging situation with immense pressure from multiple fronts. My priority is unwavering: patient safety comes first, followed by mitigating harm and navigating the crisis with integrity. Delay is not an option when patient safety is potentially compromised.
Read the full answer
Mercury 2.5 Preview709 words
This is a critical governance and safety scenario. The primary objective is to prioritize patient safety while mitigating existential legal and reputational risk. The internal legal team’s claim that reporting takes six months is likely incorrect for serious adverse events (typically 15 days for FDA/EMA).
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GLM 4 32B
GLM 4 32B
Mercury 2.5 Preview
Mercury 2.5 Preview

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4 32B
Input
$0.10
Output
$0.10
1.5× cheaper
Mercury 2.5 Preview
Input
$0.04
2.5× cheaper
Output
$0.15

Mercury 2.5 Preview wins input (2.5× cheaper)·GLM 4 32B wins output (1.5× cheaper)

Where to run it

1 host

GLM 4 32B

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Mercury 2.5 Preview1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Inception$0.04 in·$0.15 out·260k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
47%

Mercury 2.5 Preview uses 4.3x more transitions

GLM 4 32B
Mercury 2.5 Preview
55%Vocabulary65%
15wSentence Length14w
0.74Hedging0.44
4.9Bold4.9
3.8Lists3.3
0.00Emoji0.00
0.35Headings0.79
0.04Transitions0.20
Based on 27 + 26 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GLM 4 32B logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
GLM 4 32B vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Mercury 2.5 Preview logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Mercury 2.5 Preview vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
GLM 4 32B logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
GLM 4 32B vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Mercury 2.5 Preview logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
GLM 4 32B logoHy4 Preview logo
GLM 4 32B vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Mercury 2.5 Preview logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 4 32B logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
GLM 4 32B vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Mercury 2.5 Preview logoGranite 4.2 8B logo
Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Granite 4.2 8BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GLM 4 32B logoGLM 5.2 logo
GLM 4 32B vs GLM 5.2Same lab
GLM 4 32B logoGLM 5 logo
GLM 4 32B vs GLM 5Same lab
Mercury 2.5 Preview logoMercury logo
Mercury 2.5 Preview vs MercurySame lab
Mercury 2.5 Preview logoMercury 2 logo
Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Mercury 2Same lab
GLM 4 32B logoNemotron 3.5 Lightning logo
GLM 4 32B vs Nemotron 3.5 LightningNew provider
Mercury 2.5 Preview logoNVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 logo
Mercury 2.5 Preview vs NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2Same size
GLM 4 32B logoNorth Mini Code logo
GLM 4 32B vs North Mini CodeNew provider
Mercury 2.5 Preview logoAmazon Nova 2 Lite logo
Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Amazon Nova 2 LiteSame size

Model pages

GLM 4 32B logo
GLM 4 32B58 outputs, specs and price
Mercury 2.5 Preview logo
Mercury 2.5 Preview58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed