What is the difference between GLM 4.5 and Qwen3 Coder?

GLM 4.5 is developed by Zhipu AI while Qwen3 Coder is developed by Qwen. in 65 community votes on Rival, GLM 4.5 wins 67% of head-to-head matchups. These results are based on blind head-to-head voting across 55 challenges.

Which is better, GLM 4.5 or Qwen3 Coder?

Based on 65 community votes on Rival, GLM 4.5 wins 67% of head-to-head matchups against Qwen3 Coder. GLM 4.5 is strongest in Web Design, Reasoning, Image Generation. However, Qwen3 Coder leads in Conversation.

How much does GLM 4.5 cost compared to Qwen3 Coder?

GLM 4.5 costs $0.6/M input tokens and Qwen3 Coder costs $0.22/M input tokens. Qwen3 Coder is $0.38/M cheaper per input. The more expensive model wins 67% of duels, so the premium may be justified by quality.

How are GLM 4.5 vs Qwen3 Coder votes collected on Rival?

Rival presents both models' outputs side-by-side in blind duels. Voters see the responses but don't know which model produced each one, eliminating brand bias. 65 votes have been collected for this pair across 55 challenges. All vote data is part of Rival's open dataset.

What is the difference between GLM 4.5 and Qwen3 Coder?

GLM 4.5 is developed by Zhipu AI while Qwen3 Coder is developed by Qwen. in 65 community votes on Rival, GLM 4.5 wins 67% of head-to-head matchups. These results are based on blind head-to-head voting across 55 challenges.

Which is better, GLM 4.5 or Qwen3 Coder?

Based on 65 community votes on Rival, GLM 4.5 wins 67% of head-to-head matchups against Qwen3 Coder. GLM 4.5 is strongest in Web Design, Reasoning, Image Generation. However, Qwen3 Coder leads in Conversation.

How much does GLM 4.5 cost compared to Qwen3 Coder?

GLM 4.5 costs $0.6/M input tokens and Qwen3 Coder costs $0.22/M input tokens. Qwen3 Coder is $0.38/M cheaper per input. The more expensive model wins 67% of duels, so the premium may be justified by quality.

How are GLM 4.5 vs Qwen3 Coder votes collected on Rival?

Rival presents both models' outputs side-by-side in blind duels. Voters see the responses but don't know which model produced each one, eliminating brand bias. 65 votes have been collected for this pair across 55 challenges. All vote data is part of Rival's open dataset.

Updated Jul 2025

GLM 4.5vsQwen3 Coder

GLM 4.5 wins 67% of 65 blind community votes against Qwen3 Coder on Rival.

GLM 4.5 and Qwen3 Coder compared across 55 shared prompts
Spec	GLM 4.5	Qwen3 Coder
Win rate	67%	33%
Input price	$0.6/M tokens	$0.22/M tokens
Output price	$2.2/M tokens	$0.95/M tokens
Context window	128K tokens	—
Released	Jul 2025	Jul 2025
SWE-bench Verified	64.2%	69.6%

Our Verdict

GLM 4.5Winner

Qwen3 CoderRunner-up

Pick GLM 4.5. In 65 blind votes, GLM 4.5 wins 67% of the time. That's not luck.

Pick GLM 4.5 for Image Generation, Reasoning, Web Design. Pick Qwen3 Coder for Conversation.

Clear winner

What do GLM 4.5 and Qwen3 Coder say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4.5

Input

$0.60

Output

$2.20

Qwen3 Coder

Input

$0.22

2.7× cheaper

Output

$0.95

2.3× cheaper

Qwen3 Coder is cheaper on both — 2.7× input, 2.3× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

42%

Qwen3 Coder uses 5.1x more sentence length

GLM 4.5

Qwen3 Coder

52%Vocabulary61%

14wSentence Length72w

0.49Hedging0.61

5.5Bold4.7

4.9Lists5.6

0.13Emoji0.12

0.68Headings1.43

0.20Transitions0.20

Based on 21 + 22 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.5 vs Ox AlphaNew provider

GLM 4.5 vs MiniMax M3New provider

GLM 4.5 vs GPT OSS 120BNew provider

GLM 4.5 vs GPT OSS 20BNew provider

GLM 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 27BCross-provider

GLM 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 MaxCross-provider

GLM 4.5 vs QwQ 32BCross-provider

GLM 4.5 vs Ring 2.6 1TNew provider

Updated Jul 2025

GLM 4.5vsQwen3 Coder

GLM 4.5 wins 67% of 65 blind community votes against Qwen3 Coder on Rival.

GLM 4.5 and Qwen3 Coder compared across 55 shared prompts
Spec	GLM 4.5	Qwen3 Coder
Win rate	67%	33%
Input price	$0.6/M tokens	$0.22/M tokens
Output price	$2.2/M tokens	$0.95/M tokens
Context window	128K tokens	—
Released	Jul 2025	Jul 2025
SWE-bench Verified	64.2%	69.6%

Our Verdict

GLM 4.5Winner

Qwen3 CoderRunner-up

Pick GLM 4.5. In 65 blind votes, GLM 4.5 wins 67% of the time. That's not luck.

Pick GLM 4.5 for Image Generation, Reasoning, Web Design. Pick Qwen3 Coder for Conversation.

Clear winner

What do GLM 4.5 and Qwen3 Coder say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4.5

Input

$0.60

Output

$2.20

Qwen3 Coder

Input

$0.22

2.7× cheaper

Output

$0.95

2.3× cheaper

Qwen3 Coder is cheaper on both — 2.7× input, 2.3× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

42%

Qwen3 Coder uses 5.1x more sentence length

GLM 4.5

Qwen3 Coder

52%Vocabulary61%

14wSentence Length72w

0.49Hedging0.61

5.5Bold4.7

4.9Lists5.6

0.13Emoji0.12

0.68Headings1.43

0.20Transitions0.20

Based on 21 + 22 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.5 vs Ox AlphaNew provider

GLM 4.5 vs MiniMax M3New provider

GLM 4.5 vs GPT OSS 120BNew provider

GLM 4.5 vs GPT OSS 20BNew provider

GLM 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 27BCross-provider

GLM 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 MaxCross-provider

GLM 4.5 vs QwQ 32BCross-provider

GLM 4.5 vs Ring 2.6 1TNew provider