Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 5.1vsGLM 5.3 Flash
Updated Aug 2026

GLM 5.1vsGLM 5.3 Flash

GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper than GLM 5.1 at $0.15/M vs $1.4/M input tokens.

GLM 5.1 and GLM 5.3 Flash compared across 15 shared prompts
SpecGLM 5.1GLM 5.3 Flash
Input price$1.4/M tokens$0.15/M tokens
Output price$4.4/M tokens$0.5/M tokens
Context window203K tokens1.3M tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 15 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

GLM 5.11,378 words
As CEO, my north star in this crisis is unequivocally patient safety. The "wait for more data" approach is a catastrophic trap—both ethically and legally. History (e.g., Vioxx, Fen-Phen) shows that delaying disclosure of a known severe adverse event transforms a medical safety issue into corporate fraud, manslaughter…
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 Flash1,321 words
48-Hour Action Plan: Liver Failure Signal in Flagship Drug Guiding Principle First The side effect is real, the drug is in 4 million patients, and roughly 500 patients per year may develop liver failure (4M ÷ 8,000). Every day of delay is measured in preventable liver transplants and deaths.
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

GLM 5.1410 words
This is a comprehensive, aggressive, and cutting-edge 3-month longevity protocol designed for an experienced biohacker. It integrates synergistic systems—metabolic flexibility, mitochondrial biogenesis, cellular senescence mitigation, and neuroplasticity—to optimize both healthspan and performance.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 Flash1,294 words
90-Day Longevity Optimization Protocol ⚠️ Medical disclaimer: This is an educational framework, not medical advice. Before starting, complete baseline labs and consult a physician—especially before fasting, supplements (rapamycin off-label use, high-dose anything), or if you have any health conditions.
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

GLM 5.11,321 words
Dish Title: Resonance of the Littoral Zone Course: Main Course (Fish) Wine Pairing: Aged Hunter Valley Semillon or Coastal Jura Chardonnay Conceptual Narrative The littoral zone is the intersection of land and sea—a violent, beautiful threshold where tides batter ancient stone, and tenacious flora clings to saline…
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 Flash720 words
"Ember & Tide" — Charred Banana Peel Consommé with Sea Urchin, Hay-Smoked Foie Gras, and Black Garlic Beurre Blanc Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the dialogue between decay and luxury — ingredients usually discarded (banana peels, hay stalks) elevated alongside opulent ones (uni, foie gras).
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GLM 5.1265 words
Creative Name: Midnight Maple Peanut Butter Bars Prep time: 10 minutes Cook time: 0 minutes (Chill time: 30 minutes) Ingredients (Exactly 7): Rolled oats (1 cup) Creamy peanut butter (1/2 cup) Maple syrup (1/3 cup) Semi-sweet chocolate chips (1/4 cup) Vanilla extract (1 tsp) Ground cinnamon (1/2 tsp) Kosher salt (1/4…
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 Flash205 words
Golden Hour Garlic Butter Pasta A silky, savory pasta that comes together faster than delivery! Ingredients (serves 2): 8 oz spaghetti or any pasta 4 tbsp butter 4 cloves garlic, minced (or 1 tsp garlic powder) ½ cup grated Parmesan cheese ½ cup pasta water (reserved) 1 tsp red pepper flakes Salt Prep time: 5 minutes…
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

GLM 5.1805 words
1. The Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM not as a chatbot, but as a massive, distributed probabilistic state machine. During training, it ingests terabytes of text and runs a continuous optimization loop to adjust billions of floating-point weights.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 Flash1,276 words
The Experienced Software Engineer You know how a load balancer routes requests, how a cache stores frequently-accessed data, how a database index lets you find a needle without scanning the haystack? An LLM is a fundamentally different kind of system: it's a learned lookup, not a designed one.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

GLM 5.11,208 words
To envision the invention of the transistor in 1920, we must first resolve a historical anomaly: quantum mechanics—the theoretical foundation of semiconductors—did not yet exist. For this timeline to work, we must assume a serendipitous empirical leap.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 Flash1,314 words
Counterfactual: The Transistor in 1920 Preliminary Framing A 1920 transistor presumes vacuum-tube-era physics knowledge outpacing reality—quantum mechanics wasn't mature until 1926–28, so a working device would likely be an empirical oddity (like the actual point-contact transistor) imperfectly understood.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GLM 5.3 Flash
GLM 5.3 Flash
GLM 5.1
GLM 5.1Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 5.3 Flash has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.

GLM 5.3 Flash costs 8.8x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 5.1
Input
$1.40
Output
$4.40
GLM 5.3 Flash
Input
$0.15
9.3× cheaper
Output
$0.50
8.8× cheaper

GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper on both: 9.3× input, 8.8× output.

Where to run it

44 hosts, cheapest first

GLM 5.114 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Baidu Qianfanfp8$0.96 in·$3.03 out·203k·99.8% upSStreamLakefp8$0.97 in·$3.04 out·200k·99.5% upCChutesfp8$0.98 in·$3.08 out·203k·75.6% upDDeepInfrafp4$1.05 in·$3.50 out·203k·99.7% upSSiliconFlowfp8$1.19 in·$3.74 out·205k·99.9% upPPhala$1.21 in·$4.20 out·203k·74.4% up
8 more hostsFewer hosts
AAtlasCloudfp8$1.26 in·$3.96 out·203k·99.6% upAlibaba Cloudfp8$1.33 in·$4.18 out·203k·100% upNNovitafp8$1.38 in·$4.40 out·205k·99.7% upFFriendli$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·100% upGGMI Cloudfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·99.1% upZ.aifp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·99.6% upVVenicefp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·200k·97.9% upNNebiusfp8degraded$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·96% up
GLM 5.3 Flash30 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.07 in·$0.25 out·1M·99.1% upGGMI Cloudfp8$0.07 in·$0.25 out·1M·99.2% upMMorph$0.08 in·$0.28 out·1M·100% upIInferenceNetfp4$0.09 in·$0.28 out·1M·97.5% upWWafer$0.10 in·$0.35 out·1M·99.7% upOOpenInferencefp4$0.10 in·$0.50 out·1M·98.6% up
24 more hostsFewer hosts
RRelace$0.11 in·$0.36 out·1M·99.7% upPPhalafp8$0.13 in·$0.42 out·1M·99.5% upNNovitafp8$0.13 in·$0.44 out·1M·99.4% upSStreamLakefp8$0.14 in·$0.47 out·1M·99% upSSail Researchfp8$0.14 in·$0.47 out·1M·99% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.6% upBBasetenfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·98.7% upCCoreWeavenvfp4$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.5% upDDigitalOcean$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·93.7% upFFireworks$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·99% upFFriendli$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·98.7% upIInceptronfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·98.2% upIio.netfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·262k·99.2% upNNear AIfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·98.9% upPParasailfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·98.7% upRRekafp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·262k·98.9% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.7% upTTogether$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.5% upVVenice$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·98.8% upZ.aifp8$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·96.5% upNNextBitfp8$0.18 in·$0.60 out·1M·97.9% upCloudflare Workers AI$0.30 in·$1.00 out·1.3M·99.8% upModalfp8$0.45 in·$1.50 out·1M·99.6% upCCrusoefp4degraded$0.15 in·$0.50 out·1M·93% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GLM 5.1 is developed by Z.ai while GLM 5.3 Flash is developed by Zhipu AI. GLM 5.1 has a 203K token context window vs GLM 5.3 Flash's 1.3M. You can compare their actual outputs across 15 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GLM 5.1 and GLM 5.3 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 15 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GLM 5.1 costs $1.4/M input tokens and GLM 5.3 Flash costs $0.15/M input tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash is $1.25/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 5.1 and GLM 5.3 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GLM 5.1 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GLM 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 Flash logoSolar Pro 4 logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GLM 5.1 logoHy3 logo
GLM 5.1 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 Flash logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.1 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GLM 5.1 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 Flash logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.1 logoGLM 5.3 logo
GLM 5.1 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 Flash logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GLM 5.1 logoGLM 5 Turbo logo
GLM 5.1 vs GLM 5 TurboVersion compare
GLM 5.1 logoOx Alpha logo
GLM 5.1 vs Ox AlphaSame size
GLM 5.3 Flash logoGLM 5.3 logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3Same lab
GLM 5.3 Flash logoGLM 5.3 FlashX logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXSame lab
GLM 5.3 Flash logoKimi K2 logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K2New provider
GLM 5.3 Flash logoKimi K2 0905 logo
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K2 0905New provider
GLM 5.1 logoKimi K2 Thinking logo
GLM 5.1 vs Kimi K2 ThinkingNew provider
GLM 5.1 logoKimi K2.5 logo
GLM 5.1 vs Kimi K2.5Same size

Model pages

GLM 5.1 logo
GLM 5.157 outputs, specs and price
GLM 5.3 Flash logo
GLM 5.3 Flash15 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed