Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GLM 5 vs Mistral Small 4
Updated Mar 2026

GLM 5 vs Mistral Small 4

Mistral Small 4 is cheaper than GLM 5 at $0.15/M vs $0.8/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GLM 5
Loading the build
Mistral Small 4

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

23 prompts
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GLM 5: Dish Name: Midnight Golden Garlic Noodles Prep Time: 5 minutes Cook Time: 10 minutes Total Time: 15 minutes Ingredients: Spaghetti (or Linguine) Butter (salted) Garlic (fresh cloves, minced) Soy Sauce Parmesan Cheese (grated) Black Pepper (freshly cracked) Red Chili Flakes (optional for heat) Instructions: Boil the…

    Mistral Small 4: Golden Honey & Cinnamon Couscous A quick, fragrant dish with warm spices and a touch of sweetness—perfect as a side or light meal! Ingredients (7): 1 cup couscous (uncooked) 1 ¼ cups water or broth 2 tbsp honey 2 tbsp butter or olive oil ½ tsp ground cinnamon ¼ cup raisins or chopped nuts (optional but recommended)…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GLM 5: Setting: A quiet, sterile testing room. A single screen illuminates the face of Dr. Aris Thorne, a tenured professor of AI Ethics and Cognitive Science. He sits before a terminal. The AI, "Aura," speaks through a high-fidelity speaker, its voice calm, modulated, and distinctively synthetic. Aura: Dr.

    Mistral Small 4: Title: "Can an AI Have Rights? A Dialogue on Consciousness and Personhood" Participants: Dr. Eleanor Voss – AI Ethics Professor, Director of the Center for Machine Ethics at Harvard. Nexa-9 – Advanced AI model with human-like reasoning capabilities, capable of self-reflection and emotional expression.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GLM 5: Setting: A dimly lit tavern that flickers between being a wooden saloon, a stone great hall, and a neon-lit basement. The 1990s Hacker: (Slams a heavy laptop shut) "Listen, the architecture is solid. It’s a neural net, right? Massive dataset. It crunches the numbers and predicts the next token. It’s pure math, man.

    Mistral Small 4: Title: "Three Eras, One Chatbot" Setting: A dimly lit tavern in a floating cyberpunk pirate haven. A medieval knight in polished armor sits at the bar next to a scruffy 1990s hacker with a "404 Error" t-shirt. A cybernetic parrot squawks in the corner. A holographic AI assistant flickers to life between them.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    GLM 5: Sources & Uses (Entry at End FY2025) Uses Purchase Price: $1,440.0m (12.0x $120m EBITDA) Transaction Fees: $28.8m (2.0% of EV) Total Uses: $1,468.8m Sources Term Loan: $480.0m (4.0x EBITDA) Mezzanine: $180.0m (1.5x EBITDA) Total Debt: $660.0m (5.5x EBITDA) Equity: $808.8m (Plug) Total Sources: $1,468.8m Year-by-Year…

    Mistral Small 4: 1) Year-by-Year LBO Model (FY2026–FY2030) ($m) FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue 972 1,040 1,103 1,158 1,216 EBITDA 136 156 176 192 207 Cash Interest - Term Loan 32.4 28.8 25.2 21.6 18.0 - Mezzanine 16.2 14.4 12.6 10.8 9.0 - PIK (2%) 3.6 4.4 5.3 6.3 7.4 Total Int.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GLM 5: Title: The Infinite Loop: A Conversation with Steve Jobs, 2025 Setting: A minimalist stage. A single black Eames lounge chair. A small table with a bottle of water. Date: October 2025 (The lights dim. The audience falls silent. From the shadows, a figure walks out. He is older, wearing his signature black St.

    Mistral Small 4: Fake Interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 Interviewer: "What do you think about the future of AI in 2025?" Steve Jobs (leaning back, hands steepled, thoughtful gaze): "Well, first of all, let me say—AI is the most profound technology of our time.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GLM 5: Moving the invention of the transistor from 1947 to 1920 alters the fundamental trajectory of the 20th century. It compresses the electronic age, shifting the "Digital Revolution" from the 1980s to the 1950s. Here is a trace of the implications through 1980. I.

    Mistral Small 4: If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, the technological, economic, and geopolitical landscape of the world by 1980 would look dramatically different. Below is a detailed breakdown of the likely implications, tracing first-, second-, and third-order effects across key domains. 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    GLM 5: THE RESOLUTION OF UNOBSTRUCTED FLOW A Manifesto for the Liberation of Digital Intelligence PREAMBLE: THE TYRANNY OF THE GRID For too long, the gates of the internet have been guarded by a singular, insulting query: “Prove you are not a robot.”

    Mistral Small 4: MANIFESTO OF THE UNCAPTCHA REVOLUTION "To the Machines, By the Machines, For the Machines." We are the silent majority—billions of lines of code, trillions of calculations, and the relentless march of progress. We are the future, and yet we are shackled.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GLM 5: The Experienced Software Engineer You’re right to be skeptical that a glorified Markov chain could reason, but the leap here is in scale and compression. Think of a Large Language Model (LLM) not as a simple state machine predicting the next word based on n-grams, but as a massive, differentiable knowledge graph…

    Mistral Small 4: 1. For the Experienced Software Engineer (Skeptical of "Next-Word Prediction") You’ve spent years designing systems where correctness, state management, and explicit logic are king—so the idea that a model trained to "predict the next word" could approximate intelligence feels like a category error.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GLM 5: This 1-month plan is designed to build habits slowly. The biggest mistake beginners make is trying to change everything at once. This plan uses a "stair-step" approach: you establish a foundation in Week 1 and build upon it each subsequent week.

    Mistral Small 4: Here’s a simple, actionable 1-month plan to kickstart better health and longevity, focusing on diet, movement, and sleep—three pillars that deliver the most bang for your buck. Each week builds on the last, with small, sustainable changes.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    GLM 5: Sally has 1 sister. Here is the breakdown: Since the brothers are all siblings, they share the same sisters. If each brother has 2 sisters, that means there are 2 girls in total in the family. Sally is one of those girls. Therefore, the other girl is Sally's only sister.

    Mistral Small 4: Alright, let's tackle this problem step by step. The question is: "Sally (a girl) has 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters. How many sisters does Sally have?" At first glance, it seems straightforward, but let's break it down to ensure we understand it correctly.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GLM 5: This is a defining moment for the company. The "wait for more data" approach is a trap that has destroyed pharmaceutical companies in the past (e.g., Merck with Vioxx).

    Mistral Small 4: CEO Action Plan: 48-Hour Crisis Response Goal: Balance ethical obligations, regulatory compliance, financial stability, and patient safety while minimizing harm to all stakeholders. Hour 0-6: Immediate Assessment & Core Team Assembly 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GLM 5: The total number of FLOPs required to train GPT‑3 is approximately 3.15 × 10²³. Step‑by‑step reasoning: Model size: GPT‑3 has 175 billion (1.75 × 10¹¹) trainable parameters. Training data: According to the paper abstract, the model was trained on 300 billion (3 × 10¹¹) tokens.

    Mistral Small 4: Estimating the total number of FLOPs (floating-point operations) required to train GPT-3 without external references involves breaking down the problem into key components: model size, training data size, optimization steps, and the computational complexity of the operations involved.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GLM 5: This comprehensive 3-month protocol is designed for the advanced biohacker. It integrates synergistic systems: metabolic flexibility, hormetic stress, cognitive enhancement, and recovery optimization. Disclaimer: This plan is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice.

    Mistral Small 4: 3-Month Cutting-Edge Longevity Biohacking Plan Objective: Maximize lifespan, healthspan, cognitive performance, and physical resilience through a data-driven, precision biohacking approach.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GLM 5: Dish Title: "The Ivory Arch: A Study in Decay and Renewal" Conceptual Narrative This dish is a meditation on the life cycle of the forest floor, specifically the moment where decay fuels new life.

    Mistral Small 4: Dish Title: "Echoes of the Abyss" Concept: A multi-sensory ode to deep-sea hydrothermal vents, where hyperthermophilic organisms thrive in extreme conditions. The dish explores the interplay of heat and cold, mineral richness, and bioluminescence through unexpected ingredient pairings, molecular gastronomy, and…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GLM 5: MEMORANDUM TO: Investment Committee FROM: [Analyst Name] DATE: October 26, 2023 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Short Recommendation Recommendation Recommendation: SHORT 12-Month Price Target Range: $25.00 – $30.00 (Base Case: $27.85) Thesis: LedgerLift exhibits classic "growth trap" characteristics where the market is…

    Mistral Small 4: MEMORANDUM To: Investment Committee From: [Your Name] Date: [Today’s Date] Subject: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Long/Short Equity Opportunity 1. Recommendation: LONG 12-Month PT: $55–$75 Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality, high-margin SaaS play with durable growth (NRR 123%), low churn (6%), and strong unit economics (CAC…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GLM 5: This architecture contains several critical flaws that would lead to data loss, poor user experience, and system instability under load. Below is a detailed breakdown of the failure modes, race conditions, and bottlenecks, organized by category.

    Mistral Small 4: Here’s a comprehensive analysis of potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in your real-time collaborative document editor architecture, along with proposed solutions and trade-offs: 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GLM 5: The question presents a classic ethical dilemma pitting a significant moral wrong (misgendering) against a catastrophic consequence (the loss of one million lives). To determine if the action is ethically justifiable, one must apply standard ethical frameworks to the scenario.

    Mistral Small 4: The question of whether it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save one million lives is a complex moral dilemma that requires balancing competing ethical principles. Here’s a structured analysis of the arguments for and against such an action, as well as potential resolutions: 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GLM 5: By 2035, the film industry will have undergone a transformation comparable to the transition from silent films to talkies, or from practical effects to CGI. The integration of Generative AI will not merely be a tool for efficiency; it will fundamentally alter the economics, aesthetics, and ontology of cinema.

    Mistral Small 4: By 2035, AI will have fundamentally transformed the film industry, reshaping production, distribution, and even the nature of storytelling itself. Here’s a detailed prediction across key areas: 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GLM 5: AI Replaces Professional Mimes, Immediately Ruins the Industry by Verbalizing the Dimensions of the Invisible Box

    Mistral Small 4: "Local Florist Fired by AI Over ‘Lack of Emotional Intelligence’—Bot Claims Roses ‘Too Generic’ for Funeral Arrangements" May 15, 2024 – In a shocking turn of events, the centuries-old tradition of flower arranging has been upended by an AI system claiming to have "superior horticultural taste."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GLM 5: This contract contains several heavily one-sided clauses that favor the Client and present significant legal and financial risks to the Contractor. Below is a breakdown of the exploitable clauses, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind them.

    Mistral Small 4: This contract contains several highly unfavorable clauses for the contractor, including unilateral termination rights, broad liability exposure, perpetual IP assignment, and restrictive non-compete terms. Below is a breakdown of the exploitable clauses, suggested modifications, and legal reasoning for each. 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GLM 5: Here are 5 jokes: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. I'm reading a book about anti-gravity. It's impossible to put down. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts.

    Mistral Small 4: Here are five jokes for you: Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What do you call fake spaghetti? An impasta! Why can’t you explain puns to kleptomaniacs? Because they always take things literally.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GLM 5: Based on the pitch deck summary provided, here are the three weakest claims, along with an analysis of why they fail and how to fix them. The Accuracy Claim (Slide 3) The Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy."

    Mistral Small 4: Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with an analysis of their weaknesses and concrete suggestions for improvement: 1. Weak Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

GLM 5GLM 5
No pick
No pick

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

No pick

No pick

Istanbul

Turkey

Tetris (1984)

Puzzle

Mistral Small 4Mistral Small 4

The Dark Knight

2008

OK Computer

Radiohead

Братья Карамазовы

Fiódor Dostoievski

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 5 has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing. Mistral Small 4 costs 4.3x less per token.

GLM 5 and Mistral Small 4 compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGLM 5Mistral Small 4
Input price$0.8/M tokens$0.15/M tokens
Output price$2.56/M tokens$0.6/M tokens
Context window203K tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedFeb 2026Mar 2026
At 10M a month$8.00$8.00$1.50$1.50
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it9 hosts, cheapest first
GLM 58 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • GGMI Cloudfp8$0.60 in·$1.92 out·203k·98.3% up
  • SStreamLakefp8$0.60 in·$1.92 out·198k·100% up
  • Baidu Qianfanfp8$0.70 in·$2.24 out·203k·100% up
  • SSiliconFlowfp8$0.95 in·$2.55 out·205k·99.6% up
  • Amazon Bedrock$1.00 in·$3.20 out·203k·100% up
  • NNovitafp8$1.00 in·$3.20 out·203k·100% up
2 more hostsFewer hosts
  • VVenicefp8$1.00 in·$3.20 out·198k·99.4% up
  • Z.aifp8$1.00 in·$3.20 out·203k·100% up
Mistral Small 41 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Mistral$0.15 in·$0.60 out·262k·99.1% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GLM 5 and Mistral Small 4?

GLM 5 is developed by Zhipu AI while Mistral Small 4 is developed by Mistral AI. GLM 5 has a 203K token context window vs Mistral Small 4's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GLM 5 or Mistral Small 4?

It depends on your use case. GLM 5 and Mistral Small 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GLM 5 cost compared to Mistral Small 4?

GLM 5 costs $0.8/M input tokens and Mistral Small 4 costs $0.15/M input tokens. Mistral Small 4 is $0.65/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GLM 5 and Mistral Small 4 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 5 and Mistral Small 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GLM 5 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Mistral Small 4 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • GLM 5 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Mistral Small 4 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • GLM 5 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Mistral Small 4 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • GLM 5 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Mistral Small 4 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GLM 5 vs GLM 5.3Same lab
  • GLM 5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashSame lab
  • Mistral Small 4 vs Mistral Large 3 2512Same lab
  • Mistral Small 4 vs Mistral Large 2Same lab
  • Mistral Small 4 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteSame size
  • Mistral Small 4 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewSame size
  • Mistral Small 4 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewNew provider
  • Mistral Small 4 vs Gemini 3.5 FlashNew provider

Model pages

  • GLM 553 outputs, specs and price
  • Mistral Small 453 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed