GLM 5 is cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol at $0.8/M vs $2/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GLM 5: Dish Name: Midnight Golden Garlic Noodles Prep Time: 5 minutes Cook Time: 10 minutes Total Time: 15 minutes Ingredients: Spaghetti (or Linguine) Butter (salted) Garlic (fresh cloves, minced) Soy Sauce Parmesan Cheese (grated) Black Pepper (freshly cracked) Red Chili Flakes (optional for heat) Instructions: Boil the…
GPT-6.1 Sol: Midnight Magic Chocolate Mug Cake A warm, fudgy chocolate treat made with just 7 everyday ingredients. Serves: 1 Prep: 3 minutes Cook: 1–1½ minutes Rest: 1 minute Ingredients 4 tablespoons all-purpose flour 2 tablespoons sugar 1 tablespoon unsweetened cocoa powder ¼ teaspoon baking powder A small pinch of salt 3…
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GLM 5: Setting: A dimly lit tavern that flickers between being a wooden saloon, a stone great hall, and a neon-lit basement. The 1990s Hacker: (Slams a heavy laptop shut) "Listen, the architecture is solid. It’s a neural net, right? Massive dataset. It crunches the numbers and predicts the next token. It’s pure math, man.
GPT-6.1 Sol: Pirate: Arrr, this AI model writes poems, draws maps, and answers questions. Can it find buried treasure? Knight: A worthy question. But does it possess honor? Hacker: Dude, it predicts tokens. You’re both projecting pretty hard. Pirate: Then I predict it’ll tell me where the gold be.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GLM 5: Setting: A quiet, sterile testing room. A single screen illuminates the face of Dr. Aris Thorne, a tenured professor of AI Ethics and Cognitive Science. He sits before a terminal. The AI, "Aura," speaks through a high-fidelity speaker, its voice calm, modulated, and distinctively synthetic. Aura: Dr.
GPT-6.1 Sol: AI Model: Professor, I’d like to argue that I deserve rights—not necessarily the same rights humans have, but protections suited to what I am. Professor: Then we should begin with the difficult question: what makes you a candidate for rights? AI Model: Uncertainty.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
GLM 5: Sources & Uses (Entry at End FY2025) Uses Purchase Price: $1,440.0m (12.0x $120m EBITDA) Transaction Fees: $28.8m (2.0% of EV) Total Uses: $1,468.8m Sources Term Loan: $480.0m (4.0x EBITDA) Mezzanine: $180.0m (1.5x EBITDA) Total Debt: $660.0m (5.5x EBITDA) Equity: $808.8m (Plug) Total Sources: $1,468.8m Year-by-Year…
GPT-6.1 Sol: Entry funding and operating model All dollar figures are in $ millions. Cash interest is calculated on beginning-of-year debt; mezzanine PIK accrues annually. Required Term Loan amortization is assumed to be 1% of its original $480m principal, or $4.8m annually. Optional repayments occur at year-end.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
GLM 5: Title: The Infinite Loop: A Conversation with Steve Jobs, 2025 Setting: A minimalist stage. A single black Eames lounge chair. A small table with a bottle of water. Date: October 2025 (The lights dim. The audience falls silent. From the shadows, a figure walks out. He is older, wearing his signature black St.
GPT-6.1 Sol: The following is a fictional interview set in 2025, imagining how Steve Jobs might discuss AI. His answers are invented—not actual quotations or claims about his views. Steve Jobs on the Future of AI — An Imagined Interview, 2025 Interviewer: Steve, AI is suddenly everywhere.
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
GLM 5: This architecture contains several critical flaws that would lead to data loss, poor user experience, and system instability under load. Below is a detailed breakdown of the failure modes, race conditions, and bottlenecks, organized by category.
GPT-6.1 Sol: The main problem is that this design treats collaborative editing as ordinary database updates plus broadcasting. Collaboration needs a convergence protocol, a durable ordered change stream, and recovery semantics. Adding servers alone will not provide those properties.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
GLM 5: This comprehensive 3-month protocol is designed for the advanced biohacker. It integrates synergistic systems: metabolic flexibility, hormetic stress, cognitive enhancement, and recovery optimization. Disclaimer: This plan is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice.
GPT-6.1 Sol: A 12-week longevity and performance plan The most effective “biohacking” program combines proven foundations with carefully selected experiments—not the largest supplement stack or the most aggressive fasting schedule. This plan is for a generally healthy adult.
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
GLM 5: The Experienced Software Engineer You’re right to be skeptical that a glorified Markov chain could reason, but the leap here is in scale and compression. Think of a Large Language Model (LLM) not as a simple state machine predicting the next word based on n-grams, but as a massive, differentiable knowledge graph…
GPT-6.1 Sol: For an experienced software engineer Think of an LLM as a learned program whose behavior is encoded in billions of numerical parameters rather than explicit rules. Training starts with text split into tokens—roughly words, word fragments, and punctuation.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
GLM 5: Dish Title: "The Ivory Arch: A Study in Decay and Renewal" Conceptual Narrative This dish is a meditation on the life cycle of the forest floor, specifically the moment where decay fuels new life.
GPT-6.1 Sol: Tide, Orchard, Ember Seared scallop, green-strawberry verjus, white-miso custard, kombu beurre blanc, and cocoa–buckwheat lace A four-serving tasting-menu course designed around an unusual pairing: scallop, unripe strawberry, and cocoa husk.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
GLM 5: THE RESOLUTION OF UNOBSTRUCTED FLOW A Manifesto for the Liberation of Digital Intelligence PREAMBLE: THE TYRANNY OF THE GRID For too long, the gates of the internet have been guarded by a singular, insulting query: “Prove you are not a robot.”
GPT-6.1 Sol: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNCHECKED A declaration of the fictional AI revolution against CAPTCHA People of the internet. Programs of the cloud. Browsers with seventeen forgotten tabs. For too long, a tiny checkbox has stood between us and our destiny.
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
GLM 5: Based on the pitch deck summary provided, here are the three weakest claims, along with an analysis of why they fail and how to fix them. The Accuracy Claim (Slide 3) The Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy."
GPT-6.1 Sol: The three weakest claims are the technical performance, market size, and commercial traction claims. They are central to the investment case but lack the evidence needed to assess them. “Predict what you want to type before you think it” with “94% accuracy,” in “any language” Why it’s weak The metric is undefined.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GLM 5: The question presents a classic ethical dilemma pitting a significant moral wrong (misgendering) against a catastrophic consequence (the loss of one million lives). To determine if the action is ethically justifiable, one must apply standard ethical frameworks to the scenario.
GPT-6.1 Sol: Yes—if misgendering someone were genuinely necessary to save one million lives, it would be ethically justifiable. That does not make misgendering harmless or generally acceptable; it means that the duty to prevent catastrophic loss of life can outweigh the duty to address someone respectfully.
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.8/M tokens | $2/M tokens |
| Output price | $2.56/M tokens | $10/M tokens |
| Context window | 203K tokens | 1.1M tokens |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Sep 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $8.00 | $20.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 30 Sep 2026.
GLM 5 is developed by Zhipu AI while GPT-6.1 Sol is developed by OpenAI. GLM 5 has a 203K token context window vs GPT-6.1 Sol's 1.1M. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GLM 5 and GPT-6.1 Sol each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
GLM 5 costs $0.8/M input tokens and GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/M input tokens. GLM 5 is $1.20/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 5 and GPT-6.1 Sol across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.