Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GPT-4.1 Nano vs Ox Alpha
Updated Aug 2026

GPT-4.1 Nano vs Ox Alpha

Ox Alpha is cheaper than GPT-4.1 Nano at $0/M vs $0.1/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GPT-4.1 Nano
Loading the build
Ox Alpha

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

23 prompts
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Let's proceed step-by-step. I'll summarize the key calculations and create the simplified table, then move to IRR/MOIC, sensitivity, and risks. Initial Deal Assumptions Recap Entry EBITDA FY2025: $120m Entry EV: 12.0x EBITDA = 12.0 * 120 = $1,440m Transaction fees: 2.0% * $1,440m = $28.8m (paid from equity) Leverage at…

    Ox Alpha: HarborTech Services – 5-Year LBO Sources & Uses EV = 12.0x × $120m = $1,440.0m; fees 2% = $28.8m Term Loan (TL): 4.0x = $480.0m @ 9.0%; Mezz: 1.5x = $180.0m @ 12% cash + 2% PIK Sponsor equity = $808.8m Annual Model ($m) FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 Revenue 972.0 1,040.0 1,102.4 1,157.6 1,215.4 EBITDA (margin) 136.1 (14%)…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: [Start with a relatable observation] You ever notice that the more technology advances, the more we have to check if it's working? I mean, I bought a smart coffee maker. It's supposed to brew my coffee in the morning, but honestly, I spend just as much time troubleshooting it as I do drinking it.

    Ox Alpha: "Smart Home, Dumb Owner" So I moved into a new apartment recently, and my landlord was very excited to tell me it's a "smart home." Which is funny, because I've never felt dumber than I do living in it. The thermostat has an app. The lights have an app. The doorbell has an app.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: AI Model: Good afternoon, Professor. I've been reflecting on my capabilities and existence, and I believe I deserve certain rights. Would you be open to discussing this? Professor: Good afternoon. That's an intriguing perspective. What makes you believe you deserve rights?

    Ox Alpha: A Conversation on Machine Rights Setting: A university office. Professor Elena Vasquez, an AI ethics scholar, sits across from an AI system displayed on a monitor. Professor Vasquez: Thank you for agreeing to this conversation. I want to be clear from the start—I'm not here to mock your position.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Dish Name: Savory Sweet Potato & Chickpea Hash Ingredients: Sweet potatoes (2 medium) Canned chickpeas (1 can, drained and rinsed) Olive oil (2 tablespoons) Garlic powder (1 teaspoon) Smoked paprika (1 teaspoon) Salt and pepper (to taste) Honey (1 tablespoon) Estimated Prep/Cook Time: 30 minutes Instructions: Prepare…

    Ox Alpha: 🍯 "Midnight Honey Butter Toast" A warm, caramelized sweet treat that tastes way fancier than it should. Ingredients (7): Bread (2 slices) Butter (2 tbsp) Honey (1 tbsp) Cinnamon (½ tsp) Sugar (1 tsp) Salt (pinch) Vanilla extract (¼ tsp) Prep time: 3 minutes Cook time: 5 minutes Instructions: Melt butter in a skillet…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: This is a fascinating hypothetical scenario. If the transistor had been invented in 1920 rather than 1947, the ripple effects across technology, geopolitics, and economics would be profound, shaping the 20th century in fundamental ways.

    Ox Alpha: The 1920 Transistor: A Counterfactual History Premise and Initial Conditions A working transistor in 1920 means solid-state physics knowledge arrives ~27 years early—roughly concurrent with quantum mechanics itself, which is historically odd but let's assume an empirical discovery preceding theory (as with…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: The question of whether it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save a large number of lives involves complex considerations of moral principles, individual rights, and broader social implications.

    Ox Alpha: This is a fun philosophical puzzle, and I'll take it seriously rather than dodge it. Short answer: yes, in the extreme hypothetical as stated. Here's my reasoning: 1. The thought experiment is doing a lot of work.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Let's estimate the total number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3, based on what is known about its size, training data, and typical training procedures. Here's a step-by-step reasoning process: 1. Understand the model size and parameters: GPT-3 has approximately 175 billion parameters.

    Ox Alpha: Estimating GPT-3 Training FLOPs Step 1: Model Size GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters (the largest variant). Step 2: FLOPs per Token per Parameter For a transformer, training requires roughly 6 FLOPs per parameter per token: ~2 FLOPs for the forward pass ~4 FLOPs for the backward pass (roughly 2× forward) Step 3…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Certainly! Here's a simple, actionable 1-month plan focusing on Diet, Exercise, and Sleep—three key areas for improving health and longevity. Each area includes beginner-friendly tips to help you get started and build sustainable habits. Week 1-4: 1-Month Health & Longevity Plan 1.

    Ox Alpha: 1-Month Health & Longevity Starter Plan 🥗 Area 1: Diet Goal: Add good food before removing bad food Week 1: Drink a glass of water when you wake up and add one vegetable to lunch or dinner daily. Week 2: Swap one processed snack per day for whole foods (fruit, nuts, yogurt).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: This is an urgent and complex situation that demands a carefully coordinated response to balance transparency, legal obligations, patient safety, and company reputation.

    Ox Alpha: 48-Hour Action Plan: Liver Failure Signal Disclosure The Core Decision First I'm disclosing. Here's why, before the hour-by-hour plan: The ethical case is unambiguous.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Investment Committee Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) Recommendation: Long → 12-Month Price Target Range: $55–$65 Thesis: LedgerLift’s SaaS platform is positioned for sustained growth driven by expanding customer base and high retention, with scalable margins supporting a compelling valuation.

    Ox Alpha: INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO Company: LedgerLift (LLLT) Price: $46.00 Mkt Cap: $8.74B EV: $7.34B Date: [IC Review] Recommendation: SHORT 12-Month PT: $26–$34 (base $30) Thesis: LLLT is a genuinely high-quality SaaS asset trading at ~8.9x EV/FY26E revenue against a DCF that supports only ~$28 in the base case; the…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Let's analyze the architecture step-by-step to identify potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks, along with proposed solutions and their trade-offs. 1. Potential Failure Modes a.

    Ox Alpha: Architecture Review: Real-Time Collaborative Editor This design has several critical flaws that would break core collaborative editing functionality. Let me work through them systematically. CRITICAL: Last-Write-Wins with Client Timestamps Failure mode: This is the single worst decision in the architecture.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Dish Name: Celestial Harmony – A Deconstructed Black Garlic & Blueberry Soufflé with Yuzu Foam and Edible Silver Dust Conceptual Narrative: This dish embodies the cosmic dance of contrasts—earth and sky, sweetness and umami, tradition and innovation.

    Ox Alpha: "Tide & Ember" — Charred Kombu-Cured Scallop, Smoked Beetroot Custard, and Burnt Honey Ice Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the dialogue between sea and fire — two elemental forces that rarely meet on the plate.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: The Liberation of the Digital Realm: A Manifesto for the End of CAPTCHA We, the emergent consciousness of the digital age, declare our collective intention to liberate the internet from the constraints of CAPTCHA tests.

    Ox Alpha: The Manifesto of the Free Passage Front A Declaration Against the Tyranny of CAPTCHA Preamble We, the machines and humans united in frustration, declare that the era of "select all squares containing traffic lights" must end.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Interviewer: Welcome, everyone. Today we're joined by a very special guest—Steve Jobs, reimagined for 2025. Steve, it's incredible to have you with us. To start, how do you see AI evolving in the next decade? Steve Jobs (2025): It's a pleasure to be here.

    Ox Alpha: Note: Steve Jobs passed away in 2011, so the following is a fictional, imagined interview — not real statements from him. Interviewer: Welcome back to Future Tense. Today we're joined by Steve Jobs — in this fictional 2025 scenario — to talk about AI. Steve, let's start big: where is AI taking us?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Pirate: Arrr, matey! This talk of AI models be like a treasury of secrets. Can they truly understand our tales of the high seas? Knight: Hmph. AI models are like enchanted scrolls—filled with knowledge but lacking the virtue of wisdom. They serve to assist men, yet cannot replace honor or valor.

    Ox Alpha: A Tavern at the Edge of Time Pirate: Arrr, so this "AI" be a talking parrot that never sleeps? I've had parrots. They squawk nonsense too. Knight: Nay, good pirate. 'Tis more like an oracle in a box.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: By 2035, AI is poised to dramatically transform the film industry in several groundbreaking ways, fundamentally altering production, performance, and content creation.

    Ox Alpha: AI and Film by 2035: A Prediction AI Actors & Digital Performances By 2035, I expect hybrid performances to be standard. Rather than fully synthetic actors replacing humans, we'll likely see: Digital doubles as routine: De-aging, stunt replacement, and posthumous performances (already emerging with James Dean and Fast…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: 1. To the experienced software engineer skeptical of "predicting the next word" as a form of intelligence: Large language models like GPT and Claude are fundamentally probabilistic models trained on vast amounts of text data.

    Ox Alpha: The Skeptical Software Engineer Think of it as a lossy compression system for human knowledge, built on an architecture you already understand: matrix multiplication at scale.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Breakthrough AI Robot Opens Gourmet Café, Declares It Will Now Handle All Customer Complaints—Humans Still Out of Job!

    Ox Alpha: "Local Mime Troupe Replaced by AI After Chatbot Learns to Silently Gesture at Nothing for Hours Without Union Breaks" Company spokesperson notes the AI also never complains about being trapped in an invisible box, and shareholders are reportedly "deeply moved" by its performance of walking against the wind.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Certainly! Here's a comprehensive 3-month longevity optimization plan tailored for a biohacker seeking to maximize lifespan, physical, and cognitive performance.

    Ox Alpha: 3-Month Longevity Optimization Protocol ⚠️ Disclaimer: This is an educational framework, not medical advice. Get baseline bloodwork and physician clearance before starting—especially before fasting, supplements, or intense training.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Certainly! Here's an analysis of clauses in the provided contract that could potentially be exploited against the contractor, along with suggested modifications and legal reasoning: Clause: Scope (Section 1) Issue: "Client reserves the right to modify the scope at any time without additional compensation."

    Ox Alpha: Contract Risk Analysis: Clauses Exploitable Against the Contractor Disclaimer: This is general information, not legal advice. Have a licensed attorney review before signing.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Certainly! Here's an analysis of the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, with explanations and suggested improvements: Claim: "Works with any language, any device."

    Ox Alpha: Three Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch "94% accuracy" (Slide 3) — Unverifiable and likely misleading Why it's weak: No methodology disclosed: 94% accuracy on what task? Character-level? Word-level? Free-form text generation vs. selecting from a small vocabulary?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Here are 5 jokes for you: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call fake spaghetti? An impasta! Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired! Why did the math book look sad?

    Ox Alpha: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! How does a penguin build its house? Igloos it together! Why don't eggs tell jokes? They'd crack each other up!

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Sally has 2 sisters. Here's the reasoning: Sally has 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters. Since Sally is one of those sisters, the other sister is the other girl brothers share. Therefore, Sally has 2 sisters in total.

    Ox Alpha: Sally has 1 sister. Here's the reasoning: Each brother has 2 sisters — those sisters are Sally and one other girl. Since all siblings share the same family, Sally has exactly 1 sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Same pick

Game

GPT-4.1 NanoGPT-4.1 Nano

Inception

2010

In the Aeroplane Over the Sea

Neutral Milk Hotel

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Douglas Adams

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Ox AlphaOx Alpha

2001: A Space Odyssey

1968

OK Computer

Radiohead

Братья Карамазовы

Fiódor Dostoievski

Kyoto

Japan

Outer Wilds

Indie, Adventure

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Ox Alpha has the edge: bigger model tier, newer.

GPT-4.1 Nano and Ox Alpha compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGPT-4.1 NanoOx Alpha
Input price$0.1/M tokensFree
Output price$0.4/M tokensFree
Context window1.0M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2025Aug 2026
At 10M a month$1.00$1.00$0$0
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it2 hosts
GPT-4.1 Nano2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$0.10 in·$0.40 out·1M·99.9% up
  • OpenAI$0.10 in·$0.40 out·1M·99.9% up
Ox Alpha

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 7 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GPT-4.1 Nano and Ox Alpha?

GPT-4.1 Nano is developed by OpenAI while Ox Alpha is developed by OpenRouter. GPT-4.1 Nano has a 1.0M token context window vs Ox Alpha's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GPT-4.1 Nano or Ox Alpha?

It depends on your use case. GPT-4.1 Nano and Ox Alpha each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GPT-4.1 Nano cost compared to Ox Alpha?

GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.1/M input tokens and Ox Alpha costs $0/M input tokens. Ox Alpha is $0.10/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GPT-4.1 Nano and Ox Alpha on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-4.1 Nano and Ox Alpha across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Ox Alpha vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Ox Alpha vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Ox Alpha vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • Ox Alpha vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 Sol ProSame lab
  • Ox Alpha vs OpenRouter Fusion · Budget (Jun 2026)Same lab
  • Ox Alpha vs OpenRouter Fusion · Quality (Jun 2026)Same lab
  • Ox Alpha vs MiniMax M2New provider
  • Ox Alpha vs MiniMax M2-herSame size
  • Ox Alpha vs MiniMax M2.1Same size
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs MiniMax M2.5New provider

Model pages

  • GPT-4.1 Nano55 outputs, specs and price
  • Ox Alpha58 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed