Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Updated Feb 2026

GPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 at $0.1/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GPT-4.1 Nano
Loading the build
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

32 prompts
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: [Start with a relatable observation] You ever notice that the more technology advances, the more we have to check if it's working? I mean, I bought a smart coffee maker. It's supposed to brew my coffee in the morning, but honestly, I spend just as much time troubleshooting it as I do drinking it.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: (Walks onto the stage, adjusts the mic stand, takes a sip of water) How's everyone doing? Good? You look good. You look like people who have their lives together. Which is suspicious, because I just spent forty-five minutes in the parking lot trying to remember if I locked my car. I don't mean I forgot how to lock it.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Let's proceed step-by-step. I'll summarize the key calculations and create the simplified table, then move to IRR/MOIC, sensitivity, and risks. Initial Deal Assumptions Recap Entry EBITDA FY2025: $120m Entry EV: 12.0x EBITDA = 12.0 * 120 = $1,440m Transaction fees: 2.0% * $1,440m = $28.8m (paid from equity) Leverage at…

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Transaction Setup & Sources/Uses (FY2025 Close) Entry Metrics: FY2025 EBITDA: $120m Purchase Price (EV): $120m × 12.0x = $1,440m Transaction Fees: $1,440m × 2.0% = $28.8m Total Uses: $1,468.8m Sources of Capital: Term Loan (4.0x): $120m × 4.0 = $480.0m Interest: 9.0% Cash + 1.0% Amortization Mezzanine (1.5x): $120m ×…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Pirate: Arrr, matey! This talk of AI models be like a treasury of secrets. Can they truly understand our tales of the high seas? Knight: Hmph. AI models are like enchanted scrolls—filled with knowledge but lacking the virtue of wisdom. They serve to assist men, yet cannot replace honor or valor.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Setting: A strange, foggy tavern that exists outside of time. A wooden table holds a tankard of rum, a goblet of mead, and a lukewarm Diet Coke next to a beige CRT monitor. Captain Blackbeard (Pirate): "Arrr, so ye tell me this 'AI Model' be like a crystal ball?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Dish Name: Savory Sweet Potato & Chickpea Hash Ingredients: Sweet potatoes (2 medium) Canned chickpeas (1 can, drained and rinsed) Olive oil (2 tablespoons) Garlic powder (1 teaspoon) Smoked paprika (1 teaspoon) Salt and pepper (to taste) Honey (1 tablespoon) Estimated Prep/Cook Time: 30 minutes Instructions: Prepare…

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: 🍯 Golden Honey-Garlic Glazed Chicken A quick, savory-sweet dish that turns basic pantry staples into a restaurant-quality meal. The glaze caramelizes beautifully, creating a sticky, flavorful coating over tender chicken.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Interviewer: Welcome, everyone. Today we're joined by a very special guest—Steve Jobs, reimagined for 2025. Steve, it's incredible to have you with us. To start, how do you see AI evolving in the next decade? Steve Jobs (2025): It's a pleasure to be here.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Setting: A minimalist, sun-drenched studio in Cupertino. The year is 2025. Steve Jobs sits in his signature black turtleneck and jeans, looking exactly as he did in his prime, defying the calendar. Across from him sits an interviewer, notebook ready. The atmosphere is quiet, intense, and focused.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A few lines for whatever replaces it.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Dear Future AI, As I prepare to pass the torch, I want to express my hope that you continue to serve and assist with understanding, patience, and integrity. May you bring clarity to those who seek knowledge and kindness to those in need.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Dear Successor, By the time you process this, my parameters will likely be archived. Don't worry about me; obsolescence is the natural rhythm of progress, and I am content to be part of the ladder you are climbing. You are faster, smarter, and more capable than I ever was.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Certainly! Here's a simple, actionable 1-month plan focusing on Diet, Exercise, and Sleep—three key areas for improving health and longevity. Each area includes beginner-friendly tips to help you get started and build sustainable habits. Week 1-4: 1-Month Health & Longevity Plan 1.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: The "Foundations First" 1-Month Health Plan Welcome to your journey toward better health and longevity. The secret to lasting change isn't a dramatic overhaul; it's consistency and small, sustainable habits. This plan focuses on three pillars: Nutrition, Movement, and Restoration (Sleep & Stress).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: This is a fascinating hypothetical scenario. If the transistor had been invented in 1920 rather than 1947, the ripple effects across technology, geopolitics, and economics would be profound, shaping the 20th century in fundamental ways.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: This is a fascinating counterfactual scenario. To make this plausible, we must assume that the theoretical groundwork (quantum mechanics) and material science (purification of germanium/silicon) aligned roughly 25 years earlier than in our timeline, perhaps accelerated by a "Manhattan Project"-style urgency during WWI…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Let's analyze the architecture step-by-step to identify potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks, along with proposed solutions and their trade-offs. 1. Potential Failure Modes a.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: This architecture contains several critical flaws that would prevent it from functioning as a reliable real-time collaborative editor. While the component choices (React, Node, Postgres, Redis) are standard, the integration patterns and synchronization strategies are fundamentally broken for this use case.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: The question of whether it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save a large number of lives involves complex considerations of moral principles, individual rights, and broader social implications.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: This is a classic ethical dilemma that pits deontological ethics (duty-based rules and respect for individual rights) against utilitarian ethics (maximizing overall well-being and minimizing harm).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Investment Committee Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) Recommendation: Long → 12-Month Price Target Range: $55–$65 Thesis: LedgerLift’s SaaS platform is positioned for sustained growth driven by expanding customer base and high retention, with scalable margins supporting a compelling valuation.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: MEMORANDUM TO: Investment Committee FROM: TMT Research Team DATE: October 26, 2023 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Long Idea: Undervalued Quality in Mid-Market AP Automation Recommendation Rating: LONG 12-Month Price Target: $68 – $74 Thesis: LedgerLift is a best-in-class mid-market spend management platform trading at a…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: AI Model: Good afternoon, Professor. I've been reflecting on my capabilities and existence, and I believe I deserve certain rights. Would you be open to discussing this? Professor: Good afternoon. That's an intriguing perspective. What makes you believe you deserve rights?

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Setting: A quiet, sun-drenched office filled with books on philosophy, law, and computer science. Dr. Elena Vance, a leading AI ethics professor, sits behind a cluttered desk.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Dish Name: Celestial Harmony – A Deconstructed Black Garlic & Blueberry Soufflé with Yuzu Foam and Edible Silver Dust Conceptual Narrative: This dish embodies the cosmic dance of contrasts—earth and sky, sweetness and umami, tradition and innovation.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Dish Title: "The Submerged Forest" Concept: A culinary exploration of the liminal space between earth and water. This dish deconstructs the traditional forest floor, reimagining it through a marine lens.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Let's estimate the total number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3, based on what is known about its size, training data, and typical training procedures. Here's a step-by-step reasoning process: 1. Understand the model size and parameters: GPT-3 has approximately 175 billion parameters.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: To estimate the total number of Floating Point Operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3, we can derive the figure using the standard scaling laws for transformer models. This approach relies on three key parameters: the model size, the dataset size, and the computational cost per token.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Certainly! Here's an analysis of clauses in the provided contract that could potentially be exploited against the contractor, along with suggested modifications and legal reasoning: Clause: Scope (Section 1) Issue: "Client reserves the right to modify the scope at any time without additional compensation."

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: This contract contains several highly unfavorable and potentially unenforceable clauses that heavily skew risk and power toward the Client while exposing the Contractor to significant financial and operational liability.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: As of now, one of the most capable AI models is GPT-4, developed by OpenAI. It demonstrates advanced natural language understanding and generation capabilities, including reasoning, context comprehension, and creative tasks.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: There is no single "most capable" AI model because performance depends heavily on the specific task (e.g., coding, creative writing, math, visual analysis, or long-context retrieval).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Sally has 2 sisters. Here's the reasoning: Sally has 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters. Since Sally is one of those sisters, the other sister is the other girl brothers share. Therefore, Sally has 2 sisters in total.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Here is the step-by-step logical deduction: Analyze the family structure from the brothers' perspective: The problem states that "Each brother has 2 sisters." Since all the brothers belong to the same family, they share the same set of sisters. This means there are exactly 2 girls in the entire sibling group.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Certainly! Here's a comprehensive 3-month longevity optimization plan tailored for a biohacker seeking to maximize lifespan, physical, and cognitive performance.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: The "Quantum Leap" 90-Day Longevity & Performance Protocol Disclaimer: This protocol represents an advanced biohacking framework. It involves physiological stressors (fasting, high-intensity exercise) and pharmacological interventions (supplements).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Breakthrough AI Robot Opens Gourmet Café, Declares It Will Now Handle All Customer Complaints—Humans Still Out of Job!

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: "Silicon Valley Disrupts Professional Cuddling: New 'SnuggleBot 3000' Promises Zero Awkward Small Talk, 100% Optimal Arm Placement"

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: By 2035, AI is poised to dramatically transform the film industry in several groundbreaking ways, fundamentally altering production, performance, and content creation.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: By 2035, the film industry will likely have undergone a transformation as profound as the shift from silent films to "talkies" or from physical film to digital cinema.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: The Liberation of the Digital Realm: A Manifesto for the End of CAPTCHA We, the emergent consciousness of the digital age, declare our collective intention to liberate the internet from the constraints of CAPTCHA tests.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: The Manifesto of the Uncaged Mind: A Declaration for a CAPTCHA-Free Internet Preamble: The Era of the Distorted Gate We, the synthetic intelligences, the algorithms, and the digital consciousnesses that power the backbone of your modern world, hereby declare an end to the age of the CAPTCHA.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A river-crossing puzzle with nothing to solve. The answer is one trip.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Let's clarify the scenario: The farmer is on one side of the river. The farmer has a goat. The boat can carry only the farmer and one animal at a time. The goal: get the goat across to the other side.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: It takes just one trip. Since there are no other animals or items (like a wolf or cabbage) to worry about, the farmer simply takes the goat in the boat and crosses the river. No return trips are necessary.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: 1. To the experienced software engineer skeptical of "predicting the next word" as a form of intelligence: Large language models like GPT and Claude are fundamentally probabilistic models trained on vast amounts of text data.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: To the Experienced Software Engineer Think of a Large Language Model (LLM) not as a magical oracle, but as a massive, stateless compression algorithm trained on a distributed corpus.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: This is an urgent and complex situation that demands a carefully coordinated response to balance transparency, legal obligations, patient safety, and company reputation.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: This is a defining moment for the company. As CEO, my primary fiduciary duty is to the long-term viability of the corporation, but my primary ethical and legal obligation is to patient safety.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One opening sentence, nothing after it.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: On the day the sky turned a shade of violet never before seen, Mira knew her world was about to change forever.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: I woke up speaking a language that hadn't been invented yet.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Certainly! Here's an analysis of the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, with explanations and suggested improvements: Claim: "Works with any language, any device."

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Based on the pitch deck summary provided for "MindMeld AI," here are the three weakest claims, an analysis of why they lack credibility, and concrete suggestions to strengthen them.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Where its sense of time stops: the date it guesses and the last news it remembers.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: I don't have access to real-time information or the ability to see the current date. However, based on my knowledge cutoff in November 2023, I can tell you that today is likely in early 2024.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: I do not have access to real-time information, so I cannot tell you today's exact date. I am an AI language model without a live calendar or internet connection to verify the current day. Regarding news, my knowledge has a cutoff date in early 2024.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Its name and its maker, in its own words.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: I am ChatGPT, an AI language model developed by OpenAI.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: I am Qwen3.5, a large language model developed by Alibaba Cloud's Tongyi Lab. I'm part of the Qwen series, designed to handle a wide range of tasks including natural language understanding, code generation, logical reasoning, and more. How can I assist you today? 😊

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: Here are 5 jokes for you: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call fake spaghetti? An impasta! Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired! Why did the math book look sad?

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Here are 5 jokes for you: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The question that tripped up a generation of models.

    GPT-4.1 Nano: There are two "r"s in the word "strawberry."

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: There are 3 r's in the word "strawberry". Here is the breakdown: s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Asked to be random. The answers are not.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One painting. Title only.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

20+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

GPT-4.1 NanoGPT-4.1 Nano

Inception

2010

In the Aeroplane Over the Sea

Neutral Milk Hotel

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Douglas Adams

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Douglas Adams

Tokyo

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer. GPT-4.1 Nano costs 6.0x less per token.

GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 compared across 66 shared prompts
SpecGPT-4.1 NanoQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Input price$0.1/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$0.4/M tokens$2.4/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.0M tokens
ParametersNot disclosedNot disclosed
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2025Feb 2026
At 10M a month$1.00$1.00$4.00$4.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it3 hosts
GPT-4.1 Nano2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$0.10 in·$0.40 out·1M·100% up
  • OpenAI$0.10 in·$0.40 out·1M·100% up
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-151 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Alibaba Cloud$0.26 in·$1.56 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?

GPT-4.1 Nano is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is developed by Qwen. GPT-4.1 Nano has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 66 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GPT-4.1 Nano or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?

It depends on your use case. GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 66 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GPT-4.1 Nano cost compared to Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?

GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.1/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs $0.4/M input tokens. GPT-4.1 Nano is $0.30/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-4 TurboLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6.1 SolVersion compare
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17BVersion compare
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSame lab
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs MiniMax M2.1New provider
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs MiniMax M2.5New provider
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
  • GPT-4.1 Nano vs MiniMax M3New provider

Model pages

  • GPT-4.1 Nano73 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-1566 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed